| Advance Organizer Before beginning the course take some time to review and think about what you already know about HDFN. For example, jot down brief notes to answer the following questions: Which antibody causes the most severe HDFN? Antibodies in which blood group system are the most common cause of positive direct antiglobulin tests (DATs) in newborns but rarely cause clinically significant hemolysis? Should DATs be performed on all newborns regardless of maternal ABO and Rh blood groups? What is Rh immune globulin (RhIg), its source, constituents, purpose, and mechanism of action? Which tests are used to determine postnatal RhIg dosage? Which type of D variant can produce anti-D? What follow-up tests are typically indicated if a pregnant female has a positive antibody screen when initially tested? Which laboratory findings would suggest that an infant may have ABO HDFN? How can the clinical status of fetuses at risk for HDFN be monitored? What are the characteristics of red cells suitable for intravenous transfusion to fetuses suffering from severe HDFN due to anti-D? | View Page |
| Introduction Although HDFN can be life threatening, in the case of anti-D it is a disease that can be prevented. Regardless of causative antibody, HDFN's serious consequences can be lessened by early laboratory diagnosis and treatment. This course begins with an in-depth review of HDFN and later discusses its prevention in detail. In reviewing HDFN, key questions to be answered include: What are the typical signs and symptoms of severe HDFN? Which serologic tests does the transfusion service laboratory use to diagnose HDFN? How is severe HDFN treated? Which development dramatically changed the incidence of HDFN due to anti-D? Other than the causative antibodies, what are some of the main differences between ABO HDFN and HDFN due to anti-D and other antibodies? | View Page |
| Prenatal Treatment Prenatal treatment of severe HDFN due to anti-D consists of in utero transfusions. Because of significant risks, transfusion is indicated only if fetal monitoring suggests significant hemolytic disease. 1. Intrauterine Transfusion (IUT)IUTs are done when fetal monitoring indicates severe HDFN and the fetus is too premature for early delivery. IUTs involve the intraperitoneal infusion of packed red cells. The success of the procedure depends on absorption of the red cells through the subdiaphragmatic lymphatic vessels of the fetus. 2. Intravenous transfusion (IVT)Because there may be erratic and inconsistent absorption of intrauterine transfusions in severely hydropic fetuses, IVTs were developed. IVTs involve transfusing donor RBC directly into the umbilical vein. | View Page |
| Postnatal Treatment: Exchange Transfusion Whenever possible, a hallmark of HDFN treatment is to induce labor as early as possible once lung maturity has been attained so that the newborn will be able to survive. Once the infant is born, the main treatment for severe HDFN due to anti-D (and other antibodies causing severe disease) is exchange transfusion. In exchange transfusions, up to 85–90% of the infant's blood can be exchanged with donor blood by a process of removing 5–20 mL of blood at a time, and injecting an equivalent amount until the exchange is complete. An exchange transfusion accomplishes the following: Removes bilirubin and thus helps prevent kernicterus; Removes sensitized red cells that have not been broken down yet; Removes circulating maternal antibody; Provides antigen-negative red cells that will not be destroyed by the maternal antibody, thus will survive and provide oxygen to the tissues. | View Page |
| Other Postnatal Treatment Besides exchange transfusion, postnatal treatment of HDFN may include the following:RBC TransfusionMany infants who have received IUTs also require simple RBC transfusions in the first few weeks of life to treat ongoing hemolysis caused by persistent maternal antibody in the newborn's circulation.Phototherapy Phototherapy is used to treat jaundice in preterm infants without HDFN and in infants with mild HDFN. Intensive phototherapy has also been used to treat moderate and severe HDFN and decrease the need for exchange transfusion. The newborn is placed under a "blue light" which chemically alters the bilirubin in the surface capillaries to a harmless substance. Human Serum AlbuminHuman serum albumin can also be transfused, either separately or as part of an exchange transfusion in place of FFP. Albumin binds unconjugated bilirubin, thus preventing its deposition in the fat-rich brain cells. Albumin must be used judiciously, because it can aggravate congestive heart failure. | View Page |
| Fetal Monitoring: Doppler Ultrasonography Fetal monitoring is used to assess the severity of HDFN and determine whether antenatal transfusion Is warranted.Monitoring can be accomplished by: Doppler ultrasonography Amniocentesis CordocentesisDoppler sonography Doppler sonography is a type of ultrasound that detects and measures blood flow. As related to HDFN, Doppler sonography can be done beginning at 18 weeks. It measures the peak velocity of systolic blood flow in the fetal middle cerebral artery and is used to predict severity of fetal anemia. The hypothesis is that a faster rate of blood flow indicates a more severely anemic fetus, with severe anemia being an indicator of fetal hydrops.Because Doppler sonography is noninvasive and a safer alternative to amniocentesis, it has largely replaced serial amniocentesis for predicting severity of HDFN. | View Page |
| ABO HDFN - Treatment Prenatal treatment Prenatal management and treatment of ABO HDFN is not routinely done because: Titers of anti-A and anti-B do not correlate well with severity of disease; The risks of fetal monitoring (e.g., amniocentesis, cordocentesis) and fetal transfusion are greater than the risk of ABO HDFN since it is usually mild and subclinical. However, if a woman has a history of infants with moderate to severe ABO HDFN requiring treatment, she may be monitored so that the infant can be treated for possible HDFN as soon as possible. Postnatal TreatmentTreatment of ABO HDFN usually consists of phototherapy in which the newborn is placed under a "blue light" that chemically alters bilirubin in the surface capillaries to a harmless substance.For more severe cases, exchange transfusion may be performed. Donor RBC for exchange transfusion in cases of ABO HDFN must meet these criteria: Group O; Rh compatible with infant; Less than or equal to 7 days old (or fresher); Reconstituted with AB FFP to obtain a prescribed hematocrit; CMV negative (or equivalent, e.g., leukoreduced by filtration); Negative for hemoglobin S to prevent blood from sickling under conditions of reduced oxygen concentration in the newborn; Irradiated to prevent graft-versus-host disease. Exchange transfusion is also discussed later in the course in the section related to HDFN due to anti-D and other antibodies. Red Blood Cells are crossmatched with maternal plasma, although the infant's plasma can be used if a maternal blood specimen is unavailable. | View Page |
| All of the following criteria for donor RBC to be used for an exchange transfusion relate to both ABO HDFN and HDFN due to anti-D:Less than or equal to 7 days old (or fresher) Reconstituted with AB FFP CMV negative Negative for hemoglobin S Irradiated | View Page |
| ABO HDFN - Expected Findings Diagnosis of ABO HDFN is supported by these findings: ABO incompatibility between mother and child, with mother typically group O; Maternal antibody screen negative; Cord DAT weakly positive or negative; Newborn hyperbilirubinemia with jaundice occurring in first 24 hours; Increased spherocytes and reticulocytosis in the newborn; Presence of IgG anti-A or anti-B in cord plasma / serum. | View Page |
| Factors That Affect Production of Anti-D Exposure to D+ red cells: Anti-D is red cell immune. The usual route of exposure to the D antigen is during pregnancy. Fetal bleeds into the mother occur more commonly at delivery but some may occur antenatally due to small lesions in the placenta or due to placenta previa, amniocentesis, abdominal trauma, abortion, ectopic pregnancy, etc. Transfusion is a relatively rare route of exposure since Rh-negative individuals normally receive only Rh-negative donor red cells. However, Rh-negative transfusion recipients may be exposed to small volumes of D-positive red cells in Rh-positive platelet concentrates. Also, there are rare reports of fresh frozen plasma, not normally matched for Rh(D), causing anti-D production.Volume of fetal bleed: In general, the larger the fetal bleed, the more likely the mother is to produce anti-D. Approximately 1 pregnancy in 400 result in a fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) of 30 mL or greater. ABO incompatibility between mother and fetus: If fetal red cells are ABO incompatible with the mother, maternal anti-A or anti-B will rapidly remove fetal cells from the circulation before anti-D can be produced. This protection decreases the chance of anti-D being produced but does not eliminate it entirely. | View Page |
| Criteria for Transfused Red Blood Cells The Red Blood Cells (RBC) that are chosen for exchange transfusion must meet these criteria: ABO-compatible with mother and infant (usually group O) and lack antigens to any maternal IgG antibodies; If mother has anti-D, RBCs are group O Rh negative; No greater than 7 days old; Reconstituted with AB Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) to obtain a prescribed hematocrit, e.g., 45–60% (0.45–0.60); CMV negative (or equivalent, e.g., leukoreduced by filtration); Negative for hemoglobin S to prevent blood from hypoxia-induced sickling; Irradiated with a minimum dose of 25 Gray (Gy) to prevent graft-versus-host disease.RBC are normally crossmatched with maternal plasma, although the infant's plasma can be used if a maternal blood specimen is unavailable. | View Page |
| Molecular Genotyping - Mother Mother's Rh Type - Weak D or Partial DRecall that some individuals have a variant RHD gene that encodes a reduced concentration of D antigen (weak D) or a D antigen with missing D epitopes (partial D). Various anti-D reagents react differently with these red cells and interpreting Rh(D) type can vary with the method used, e.g., tubes, solid phase, gel. Differentiating between weak D and partial D is important in pregnant women. Those with partial D, but not usually weak D, may make anti-D and should be considered D negative for transfusion and as RhIg candidates. Currently, serologic reagents cannot distinguish the two D variants, but RHD genotyping can. | View Page |
| Use in Pregnancy As applied to pregnancy, RhIg's purpose is to prevent immunization to the D antigen in the perinatal period and thus prevent HDFN due to anti-D. If the mother has already produced anti-D, RhIg is of no use in moderating the immune response.Accordingly, RhIg is routinely administered to Rh negative women not previously sensitized to the D antigen under the following circumstances:1, Antenatal. Antepartum prophylaxis of 300 µg (1500 IU) at about 28 weeks gestation in the USA and Canada, which could be weeks later, depending on how appointments are scheduled. To illustrate variation in antenatal international practice, in the UK, smaller doses of RhIg (e.g., 500 IU) may be given at 28 weeks and 34 weeks, although many UK facilities issue a 1500 IU dose at 28–30 weeks. With antenatal administration, the Rh of the fetus is usually unknown. Some transfusion services recommend a further antenatal dose if the infant is undelivered after 40 weeks.2. Postnatal. Prophylaxis of 300 µg (1500 IU) at delivery of an Rh positive or weak D infant within 72 hours of delivery whenever possible. If RhIg administration is delayed beyond 72 hours, laboratory policies differ as to when it would no longer be administered. The longer the delay, the more likely RhIg may fail to suppress production of anti-D, but it is still worth trying. Note: Because RhIg contains IgG anti-D, when given antenatally, it can cross the placenta and sensitize fetal D-positive red cells. Occasionally the fetus may be born with a weakly positive DAT, but significant hemolysis does not occur. For this reason some guidelines recommend that labs do NOT routinely perform DATs on infants whose mothers have received antenatal RhIg. | View Page |
| RhIg & Variants of D As noted, policies for administering RhIg to mothers with a variant of D vary among countries and within some countries. An Rh(D) red blood cell phenotype with a weak or variant expression of the D antigen occurs in 0.2% to 1% of whites and is slightly more common in African Americans. The phenotype is routinely called weak D, although several variants exist. A simple model includes these D variants: 1. Weak DMultiple weak D variants exist. Red cells have fewer D antigens/red cell (quantitative difference) and only minor variations in D antigen proteins. Some, but not all, weak D phenotypes are detected by today's Rh typing sera and may be classified as Rh positive or Rh negative by routine testing but will be positive when a weak D test (IAT with anti-D) is done. An extreme form of weak D is the Del phenotype, in which the D antigen is so weakly expressed that it may be demonstrated only by adsorption and elution of anti-D. Weak D individuals do NOT produce anti-D and can be considered to be Rh positive for transfusion and RhIg purposes.2. Partial DPartial D variants have altered Rh(D) proteins that differ sufficiently from normal D antigens (qualitative difference) to allow anti-D production. Partial D red cells may react with some but not all anti-D typing reagents. There are many categories of partial D antigens (e.g., DIIIa, DVI, DAR), each with a unique genetic basis.Some persons with partial D have weakly expressed D epitopes and are designated "partial weak D."In practice, partial D and weak partial D can be considered similarly, i.e., ideally they should be transfused with Rh negative RBC and are candidates to receive perinatal Rh immune globulin depending on the policy in their location. | View Page |
| RhIg Policies for Weak D Of the main D variants, a female with partial D (or partial weak D) may develop anti-D to the D epitopes that she lacks. Moreover, partial D red cells adsorb little anti-D, thus leaving enough free RhIg to suppress immunization.However, most laboratories do not routinely differentiate between D variants and instead rely on routine tests and associated test protocols to determine a mother's Rh status for the purposes of RhIg administration. Policies differ between countries and even within countries. 1. Some labs do not test pregnant women for weak D and rely on routine D typing to determine Rh status. AABB Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, ed. 26 (2010) does not require weak D testing for Rh negative pregnant women, nor for patients requiring transfusion. Note, however, that College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys have shown that more than 50% of responding laboratories do routinely perform weak D testing on such patients.2. Some labs perform weak D tests on pregnant women who appear to be Rh negative and, if weak D, do NOT inject with RhIg.3. Some labs perform weak D tests on pregnant women who appear to be Rh negative and, if weak D, inject with RhIg based on the possibility that they may be partial D and capable of forming anti-D. | View Page |
| International RhIg Policies Currently, policies in the USA and UK favor giving RhIg to women who type as weak D. In Canada, the Society of Obstetrics and Gyneacology recommends not giving RhIg to women who type as weak D BUT in some locations, weak D women do indeed receive RhIg in pregnancy.Many other countries also recommend not giving RhIg to women who type as weak D but policies again vary even within countries.Summary: Because policies vary internationally and change over time AND because the availability of molecular testing to differentiate weak and partial D Rh types will evolve, recommending a specific protocol for RhIg administration and weak D status is difficult. Consult SOPs and policies in your transfusion services manual for the situation in your locale. | View Page |
| Literature and Online Resources The following published literature and online resources, while useful, should not be used as a substitute for technical and clinical judgment. Medical and technical information becomes obsolete quickly and current sources relevant to the user's location should always be consulted.References indicated by * provide a broad overview of HDFN and are highly recommended.LITERATUREAvent ND, Reid ME. The Rh blood group system: a review. Blood 2000 Jan 15;95 (2):375-87.Bowman J. Thirty-five years of Rh prophylaxis. Transfusion 2003 Dec;43(12):1661-6.* Eder AF. Update on HDFN: new information on long-standing controversies. Immunohematology 2006;22(4):188–195. (scroll to article)Eder, AF, Manno, C.S. Alloimmune hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology, 11th ed. (Greer JP, Foerster J, Lukens JN, Rodgers GM, Paraskevas F, Glader BE, (eds). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2004.Flegel WA. Molecular genetics of RH and its clinical application. Transfus Clin Biol. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(1-2):4-12. Kennedy MS, McNanie J, Waheed A. Detection of anti-D following antepartum injections of Rh immune globulin. Immunohematology 1998;14(4):138-40.Koelewijn JM, de Haas M, Vrijkotte TG, van der Schoot CE, Bonsel GJ. Risk factors for RhD immunisation despite antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis. BJOG. 2009 Sep;116 (10): 1307-14. Epub 2009 Jun 17.* Kumar S, Regan F. Management of pregnancies with RhD alloimmunisation. BMJ. 2005 May 28;330(7502):1255-8. (UK perspective but much valuable information relevant to all)* Murray NA, Roberts IAG. Haemolytic disease of the newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007 Mar; 92(2): F83–F88. Oepkes D, Seaward PG, Vandenbussche FP, Windrim R, Kingdom J, Beyene J, Kanhai HH, Ohlsson A, Ryan G; DIAMOND Study Group. Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict fetal anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 13;355(2):156-64.Ramsey G. Inaccurate doses of Rh immune globulin after Rh-incompatible fetomaternal hemorrhage: survey of laboratory practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009 Mar; 133(3):465-9. Reid ME. The Rh antigen D: a review for clinicians. Blood Bulletin 2008 Apr; 10(1).Sandler SG. Effectiveness of the RhIg dose calculator. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010 Jul;134(7): 967-8.Shulman IA, Calderon C, Nelson JM, Nakayama R. The routine use of Rh-negative reagent red cells for the identification of anti-D and the detection of non-D red cell antibodies. Transfusion 1994 Aug;34(8):666-70.Tamul KR. Determining fetal-maternal hemorrhage with flow cytometry. Advance 2000. Posted online June 5, 2000.Westhoff CM, Sloan SR. Molecular genotyping in transfusion medicine. Clin Chem 2008;54(12): 1948-50.ONLINE RESOURCESPaxton A. Bringing new rigor to RhIg calculations. CAP TODAY. May 2008. Accessed January 18, 2011.*Wagle S, Deshpande PG. Hemolytic disease of the newborn. eMedicine / WebMD. Updated Apr. 9, 2010. Accessed January 18, 2011. | View Page |
| Case Presentation Patient A.D., a 30 year old female, was admitted to the hospital in active labor to deliver at 37 weeks gestation. Transfusion service (TS) records showed A.D. to be group O Rh negative with no record of unexpected red cell antibodies.Maternal history showed two prior pregnancies. Her first pregnancy four years ago ended in spontaneous abortion at 9 weeks gestation and she received a mini-dose (50 µg) of RhIg.In the second pregnancy, two years ago, the infant typed as Group A Rh positive, DAT negative. Patient A.D. was injected with RhIg within 72 hours of delivery. The laboratory also confirmed that in the current pregnancy RhIg was administered at approximately 28 weeks gestation subsequent to a negative antibody screen.After many hours of non-productive labor, the physician considered that labor had stalled and decided to do a cesarian section (C-section). According to hospital policy for C-sections, a type and screen was ordered. | View Page |
| Introduction This case concerns a common scenario in the transfusion service (TS) laboratory, the detection of anti-D at delivery in a female who has received Rh immune globulin (RhIg) during pregnancy.Distinguishing between passive and immune anti-D is important clinically: If passive anti-D is misinterpreted as immune, RhIg prophylaxis may be omitted leading to D sensitization. If immune anti-D is misinterpreted as passive, appropriate follow-up of the antibody may be curtailed putting the fetus at risk.Unfortunately, differentiating between immune and passive anti-D is often impossible. This case study presents an opportunity to review perinatal testing programs and the crucial role of RhIg in preventing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-D. The case also examines practical aspects of routine serologic testing involving neonates and women who have received RhIg during pregnancy. The case is a companion to "Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn" and complements its content.In brief, the case will: Guide participants through laboratory findings that need to be interpreted and resolved; Examine current best practices in perinatal testing programs; Review the characteristics of RhIg and its use in pregnancy; Review and investigate key issues associated with detection of anti-D in women who have received antenatal RhIg; Discuss crossmatch and LIS policies related to RhIg-derived passive anti-D. | View Page |
| Use in Pregnancy As applied to pregnancy, RhIg's purpose is to prevent immunization to the D antigen in the perinatal period and thus prevent HDFN due to anti-D. If the mother has already produced anti-D, RhIg is of no use.Accordingly, RhIg is routinely administered to Rh negative women* not previously sensitized to the D antigen under the following circumstances:1, Antenatal. Antepartum prophylaxis of 300 µg (1500 IU) at about 28 weeks gestation in the USA and Canada, which could be weeks later, depending on how physician appointments are scheduled. To illustrate variation in antenatal international practice, in the UK smaller doses of RhIg (e.g., 500 IU) may be given at 28 weeks and 34 weeks, although many UK facilities issue a 1500 IU dose at 28–30 weeks. With antenatal administration, the Rh of the fetus is usually unknown. Some transfusion services recommend a further antenatal dose if the infant is undelivered after 40 weeks.2. Postnatal. Prophylaxis of 300 µg (1500 IU) at delivery of an Rh positive or weak D infant, preferably within 72 hours of delivery but can be given up to 28 days later if administration is delayed. If RhIg administration is delayed beyond 72 hours, laboratory policies differ as to when it would no longer be administered.* Policies related to women who are weak D (formerly Du) are discussed later.Note: Because RhIg contains IgG anti-D, when given antenatally, it can cross the placenta and sensitize fetal D-positive red cells. Occasionally the fetus may be born with a weakly positive DAT, but significant hemolysis does not occur. | View Page |
| RhIg & Variants of D As noted, policies for administering RhIg to mothers with a variant of D vary among countries and within some countries. An Rh(D) red blood cell phenotype with a weak or variant expression of the D antigen occurs in 0.2% to 1% of whites and is slightly more common in African Americans. The phenotype is routinely called weak D, although several variants exist. A simple model includes these D variants: 1. Weak DMultiple weak D variants exist. Red cells have fewer D antigens/red cell (quantitative difference) and only minor variations in D antigen proteins. Some, but not all, weak D phenotypes are detected by today's Rh typing sera and may be classified as Rh positive or Rh negative by routine testing but will be positive when a weak D test (IAT with anti-D) is done. An extreme form of weak D is the Del phenotype, in which the D antigen is so weakly expressed that it may be demonstrated only by adsorption and elution of anti-D. Weak D individuals do NOT produce anti-D and can be considered to be Rh positive for transfusion and RhIg purposes.2. Partial DPartial D variants have altered Rh(D) proteins that differ sufficiently from normal D antigens (qualitative difference) to allow anti-D production. Partial D red cells may react with some but not all anti-D typing reagents. There are many categories of partial D antigens (e.g., DIIIa, DVI, DAR), each with a unique genetic basis.Some persons with partial D have weakly expressed D epitopes and are designated "partial weak D."In practice, partial D and weak partial D can be considered similarly, i.e., ideally they should be transfused with Rh negative RBC and are candidates to receive perinatal Rh immune globulin depending on the policy in their location. | View Page |
| RhIg Policies for Weak D Of the main D variants, a female with partial D (or partial weak D) may develop anti-D to the D epitopes that she lacks. Fortunately, partial D red cells adsorb little anti-D, thus leaving enough free RhIg to suppress immunization.However, most laboratories do not routinely differentiate between D variants and instead rely on routine tests and associated test protocols to determine a mother's Rh status for the purposes of RhIg administration. Policies differ between countries and even within countries. 1. Some labs do not test pregnant women for weak D and rely on routine D typing to determine Rh status. AABB Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, ed. 26 (2010) does not require weak D testing for Rh negative women.2. Some labs perform weak D tests on pregnant women who appear to be Rh negative and, if weak D, do NOT inject with RhIg.3. Some labs perform weak D tests on pregnant women who appear to be Rh negative and, if weak D, inject with RhIg based on the possibility that they may be partial D and capable of forming anti-D. | View Page |
| Antibody Exclusion Protocol (General) Transfusion service (TS) laboratories use different protocols to exclude antibodies. For example:For antibodies whose corresponding antigens exhibit dosage, some laboratories exclude them based on a negative reaction with one homozygous cell.* Other laboratories require negatives with two homozygous cells to increase the confidence that the antibody is not present.If a homozygous cell is not available, some laboratories exclude such antibodies based on a negative reaction with two heterozygous cells.* Other laboratories require negatives with three heterozygous cells to increase confidence that the antibody is not present. * Homozygous and heterozygous do not refer to the red cells per se but to the red cell donors who are homozygous or heterozygous for the genes that determine the red cell phenotypes. See the general antibody exclusion protocol to be used in this case. | View Page |
| Antibody Titration Some TS laboratories try to determine if anti-D is passive or immune by performing titrations to determine the titer of the anti-D. Such a protocol usually assumes that an anti-D titer greater than 4 likely represents active immunization. Unfortunately, a titer of 4 or 8 could be active or passive, although a high titer (e.g., 64 or more) almost certainly means the anti-D is immune.Titration results can be affected by several variables: Red cell phenotype; Donor antigen variability (even if the same phenotype); Method used; Operator variability.Because lower titers could be due to both passive and immune anti-D, in the absence of test results that suggest immune anti-D, routine antibody titration is not a good use of time compared to assuming that anti-D is passive. Most transfusion medicine best practice guidelines do NOT recommend routine titration for women known to be injected with RhIg and exhibiting a 2+ or less reaction with D+ red cells, i.e., test results consistent with RhIg-derived passive anti-D. | View Page |
| Introduction As noted earlier, in this case study the laboratory's protocol is to set up a mini-panel, providing these criteria are met: Mother is Rh-negative and has been tested on two separate occasions; Laboratory has confirmed administration of RhIg prophylaxis; Result of current antibody screen is positive and typical of anti-D due to RhIg; There is no record or history of an unexpected antibody. All criteria were met and a selected mini-panel was set up to confirm the presence of anti-D and exclude possible co-existing maternal antibodies. Other clinically significant antibodies have implications for possible HDFN and for transfusion to both the mother and newborn, thus must be excluded. | View Page |
| Crossmatch Issues In this case the mother did not require transfusion. For reference, the TS laboratory routinely uses an electronic crossmatch to detect ABO incompatibility for cases where patients do not have unexpected clinically significant antibodies in current antibody screen tests nor a history of clinically significant antibodies. When the laboratory information system (LIS) is down, the lab performs an immediate spin crossmatch.Should transfusion have been needed, these questions arise:1. Does a mother with a detectable passive anti-D due to RhIg qualify for an immediate spin (IS) or electronic crossmatch should transfusion be necessary?The issue also extends to the future:2. Should having a record of passive anti-D that is no longer detectable disqualify a woman from being a candidate for an immediate spin or electronic crossmatch?Before proceeding, consider the policies used in your TS laboratory and which rationales are used to support them. | View Page |
| Crossmatch Implications of RhIg-associated Passive Anti-D Once again, policies vary from laboratory to laboratory since the issue is not directly addressed by blood safety standards. For example, AABB and other standards require a version of the following: When clinically significant red cell antibodies are detected or the recipient has a history of such antibodies, RBC components shall be prepared for transfusion that lack the corresponding antigen and are serologically crossmatch-compatible, where serologically is taken to be an IAT at 37oC. If no clinically significant antibodies were detected in antibody screen tests and the patient has no record of such antibodies, detection of ABO incompatibility is required, which can be accomplished by immediate spin crossmatch or an electronic crossmatch. The key issues are whether detectable passive anti-D from RhIg or a record of passive anti-D from RhIg should be considered clinically significant for crossmatch purposes. Because standards do not directly address these issues, TS laboratories are left to interpret what is required to meet the standards. Practices may be further complicated because of the transfusion service's laboratory information system (LIS). | View Page |
| LIS Issues Related to RhIg Before discussing crossmatch policies for women with passive anti-D likely due to RhIg, LIS-related issues will be outlined. A transfusion service's LIS and how it is configured determines under which circumstances an electronic crossmatch is possible.Regardless of crossmatch policy, almost all laboratories use a special designation or code in their LIS for anti-D likely due to RhIg. Often this designation is entered in the patient history comment field and not the antibody field, thus eliminating the need to remove the passive anti-D from the antibody field when the antibody disappears. Using this policy, once the passive antibody no longer reacts, the patient becomes eligible for an electronic crossmatch without the need to remove the antibody history.In essence, using a special designation for passive anti-D allows the lab to bypass the LIS's normal requirements for patients with clinically significant antibodies, i.e., allows them to omit doing an IAT crossmatch. Examples of how RhIg-derived anti-D is designated in lab information systems: Passive anti-D (eg., code 'PD', 'DPAS', etc.); Probably passive anti-D; Anti-D consistent with RhIg; Anti-D due to RhIg.Depending on the LIS, other variations are possible. | View Page |
| Literature and Online Resources The following published literature and online resources, while useful, should not be used as a substitute for technical and clinical judgment. Medical and technical information becomes obsolete quickly and current sources relevant to the user's location should always be consulted.References indicated by * provide a broad overview of HDFN and are highly recommended.LITERATUREAvent ND, Reid ME. The Rh blood group system: a review. Blood. 2000 Jan 15;95 (2):375-87.Bowman J. Thirty-five years of Rh prophylaxis. Transfusion 2003 Dec;43(12):1661-6.* Eder AF. Update on HDFN: new information on long-standing controversies. Immunohematology. 2006;22(4):188–195. (scroll to article).Eder, AF, Manno, C.S. Alloimmune hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology, 11th ed. (Greer JP, Foerster J, Lukens JN, Rodgers GM, Paraskevas F, Glader BE, (eds). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2004.Flegel WA. Molecular genetics of RH and its clinical application. Transfus Clin Biol. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(1-2):4-12. Kennedy MS, McNanie J, Waheed A. Detection of anti-D following antepartum injections of Rh immune globulin. Immunohematology 1998;14(4):138-40.Koelewijn JM, de Haas M, Vrijkotte TG, van der Schoot CE, Bonsel GJ. Risk factors for RhD immunisation despite antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis.BJOG. 2009 Sep;116 (10): 1307-14. Epub 2009 Jun 17.* Kumar S, Regan F. Management of pregnancies with RhD alloimmunisation. BMJ. 2005 May 28;330(7502):1255-8. (UK perspective but much valuable information relevant to all)* Murray NA, Roberts IAG. Haemolytic disease of the newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007 Mar; 92(2): F83–F88. Oepkes D, Seaward PG, Vandenbussche FP, Windrim R, Kingdom J, Beyene J, Kanhai HH, Ohlsson A, Ryan G; DIAMOND Study Group. Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict fetal anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 13;355(2):156-64.Ramsey G. Inaccurate doses of Rh immune globulin after Rh-incompatible fetomaternal hemorrhage: survey of laboratory practice.Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009 Mar; 133(3):465-9. Reid ME. The Rh antigen D: a review for clinicians. Blood Bulletin 2008 Apr; 10(1).Sandler SG. Effectiveness of the RhIg dose calculator. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010 Jul;134(7): 967-8.Shulman IA, Calderon C, Nelson JM, Nakayama R. The routine use of Rh-negative reagent red cells for the identification of anti-D and the detection of non-D red cell antibodies. Transfusion 1994 Aug;34(8):666-70.Tamul KR. Determining fetal-maternal hemorrhage with flow cytometry. Advance 2000. Posted online June 5, 2000.Westhoff CM, Sloan SR. Molecular genotyping in transfusion medicine. Clin Chem 2008;54(12): 1948-50.ONLINE RESOURCESPaxton A. Bringing new rigor to RhIg calculations. CAP Today May 2008. *Wagle S, Deshpande PG. Hemolytic disease of the newborn. eMedicine / WebMD. Updated Apr. 9, 2010. | View Page |
| ABO, Rh, and Antibody Screen ABO and Rh typing ABO Forward Group ABO Reverse Group Rh anti-A anti-B A1 cells B cells anti-D* 0 0 4+ 4+ 0 * Transfusion medicine standards used in the hospital's region do not require weak D testing on D-negative pregnant patients and none was done.Antibody screen Cells Gel IAT* Screen Cell I (R1R1) 1+ Screen Cell II (R2R2) 2+ Screen Cell III (rr) 0 * IAT = indirect antiglobulin test | View Page |
| Case Presentation Mr. R.M., a 55-year old male, was admitted to a hospital emergency department with severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding. His history revealed multiple prior transfusions, the last of which he received five years earlier.Physical examination revealed hemodynamic instability (systolic BP 60 mmHg). Blood tests revealed a hemoglobin (Hb) of 8 g/dL (80 g/L) and a hematocrit (HCT) of 28% (0.28). The patient received aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer's lactate and was sent to the operating room (OR) for an emergency laparotomy.The physician ordered four units of Red Blood Cells to be crossmatched.Two units of uncrossmatched group O Rh-negative Red Blood Cells were also ordered and authorized for immediate emergency transfusion. | View Page |
| Transfusion Service Laboratory The transfusion service laboratory (TS) instructed clinical staff to draw blood specimens for compatibility testing before transfusing any blood components or products.Once the blood samples were collected, the clinical staff immediately began transfusing the patient with the O Rh-negative blood. | View Page |
| Reflecting on probability of the solution Similar to evaluating inconsistencies, one of the post-analytic tools for confirming that the serological data fit the solution is to consider the "big picture." For example: Is there a likely red cell stimulus (prior transfusion or pregnancy) for IgG antibodies such as anti-Jka? Can different reaction strengths with panel cells be explained by the identified antibody (e.g., dosage) or by the presence of more than one antibody? Is the antibody unusual for a patient of a particular race? For example, anti-Dib is more likely to occur in Native Americans than in Caucasians. | View Page |
| Antibody identification checklist To improve the quality of conclusions when identifying antibodies, a checklist is a simple quality control tool to increase transfusion safety. If a specific antibody pattern cannot be identified with acceptable confidence, or if significant serologic or non-serologic data are inconsistent and cannot be rationalized, further testing will be required.Before concluding that the investigation is complete, unless not applicable, mentally reply to each question in the checklist. If any answer is no, has it been resolved? Antibody Identification Checklist Yes/No/NA 1. For a single antibody, does the reaction pattern fit only one antibody specificity? 2. Is antibody specificity consistent with the results of the initial antibody screen? 3. Are reaction phases consistent with antibody specificity? 4. If multiple antibodies are present, can all reactions be explained by the antibody combination? 5. If the autocontrol is negative, are patient red cells negative for the corresponding antigen(s)? 6. Have additional possible antibodies been excluded by selected red cells? 7. Can all variable reaction strengths be explained? 8. If tested, are antigen-negative donor cells compatible by antiglobulin crossmatch? 9. If there are data that do not fit antibody specificity or if there are results that are improbable, are they explainable? 10. Have all results and conclusions been systematically evaluated for consistency? | View Page |
| As discussed earlier, one of the post-analytic tools for confirming that the serologic data fit the solution is to consider the big picture, as presented below. Think of how you would reply to each question in this case and then click each question to see sample responses. | View Page |
| When performing an antibody investigation, which of the following would indicate an inconsistency that needs to be further investigated? (Select all that apply) | View Page |
| Summary This case study presents a scenario in which a patient had an unexpected antibody that disappeared after he was transfused with 2 units of unmatched group O Rh negative RBC. The patient developed a positive DAT with MFA but an antibody identification using the post-transfusion red cell eluate was inconclusive, making the antibody unidentifiable. Fortunately, the patient improved and further transfusion was not required. Ultimately, the patient's antibody was identified as anti-Jka, with a second antibody to a low frequency antigen (Radin) also unexpectedly present.The case illustrates the risks involved in using unmatched blood. | View Page |
| Risks of transfusing unmatched RBC We often "get away" with transfusing unmatched RBC because the incidence of unexpected antibodies in patients experiencing medical emergencies is thought to be relatively low ( ~3-5% is sometimes cited, but with little solid evidence).Antibody incidence may vary according to several factors: Genetic disposition Patient's underlying disease Number of prior transfusions Gender (females may get exposed to foreign antigens via fetomaternal bleeds as well as transfusion) Concordance of antigen phenotypes of patients vs blood donors in a given locale.In general, antibody incidence increases with the number of transfusions that are given, although most antibody producers will respond within the first 3 - 4 transfusions. Antibody incidence in transfusion-dependent patients, such as those with sickle cell anemia or thalassemia, is very high. Regardless of likelihood, transfusing uncrossmatched blood to a patient with unexpected antibodies can result in a serious hemolytic transfusion reaction. | View Page |
| Balancing the risks Life-Threatening HemorrhageDespite potential risk, sometimes immediate transfusion is necessary, even for patients with red cell antibodies. In such cases transfusion service staff should alert the medical director, who can discuss options with clinical staff.The medical director will generally talk to the staff attending the patient and indicate that, if possible, they should hold off transfusion. But if it is a case of massive bleeding where exsanguinating hemorrhage is likely, it is better to give some blood and monitor for a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction than to let the patient bleed to death.Transfusing when bleeding is brisk will result in much of the autologous and incompatible blood bleeding out, with the possibility of a delayed hemolytic reaction once the patient's antibody rebounds and destroys still present antigen-positive donor red cells.Some transfusion services also try to minimize the risk of unmatched blood by typing their emergency supply of O Rh negative RBCs for the K antigen, since anti-K is a relatively common clinically significant antibody. See Resources for two papers that discuss the risks of transfusing un-crossmatched emergency blood. | View Page |
| Think about your responses to each of the following questions, then click on the questions. | View Page |
| Literature and online resources LiteratureDutton RP, Shih D, Edelman BB, Hess J, Scalea TM. [abstract]. Available at: Safety of uncrossmatched type-O red cells for resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock.J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1445-9. Accessed November 5, 2012.Johnson ST, Rudmann SV,Wilson, SM. Serologic problem solving strategies:a systematic approach. Bethesda, MD: AABB, 1996.Online resourcesThe following are online examples of good practice. The information should not be used as a substitute for technical and clinical judgment. Medical and technical information becomes obsolete quickly and current sources relevant to the user's location should always be consulted.Transfusion reactions: Transfusion complications (Canadian Blood Services)Education website for CBS's hospital customersREACT (Sunnybrook HSC, Toronto, ON, Canada) Pocket reference card for nurseson signs and symptoms of transfusion reactionsQuick cals (online calculator of p values for Fisher's exact test) Use a one-tailed test (since we would expect an antibody to react with red cells that are positive for the corresponding antigen) | View Page |
| ABO, Rh and antibody screen These ABO, Rh, and antibody screen results were obtained by the TS using the blood specimen that was collected prior to starting the emergency transfusion with O Rh-negative RBCs. ABO and Rh typing ABO Forward Group ABO Reverse Group Rh anti-A anti-B A1 cells B cells anti-D 0 0 4+ 4+ 3+ Antibody screen Cells Gel IAT* Screen Cell I 3+ Screen Cell II 2+ Screen Cell III 2+ * IAT = indirect antiglobulin test | View Page |
| The antibody screen is positive but the transfusion of the O Rh-negative RBCs is already in progress. What are the transfusion service (TS) laboratory's priorities in this case?Place the following procedures that will be followed by the TS in the appropriate order of priority. | View Page |
| Crossmatch Results These are the results of the crossmatch that was being performed in the transfusion service laboratory while the patient was receiving the two units of O Rh-negative RBCs. Cells Gel IAT* Donor I** 2+ Donor 2** 2+ Donor 3 3+ Donor 4 3+ Donor 5 2+ Donor 6 3+ * IAT = indirect antiglobulin test ** O Rh-negative RBC (Donors 3 - 6 are O Rh-positive) | View Page |
| Which of the following statements about mixed-field agglutination (MFA) are true? Select all that are correct. | View Page |
| Other post-transfusion tests The patient's post-transfusion plasma was also retested with the 6 RBC that tested positive initially. Like the antibody panel done on the post-transfusion plasma, they are now all negative by gel IAT.Unfortunately, the panel results with the patient's post-transfusion eluate do not give clear results (only cells #1 and #9 react) and the antibody remains unidentifiable. Suppose that the physician had decided to continue transfusing the patient at this stage. Take a moment to think about what you would advise regarding the compatibility of such transfusions, all of which appear to be compatible in the crossmatch. When you have considered the options, continue to the next page. | View Page |
| Follow-up with clinical staff The patient's physician was notified that compatible blood was unavailable and that the patient's antibody was still being investigated.When asked whether or not the patient was experiencing a transfusion reaction due to the transfusion of the two unmatched and incompatible O Rh negative RBC, the nurse in the OR stated that the patient was undergoing surgery and completely sedated. A transfusion reaction was not apparent but they would investigate and closely monitor.Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions (HTR)Before proceeding to the next page, make a short list of signs and symptoms associated with immediate hemolytic transfusions reaction and another list associated with delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions. | View Page |
| Immediate HTR - Signs and symptoms The following signs and symptoms are associated with acute HTR due to ABO incompatibility but can be associated with other blood group incompatibilities. ABO incompatibility typically results from patient misidentification.The more serious symptoms result from intravascular hemolysis (IVH) caused by antibodies such as anti-A and anti-B that can bind complement to C9.Signs and symptoms typically appear within minutes of the transfusion but can occur anytime during the transfusion. They may include: 1. Burning sensation along the vein being transfused (IVH due to complement activation to C9)*2. Lower back pain in the area of the kidneys (renal failure with subsequent oliguria/anuria) *3. Unexplained bleeding/oozing from a surgical site (fibrinolysis following DIC)*4. Hypotension leading to hypovolemic shock (release of vasoactive substances caused by C3a and C5a)5. Tightness in substernal area of the chest (bronchial constriction due to release of vasoactive substances caused by C3a and C5a fragments)6. Other symptoms: fever, chills, skin flushing, dyspnea, wheezing, anxiety, malaise, nausea, headache. * If untreated, these complications may lead to patient death. | View Page |
| Delayed HTR - Signs and symptoms Delayed HTR often go undetected as the symptoms are usually mild and subclinical (death has occurred, but rarely). Symptoms may not occur until days after transfusion when the patient has left the hospital. Donor red cell destruction is usually by extravascular hemolysis (EVH). Signs and symptoms can include: Fever with or without chills Unexplained drop in hemoglobin and hematocrit Transient jaundice due to elevated serum bilirubin | View Page |
| Signs and symptoms - Job Aids Some blood safety standards require that a list of common signs and symptoms of suspected adverse reactions be included in both nursing and transfusion service manuals. Several organizations have developed job aids to help clinical staff recognize the signs and symptoms of various suspected transfusion reactions and to suggest appropriate actions (e.g., see REACT in Online Resources). | View Page |
| Signs and symptoms - Precaution Signs and symptoms are used only as a general guide to the type of transfusion reaction that may be occurring.Lower back pain, for example, would suggest an acute hemolytic reaction, whereas fever is associated with several types of reactions: Hemolytic (immediate and delayed) Febrile Bacteriogenic | View Page |
| Which of the following signs and symptoms is most likely to indicate a severe immediate hemolytic transfusion reaction? | View Page |
| Antibody identification (2 weeks post-transfusion) Fortunately, the patient's condition stabilized and additional transfusions were not required. Two weeks later, new patient specimens were drawn for antibody studies. Antibody identification results Cell Rh Rhesus Kell Duffy Kidd MNSs P Lewis Lu Results Cell C D E c e Cw K k Kpa Fya Fyb Jka Jkb M N S s P1 Lea Leb Lua Gel IAT* 1 rr 0 0 0 + + 0 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 0 + + + +S + 0 0 1+ 1 2 rr 0 0 0 + + 0 0 + 0 + 0 + + 0 + + + +S + 0 0 w+ 2 3 rr 0 0 0 + + 0 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 + 0 0 3 4 r"r 0 0 + + + 0 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 + 0 + + + 0 0 0 4 5 R2R2 0 + + + 0 0 + 0 0 + + + + + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 w+ 5 6 R2R2 0 + + + 0 0 + + 0 + + + + + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 w+ 6 7 R1R1 + + 0 0 + 0 0 + 0 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 +S 0 + + 0 7 8 R1R1 + + 0 0 + 0 0 + 0 0 + + 0 + 0 0 + + + 0 0 1+ 8 9 RZR1 + + + - + 0 + + 0 + 0 0 + + 0 0 + + + 0 0 0 9 10 r'r + 0 0 + + 0 0 + 0 + 0 0 + + 0 + 0 +S 0 + 0 0 10 11 Auto 0 11 | View Page |
| When the patient's plasma was non-reactive with panel cells, and very weak and unidentifiable in the post-transfusion RBC eluate, no attempt was made to try to enhance the weak antibodies.We now know that the patient has anti-Jka and that it disappeared rapidly from the patient's plasma after transfusion with two group O Rh-negative RBC. Consider the question below, then click on the question to receive the answer. | View Page |
| Antigen phenotyping A standard follow-up to antibody identification is to antigen phenotype: Patient's red cells (expecting them to lack the corresponding antigen) Donor red cells (in this case, those transfused before an antibody was identified, or, more typically, to find suitable antigen-negative donors to crossmatch prior to transfusion).If you had wanted to type the patient for any antigens at this point in the investigation (2-weeks post-transfusion), which specimen would you have used? Think about any antigen typing problems and how to overcome them before proceeding to the next page. | View Page |
| Which of the following statements about antigen phenotyping are true? (Select all that apply) | View Page |
| Risks of Transfusion Transfusion of blood components has the potential for both benefit and risk to the patient. According to the FDA Annual Summary of Fiscal Year 2009, 74 fatalities were reported following blood transfusions; forty-four of those fatalities were transfusion-related. Medical errors that could result in transfusion reactions include: Patient misidentification Sample labeling error Wrong blood type issued Transcription error Technical error Storage error Transfusion policies and procedures must be carefully followed to reduce transfusion reactions and prevent transfusion related death or serious injury.Several causes of transfusion-related deaths are summarized in the table below.Reference: U.S Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Fatalities Reported to FDA Following Blood Collection and Transfusion: Annual Summary for Fiscal Year 2009. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/ReportaProblem/TransfusionDonationFatalities/UCM205620.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2011. | View Page |
| Categories of Transfusion Reactions Adverse complications of transfusions can be classified into several categories: Immune-mediated transfusion reactions are those that trigger a response from the patient's immune system. Many transfusion reactions are mediated by the recipient's immune system. These reactions occur as a result of antigen-antibody interactions. Antibodies involved include those with specificity towards antigens on red cells, white cells, or platelets. In general, the immune responses occur in three stages: the immune system detects foreign material (antigen) the immune system processes the antigen the immune system mounts a response to remove the antigen from the body Non-immune mediated hemolytic transfusion reactions are caused by the physical or chemical destruction of transfused RBCs, bacterial contamination, circulatory overload, or citrate toxicity. Acute reactions are those that occur during or within 24 hours after the transfusion. There is usually a rapid onset of symptoms and these reactions may be fatal. Delayed reactions occur weeks or months after the transfusion of blood or blood components. | View Page |
| Incidence Rates of Transfusion Reactions The table below lists the incidence rates of several different types of transfusion reactions.Reference: Hillyer, C.D., Silberstein, L.E., Ness, P.M., Anderson, K.C., & Roback, J.R. (2007) Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine: Basic Principles and Practice 2nd Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone. | View Page |
| In Vivo Red Cell Destruction Important events that occur in an immune-mediated hemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) include: Antibody Binding to Red Blood Cells Antibodies may be either IgM or IgG class. IgM antibodies activate complement and lead to intravascular hemolysis where free hemoglobin is released into the plasma. IgG antibodies rarely activate complement but they are often involved in effecting phagocytosis. The concentration of the antibody is directly related to the severity of the HTR. Activation of Complement The end result of complement activation is red cell lysis. Activation of Mononuclear Phagocytes and Cytokines Sensitized red cells are removed from circulation by mononuclear phagocytes. Macrophages in the spleen and Kupffner cells in the liver are active in this process. Activation of Coagulation Antibody-antigen complexes may initiate coagulation and cause disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Shock and Renal Failure Hemolysis can be intravascular or extravascular. In intravascular hemolysis, free hemoglobin, RBC stroma, and intracellular enzymes are released into the blood stream. This results in hemoglobulinemia and hemglobinuria which can lead to kidney damage. In extravascular hemolysis, there is no release of free hemoglobin. Sensitized red cells are removed from the circulation by the monocytes and macrophages in the reticuloendothelial system. | View Page |
| Iron Overload A unit of red blood cells (RBCs) contained 250 mg of iron as part of the hemoglobin molecule. A long-term complication of red cell transfusion is iron overload, or hemosiderosis. As red cells are destroyed, they release iron. The iron cannot be excreted and is stored as hemosiderin and ferritin. Iron accumulates in the liver, heart, spleen, and endocrine organs. Tissue damage, heart failure, liver failure, diabetes, and hypothyroidism can occur. Patients who are transfused frequently are at the greatest risk for iron overload. Diseases such as sickle cell disease, thalessemia, aplastic anemia, and other chronic anemias usually require frequent transfusions. Signs and symptoms of hemosiderosis include muscle weakness, fatigue, weight loss, mild jaundice, anemia, and cardiac arrhythmias. Ferritin levels and other iron studies should be assessed. Specific stains may be used to detect iron in tissue biopsies. Iron chelation may be used to treat and prevent iron overload. Chelation works by using an agent which binds to iron and helps remove it through the urine or feces. | View Page |
| Preliminary Laboratory Investigation When the laboratory receives notification of a transfusion reaction, the first step is a clerical check. The clerical check should be performed as soon as possible to identify any possible ABO incompatibility. The technologist will compare the component bag, label, paperwork, and patient sample and look for errors. If an error is found, the physician must be notified. Once the post-transfusion sample is received, the sample should be examined for the presence of hemolysis. Both the pre-transfusion sample and post-transfusion sample can be compared. Destruction of red cells and release of free hemoglobin will result in a pink to red supernatant. Pink or red colored serum may indicate intravascular hemolysis. The patient's serum may appear icteric if the hemolytic process is extravascular. The ABO testing must be repeated on the post-transfusion specimen as well. Examination of a post-reaction urine sample made aid in the diagnosis of acute hemolysis. Free hemoglobin in the urine indicates intravascular hemolysis. A direct antiglobulin test (DAT) must be performed on the post-transfusion sample. An EDTA lavender top tube is the required specimen type. If the DAT is positive on the post-transfusion sample, then one should be performed on the pre-transfusion sample. If the pre-transfusion DAT is negative and the post-transfusion is positive, the presence of incompatible red cells should be suspected. All findings must be reported to the supervisor or medical director, who may request additional tests. | View Page |
| Additional Testing If preliminary testing suggests hemolysis or if the results are misleading, additional testing may be required. If human error has been ruled out during the clerical check, repeat ABO/Rh testing should be performed on the unit of blood or its segment and the pre-transfusion sample to detect any sample mix ups and clerical errors. Antibody detection studies should be performed on the pre- and post-transfusion samples to look for any unidentified antibodies. If an antibody is identified, the donor cells should be tested for the corresponding antigen. The crossmatch should be repeated with pre-and post-tranfusion specimens using the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT). An incompatible crossmatch with the pre-transfusion sample indicates an original error, either clerical or technical. Incompatibility with only the post-transfusion sample indicates a possible anamnestic response, as in a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR), or sample misidentification. The patient's first voided urine specimen should be examined for the presence of free hemoglobin. The patient's bilirubin levels may also be evaluated. A change from normal pale yellow serum to a post-transfusion bright or deep yellow serum should prompt an investigation for hemolysis. The maximum concentration of bilirubin following hemolysis is not usually detectable until 3 to 6 hours after transfusion. The hemoglobin and hematocrit can be tested to detect a drop in hemoglobin or failure of the hemoglobin to rise after transfusion. Important information about physical or chemical hemolysis may be gained from examining the returned unit bag. If hemolysis is present in the bag or tubing, a process which affected the blood, such as inappropriate warming or faulty infusion pump, should be suspected. If bacterial contamination is suspected, the unit can be cultured. A positive culture indicates a reaction due to bacterial contamination. | View Page |
| What is the first step a transfusionist should take when a transfusion reaction is suspected? | View Page |
| When performing a transfusion reaction investigation, what is the clerical check used to detect? | View Page |
| Records and Reporting After the medical director has reviewed the laboratory results from the investigation, the interpretation is recorded on the patient's permanent medical record. The transfusion service must retain the records of the test results, interpretations, and reaction classification indefinitely. In the U.S., deaths of patients resulting from a transfusion reaction must be reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by the transfusion service as soon as possible. A written report must follow within seven days. The report should contain the patient's medical records, including laboratory reports and autopsy results. Transfusion services accrediting agencies, such as AABB, the College of American Pathologists (CAP), and the Joint Commission may require reporting to them as well. All of these agencies require that transfusion services have written policies for transfusion reactions addressing the steps for detection, evaluation, and reporting. | View Page |
| Procedure for a Suspected Adverse Reaction Adverse reactions after transfusion of blood components must be evaluated promptly. Most serious reactions occur within the first 15 minutes of starting a transfusion. Continuous monitoring allows reactions to be discovered in a timely manner. The transfusionist must be able to recognize the symptoms of a transfusion reaction and know the appropriate steps to take when one occurs. The first critical step is to stop the transfusion immediately, but keep the patient's line open with saline. The physician should be contacted immediately for instructions regarding patient care. The transfusion service must be notified of the reaction. They will usually provide instructions on proper documentation of the reaction, and the return of any remaining component and/or tubing. The appropriate patient samples are to be sent to the laboratory and usually include blood and urine. The transfusionist must be sure to follow all hospital policies. | View Page |
| Transfusion Reactions: Introduction ".....In the past, a person with blood type O negative blood was considered to be a universal donor. It meant his or her blood could be given to anyone, regardless of blood type, without causing a transfusion reaction. This is no longer a relevant concept because of a better understanding of the complex issues of immune reactions related to incompatible donor blood cells." Reference: Mayo Clinic Health Oasis - Ask a Physician 08/09/2000. As quoted in: Blood types and compatibility. Bloodbook.com; 2005. Available at: http://www.bloodbook.com/compat.html. Accessed April 26, 2011.Transfusion of blood components is generally a safe and effective way to correct hematologic deficits. However, a transfusion reaction may occur and health care providers must be aware of the risks involved with blood transfusions and evaluate the risks against the potential therapeutic benefits. A transfusion reaction can be defined as any adverse event occurring during or after the transfusion of blood components. Adverse events can range from fever and hives to renal failure, shock, and death. Some adverse events can be prevented, but others cannot. | View Page |
| References Harmening, DM. Modern Blood Banking and Transfusion Practices. 5th ed.Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 2005.Hillyer CD, Silberstein LE, Ness PM, Anderson, KC, Roback, JR. Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine: Basic Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.Roback JD, Combs MR, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD ed. AABB Technical Manual. 16th ed. Besthesda, MD: AABB; 2008.Rudman, SV. Textbook of Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Blood Products Advisory Committee. April 27, 2007. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/07/briefing/2007-4300B2_01.htm. Accessed December 15, 2010.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Infectious Disease Tests. 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/ApprovedProducts/LicensedProductsBLAs/BloodDonorScreening/InfectiousDisease/default.htm. Accessed December 15, 2010.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Fatalities Reported to FDA Following Blood Collection and Transfusion: Annual Summary for Fiscal Year 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/ReportaProblem/TransfusionDonationFatalities/UCM205620.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2010. | View Page |
| Causes Acute hemolytic transfusion reactions (AHTR) are caused when red cells are transfused to a patient with a pre-existing antibody that destroys the transfused incompatible red cells through intravascular or extravascular hemolysis. Life threatening acute hemolytic reactions most commonly occur from the transfusion of ABO incompatible blood. Naturally occurring ABO antibodies bind complement on the red cell surface and have efficient lytic properties which cause intravascular hemolysis. Extravascular hemolysis is characterized by antigen-antibody complexes which do not activate complement. AHTRs feature rapid destruction immediately after transfusion. Rapid hemolysis of as little as 10 mL of incompatible red cells can produce symptoms of an AHTR. Signs and symptoms can occur within minutes after starting the transfusion. Fever is the most initial symptom followed by the chills. These reactions are mostly associated with the transfusion of ABO-incompatible red cells. Causes include clerical errors, such as mislabeled patient samples and mislabeled blood products. Although acute hemolytic reactions are rare with an incidence of 1 to 9 in 100,000 transfusions, they are the most dangerous and are severely life threatening. | View Page |
| Clinical Laboratory Tests A post transfusion specimen should be sent to the laboratory for work-up. A clerical check should be performed to investigate possible errors in specimen labeling, blood product issuance, or patient identification. The plasma must be examined for hemolysis. A direct antiglobulin test must be performed. The patient's ABO, Rh and antibody screen should be repeated and confirmed. The blood product ABO/Rh can be confirmed. Other laboratory tests include: complete blood count (CBC), urinalysis, serum bilirubin, creatinine, coagulation profile, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) evaluation. The full laboratory work-up and details of other laboratory tests will be discussed later in the course. | View Page |
| Management and Prevention The first component of therapy is to stop the transfusion immediately. Vital signs must be closely monitored. Management involves treatment of hypotension and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). It is essential to maintain blood volume and adequate renal blood flow. Diuretics, substances that increase urine output, may be administered. If the patient enters renal failure, dialysis must be initiated rapidly. It is impossible to prevent all hemolytic transfusion reactions. The purpose of pre-transfusion compatibility testing is to decrease the probability of a hemolytic transfusion reaction by performing ABO/Rh testing, detecting and identifying alloantibodies, and crossmatching compatible blood. Human error, the most common cause of hemolytic transfusion reactions, cannot be completely eliminated. Steps must be taken to reduce the possibility of human error in identification of patient samples, donor units, and recipients. Each person involved in the transfusion process, from collection of the blood sample to administration of the donor unit, must carefully adhere to each step outlined in the standard operating procedures. All appropriate protocols must be followed. Some examples are: Technologist checks blood sample to ensure proper labeling. Patient's previous transfusion records are examined and all transfusion testing is performed correctly and accurately. Technologist ensures correct unit is released from the blood bank. Transfusionist ensures the recipient is correctly identified.There must be a mechanism in place to train and assess all personnel involved in the transfusion process. | View Page |
| An acute hemolytic reaction may be caused by which of the following? (Choose all that apply) | View Page |
| Febrile Nonhemolytic Transfusion Reactions: Definition/Manifestation/Prevalence A febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) is defined as a temperature increase of 1oC over 37oC occurring during or after the transfusion of blood components. FNHTRs are more common in the transfusion of platelets. Multiply-transfused patients and multiparous women make up the largest populations experiencing this type of reaction. There are two mechanisms involved in the manifestation of a FNHTR. The first one involves the presence of a white cell antibody in the patient's plasma that interacts with the white cells in the blood product. These antibodies may be directed against granulocyte antigens or human leukocyte antigens (HLA). This interaction causes endotoxins to be released, which act on the hypothalamus and stimulate a fever. The second mechanism involves the generation of leukocyte cytokines during product storage. The production of cytokines usually occurs during storage in warmer temperatures, which is why non-leukoreduced platelets are commonly implicated. | View Page |
| Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention Diagnosing a febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR) involves excluding all other options that may present with fever. If this type of reaction is suspected, the transfusion should be stopped. A transfusion reaction work-up should be initiated, although the antibodies involved with these reactions are not routinely identified because of the difficulty in demonstrating their presence in vitro. Antipyretics, such as acetaminophen, should be administered to the patient and the transfusion can continue once the symptoms subside.A patient with two or more documented febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) should receive leukocyte-reduced blood components.Pre-storage leukocyte reduction prevents reactions that occur due to cytokine accumulation during storage. Red cell component prevention techniques include the transfusion of fresher blood or washed blood. For platelets, residual plasma may be removed. Antipyretics can be administered prior to transfusion. | View Page |
| Definition/Manifestations/Prevalence Allergic reactions are grouped into three categories depending on severity: mild or uncomplicated moderate or anaphylactoid life-threatening or anaphylactic reactionsMild allergic reactions occur in about 1-3% of patients receiving blood products containing plasma. Symptoms are usually mild and include urticaria, erythema (skin redness), and itching. Hives can appear any where on the body and may vary in size. Symptoms usually occur within minutes after the start of the transfusion. They can often last for hours or even days. Mild allergic reactions result from a patient's hypersensitivity to soluble allergens in the plasma of the donor unit. The blood recipient forms antibodies to these allergens that are bound to IgE on mast cells and causes the release of histamines. Allergen substances may be drugs or food consumed by the blood donor. Anaphylactoid and anaphylactic reactions have similar presentations. These reactions are rare but life-threatening. Anaphylactoid and anaphylactic reactions are severe systemic reactions with symptoms such as hypotension, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, urticaria, and diarrhea. The most life-threatening symptoms include lower airway obstruction, laryngeal edema, cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, shock, and loss of consciousness. None of these reactions present with fever. | View Page |
| Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention Diagnosis of allergic reactions is based on the recognition of a skin rash associated with itching. Treatment involves temporarily discontinuing the transfusion and administering an antihistamine. The rash will usually heal when the transfusion is stopped or when an antihistamine is given. Once symptoms have been alleviated, the transfusion may be resumed. If symptoms continue or progress, the transfusion must be stopped and a new donor unit obtained. Premedication will usually prevent urticarial reactions in patients with a history of allergic reactions. If premedication is unsuccessful, washed cellular products may prevent a reaction. Leukoreduction has no role in preventing an allergic reaction. Anaphylatic and anaphylactiod reactions should be recognized when patients develop symptoms described on the previous page. The transfusion must be stopped immediately. Differential diagnosis includes hypotensive reactions, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), myocaridal infarction, and pulmonary embolus. An IgA deficiency should be investigated and is confirmed by the presence of anti-IgA. Treatment includes timely administration of epinephrine in addition to other supportive care such as vasopressors and airway support. Prevention involves avoiding transfusion of IgA. Cellular products should be washed to remove residual plasma. Products may also be collected from donors who are known to be IgA deficient. Autologous donations are an alternative. | View Page |
| A febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reaction is characterized by which of the following? | View Page |
| Premedication with antihistamines may prevent an allergic reaction in patients with a history of multiple urticarial transfusion reactions. | View Page |
| Definition and Epidemiology Transfusion-associated acute lung injury (TRALI) is a complication of blood transfusion that results in shortness of breath due to pulmonary edema, fever, and hypotension. The pulmonary edema is noncardiogenic which means it does not originate from the heart. TRALI is a severely life-threatening adverse reaction. Symptoms manifest within 6 hours of transfusion. Products typically implicated in TRALI are Whole Blood, Red Blood Cells, Fresh Frozen Plasma, Cryoprecipitate, and Platelets, with Fresh Frozen Plasma being the most often implicated product. In combined fiscal years 2005 through 2009, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) caused the higest number of reported fatalities (48%), followed by hemolytic transfusion reactions (26%) due to non-ABO (16%) and ABO (10%) incompatibilities. Complications of microbial infection, transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), and anaphylactic reactions each accounted for a smaller number of reported fatalities. TRALI has accounted for the highest number of reported transfusion-related fatalities throughout the first decade of 2000.Cases occur in all age groups and genders. Most patients that develop TRALI have no history of adverse reactions. TRALI is generally under-diagnosed and under-reported and the true incidence may be higher than stated estimates. Under-diagnosing is due to lack of recognition of the condition and that it can be easily confused with other diseases. Also, TRALI may be attributed to the underlying condition of the patient.Reference: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Website. Fatalities reported to FDA following blood collection and transfusion: Annual summary for fiscal year 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/ReportaProblem/TransfusionDonationFatalities/ucm204763.htm. Accessed April 26, 2011. | View Page |
| Clinical Presentation and Laboratory Findings Symptoms begin within 6 hours of transfusion and include acute respiratory distress, severe hypoxemia, hypotension, fever and bilateral fluffy infiltrates on chest radiograph. Respiratory distress is due to noncardiongenic pulmonary edema. Patient may have shortness of breath. Signs and symptoms may be mild, and resolve after a few days, or they may be severe and result in pulmonary failure. Laboratory findings include leukopenia and hypocomplementemia. | View Page |
| Pathophysiology The exact mechanism of lung injury in transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) has not be identified. It is believed that the mechanism may vary from patient to patient. The most common finding is leukocyte antibodies in donor or patient plasma. Anitbodies to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) have been associated with TRALI. These anti-HLA antibodies can be formed in response to exposure to foreign antigens from transfusion or pregnancy. The source of the antibody is usually the donor not the patient. Transfused antibodies react with the recipient which results in leukocyte emboli aggregating in the lung capillary bed. Capillary damage triggers interstitial edema and fluid in the alveolar spaces, causing decreased air exchange and hypoxia. | View Page |
| Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis There are no conclusive tests to diagnosis transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). The condition should be suspected if the clinical picture corresponds with TRALI clinical findings, such as hypoxemia within 6 hours of transfusion. The clinical findings should correlate with chest radiograph findings of bilateral infiltrates. It is important to rule out cardiac causes of pulmonary edema. One way of differentiating is evaluating the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, which is known to be elevated in congestive heart failure and not TRALI. In the majority of cases, the donor plasma will demonstrate anti-HLA antibodies. Urgent treatment consists of respiratory and volume support. Patients usually require supplemental oxygen, some by a mechanical ventilator. Vasopressor medications can be used to treat the hypotension. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and cardiopulmonary bypass have been successful in treating TRALI when conventional methods do not work. Diuretics are contraindicated in TRALI.Patients with TRALI usually improve within 48 to 96 hours. TRALI is fatal in about 5% to 10% of cases. | View Page |
| Evaluation of Donors Associated with Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury (TRALI) The AABB published an interim standard in 2005 that states, "Donors implicated in TRALI or associated with multiple events of TRALI shall be evaluated regarding their continued eligibility to donate." A donor is associated with TRALI when one of his/her donor units is transfused 6 hours before the clinical presentation of TRALI in a patient. A donor is implicated in TRALI if he/she is found to have an antibody to an HLA class I or II antigen and the antibody is specific for an antigen on the recipient's leukocytes or a positive crossmatch is obtained.*It is suggested that donors at greatest risk of developing HLA antibodies be tested, such as multiparous women. It has also been suggested that donors that present with demonstrable antibodies and have been implicated in TRALI be permanently deferred from donating. Studies have shown that donors implicated in TRALI reactions may present a future danger to transfusion recipients. Although, there are some instances where donors with HLA antibodies have not caused TRALI reactions. Another option would be to wash all red cell products from these donors in special circumstances such as rare donors. Reference: Association bulletin #05-09. AABB; August 2005. Available at: http://www.aabb.org/resources/publications/bulletins/Pages/ab05-09.aspx. Accessed November 12, 2010. | View Page |
| Prevention of Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury (TRALI) The AABB has made several recommendations for preventing TRALI including: Blood collection facilities should implement interventions to minimize the preparation of high-plasma-volume components from donors known to be leukocyte-alloimmunized or at increased risk for leukocyte alloimmunization. Blood transfusion facilities should work toward implementing appropriate evidence-based hemotherapy practices to minimize unnecessary transfusion. Blood collection and transfusion facilities should monitor the incidence of reported TRALI and TRALI-related mortality. Transfusion services should work with clinicians to educate providers about the risks of TRALI and about the need to work toward implementing evidence-based transfusion practices for all blood components, with special emphasis on high plasma-volume components. High-plasma-volume components include the following: FFP obtained from whole blood or apheresis Plasma frozen within 24 hours Cryoprecipitate-reduced plasma Apheresis platelets Whole bloodThere have been several other suggestions for preventing TRALI, which include: Screening of all donors for anti-neutrophil or anti-HLA antibodies. Once donors are identified, they are excluded from donating, or their blood is used for products that do not contain much plasma. This method would not prevent TRALI in recipients who have alloantibodies. Use of pre-storage leukoreduced blood. Use of younger blood products. Appropriate utilization of blood products. Using blood products only when clinically indicated may reduce the frequency of TRALI. Because TRALI can coexist with other transfusion reactions and with pulmonary complications unrelated to transfusion, the diagnosis of TRALI is difficult, but it is an important step in monitoring the effectiveness of TRALI risk-reduction strategies. | View Page |
| Presentation and Prevalence Although the risk of acquiring transfusion transmitted viral infections is low due to donor testing, bacterial infections are still reported. Platelets are the most implicated product in bacterial contamination reports because they are stored at room temperature (20-24oC) and provide a favorable environment for bacterial growth. Sespis occurs in about 1 in 25,000 platelet transfusions. It may be fatal in about 1 in 60,000 transfusions. Bacteria can be present in other components as well, such as red blood cells (RBCs), cryoprecipitate, and plasma. Contamination in red cell components is rare with events occurring 1 in 250,000 transfusions. This low incidence is due to the refrigerated storage requirements for red cells at 1-6oC. Because plasma and cryoprecipitate are stored frozen, they are least likey to contain bacteria. Contamination usually occurs when these products are thawed in a water bath that contains bacteria. Reactions range from minimal or no symptoms to fatal septic shock and death. Severity of the reaction depends on the bacterial species involved, the concentration and growth rate of the organisms, and the recipient's immune status. Septic reactions can present with a fever of higher than 38.5oC, rigors, and hypotension that begin during the transfusion. Patients may also have nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, and diarrhea. Septic shock, oliguria, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are also complications. | View Page |
| Bacteria Implicated in Contamination Yersina entercolitica is most likely responsible for septic reactions in transfusions of Red Blood Cells. This organism is usually acquired by ingestion of contaminated food and causes mild symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea. Growth of Y. entercolitica is enhanced in iron-rich environments such as red blood cells. Other organisms reportedly found in Red Blood Cell units are Campylobacter species, Serratia species, Pseudomonas species, Enterobacter species, and Echerichia coli. These bacteria can produce endotoxins which cause a reaction in the patient. The majority of organisms associated with platelets transfusions are normal skin flora. Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylocci, aerobic and anerobic diptheroid bacilli, streptococci, and gram-positive bacilli are frequently isolated. Some transfused organisms have been implicated in a delayed post-transfusion illness. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia capacia have been isolated in cryoprecipitate and plasma. These organisms grow optimally at 30oC and have been found in water baths, accentuating the importance of overwrapping components that are thawed in a water bath. Rickettsia organisms are intracellular bacteria which are transmitted by ticks or insects. These bacteria are the causes of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichiosis, and scrub typhus, and may be transmitted by transfusion. Similarly, the organism which causes Lyme disease may be transmitted as well. There have no reports of either of these organisms transmitted by transfusion. | View Page |
| Reducing Transfusion-Associated Septic Reactions Measures taken to reduce bacterial contamination of blood components include donor screening, improved skin disinfection, diversion of the first aliquot of blood, and pretransfusion bacterial detection. Screening of donors is done by questioning them about fever occurrence and dental or medical procedures that occurred days before donation. Donors who develop symptoms of an infection may be asked to notify the blood bank. Complete skin disinfection is not possible because of organisms living in places that are inaccessible, such as sebaceous glands and hair follicles. Factors affecting skin disinfection are the type and concentration of antiseptic, use or single or multiple antiseptics, method and steps of application, and contact time. Studies have shown that a two-stage method using a sponge scrub and ampule with tincture of iodine is the most effective method. The AABB recommends an initial 30 second scrub with a 0.7% iodophor solution followed by the application of a 10% iodophor compound, which must be allowed to dry for 30 seconds. To avoid normal flora contamination, blood may be diverted into a satellite bag at the beginning of donation. These bags are developed so that backflow is prevented. Blood contained in the satellite bag is used for blood grouping and infectious disease testing. Blood diversion is not a mandatory practice in the United States. The AABB requires that the transfusion service have a method to detect bacteria in all platelet components. Culture-based methods are used at blood collecting facilities near the time of collection. Hospital-based transfusion services use other less costly non-culture based methods such as gram staining or pH and glucose analysis prior to releasing the product for transfusion. Recently, a qualitative immunoassay for the detection of bacteria in platelets has been developed. This test detects antigens on the cell walls of the bacteria. It has been documented to be more sensitive than other non-culture based methods. | View Page |
| Transfusion-Associated Circulatory Overload (TACO) Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is caused by the inability of the circulatory system to handle an increased blood volume. This usually occurs if the product is infused into the patient too quickly. The very young, elderly, patients with small stature, and patients with compromised cardiac function are at heightened risk for circulatory overload. The frequency is difficult to determine since many instances go unreported. The patient will present with acute pulmonary edema when cardiac output cannot be maintained. Other symptoms include, cyanosis , orthopnea, hypertension, headache, tachycardia, chest tightness, and cough. Symptoms set in near the end of the transfusion or within six hours of completion. Symptoms may be confused with transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). Recently, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), a cardiac marker, has been used as a diagnostic tool. BNP is elevated with TACO.The transfusion should be stopped as soon as TACO is suspected. The patient should be in a sitting position and provided with supplementary oxygen. Intravascular volume may be reduced by the administering of diuretics. Blood components should be adminstered slowly when possible, particularly in patients at risk for TACO. | View Page |
| Physical and Chemical Mechanisms of Hemolysis Patients can experience a transfusion reaction caused by a range of physical or chemical factors. These factors can either affect the blood component or result from a transfusion event. These reactions include physical red cell damage, depletion or dilution of coagulation factors and platelets, hypothermia, citrate toxicity, hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, and air embolism. Membrane damage and lysis can occur to red blood cells (RBCs) because of hypotonic or hypertonic solutions, heat damage from blood warmers, and mechanical damage caused by blood pumps. Platelets and coagulation factors may become depleted or diluted from a massive transfusion. Hypothermia, a core body temperature of less than 35oC, can occur from transfusions of large volumes of cold products. Hyperkalemia is caused by the intracellular loss of potassium from the red cells during storage. Hypokalemia may result from transfusion of potassium depleted cells such as washed RBCs. Signs and symptoms of physically or chemically induced reactions are non-specific. Some of the more common signs include: Chills Numbness Nausea Vomiting Cardiac arrhythmias Altered respirations Additional laboratory tests to investigate a reaction are electrolytes, blood pH, glucose, urinalysis, complete blood count (CBC), prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Treatment involves correcting the underlying cause of the symptoms. For example, a patient with hypothermia may be given a heat blanket. Attention to proper transfusion practices will help prevent these types of reactions. | View Page |
| Definition and Incidence Delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTR) are reactions that occurs 3 to 10 days after the transfusion. Usually, the blood appears serologically compatible at initial testing. Delayed reactions are common in patients who have been immunized to a foreign antigen from a previous transfusion or pregnancy, but the antibody titers decrease over time and the antibody is not detectable during pre-transfusion testing. The transfusion leads to a secondary (anamnestic) response, causing increased antibody production that sensitizes antigen-positive donor red cells. Hemolysis is extravascular. Sensitized cells are removed from circulation by the reticuloendothelial system, also called the monocyte-macrophage system. Because there is a delay in the presentation of symptoms, DHTR is not usually considered as a cause of the clinical presentation. The transfusion service usually initiates investigation of a DHTR because of serologic findings in a post-transfusion specimen. DHTRs occur more frequently than acute hemolytic reactions. Approximately 1:2500 transfusions result in a DHTR. | View Page |
| Diagnosis The symptom most commonly associated with a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR) is unexplained decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit. Patients may also present with fever and jaundice. Hemolysis occurs slowly and is primarily extravascular. Unlike an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction (AHTR), hemoglobinuria, acute renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are not generally seen. On some occasions, patient's may not present with any symptoms. Serologic findings include a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and/or a positive antibody screen in post-transfusion testing. In many cases, the physician will send a request for an additional transfusion because of the decreased hemoglobin levels, and not suspect a DHTR. The positive antibody screen will trigger an investigation including antibody identification. The DAT may have a mixed field appearance because of the antibody-sensitized transfused red cells and the non-sensitized patient red cells. Segments from the donor unit can be tested for the offending antigen once the antibody has been identified.Antibodies that are most often reported as the cause of DHTR are anti-Jka and anti- Jkb. Other antibodies that are also commonly implicated in a DHTR include Kell, Rh, and Duffy system antibodies.The patient's physician should be notified so that additional clinical and laboratory evidence can be evaluated. | View Page |
| Severe Delayed Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions (DHTR) Generally, the clinical symptoms of a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR) resolve within 2-3 weeks without medical intervention other than transfusion support. On the other hand, severe DHTRs can occur with a life-threatening anemia. Severe delayed reactions occur most often in patients with sickle cell anemia. Sickle cell anemia patients have a high alloimmunization rate which puts them at greater risk for developing a DHTR. Diagnosis of a DHTR can be difficult in sickle cell patients because symptoms can be misdiagnosed as sickle cell crisis pain. Delays in medical treatment may lead to death. It is important for the transfusion service to obtain an accurate transfusion history. It is unclear what causes such severe reactions in sickle cell patients. Several explanations include bystander hemolysis, sickle cell hemolytic transfusion syndrome, and hyperhemolysis. In any case, it is important to recognize that severe DHTR in sickle cell patients is not uncommon. Treatment requires rapid diagnosis and transfusion support with antigen-negative red cells. | View Page |
| Prevention The most critical aspect of prevention is for the transfusion service to document all clinically significant antibodies. One challenge in antibody detection is finding a rapid method that is sensitive enough to detect low titers of clinically significant antibodies without being too sensitive for insignificant antibodies. Preventing severe reactions in sickle patients can be done by phenotyping the patients. This is useful in providing phenotypically matched blood and solving complex antibody identification problems. | View Page |
| Delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTR) typically occur 3 hours after transfusion. | View Page |
| Definition and Incidence Transfusion-associated graft versus host disease (TA-GVHD) is a rare but highly lethal adverse reaction. The disease has a 90% mortality rate. It is caused by the transfusion of donor lymphocytes to a recipient who is immunocompromised. The donor lymphocytes engraft and escalate an immune response against the host's tissues including organs such as the lungs, skin, intestines, and liver. The recipient is unable to destroy the foreign lymphocytes and the cells proliferate and respond to incompatible antigens in the host. Certain recipients have increased risk for developing TA-GVHD. They are: Neonates less than 4 months of age Fetuses Recipients with a congenital or acquired immunodeficiency Recipients of donor units from a blood relative | View Page |
| Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis Patients present with fever, a characteristic red rash from trunk or face to the extremities, watery diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and hepatitis within seven to ten days following the transfusion. The rash may progress to blister-like lesions and erythroderma. Pancytopenia will develop due to the immune destruction of the recipient's bone marrow. The low platelet count causes hemorrhaging while a low white blood cell count can lead to infection. Most patients die within one to three weeks after the onset of symptoms. The diagnosis is often missed and is usually made too late or after death. Routine laboratory studies are not helpful. The only definitive method is the identification of donor lymphocytes in the circulation or tissues of the recipient which is accomplished through human leukocyte angtien (HLA) typing or cytogenic analysis. | View Page |
| Definition/Manifestation/Prevalence Post-transfusion purpura (PTP) is a very rare complication of blood transfusion. It has been most commonly associated with the transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) and whole blood, but has also been seen in platelet and plasma transfusions. It is characterized by a rapid onset of thrombocytopenia, or decreased platelet count, which results from the product of a platelet alloantibody. Platelet counts are usually less than 10,000/uL. Reactions occur around 7 to 14 days post-transfusion. Patients present with purpura, bleeding from the mucous membranes, gastrointesinal ,and/or urinary tract bleeding. Melena and vaginal bleeding have also been reported. The thrombocytopenia is usually self-limiting. Platelet counts and coagulation studies aid in the diagnosis. Patients can also be tested for platelet specific antibodies, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and lymphocytotoxic antibodies. The differential diagnosis includes other causes of thrombocytopenia. | View Page |
| Pathophysiology, Treatment and Prevention Post-transfusion purpura (PTP) is caused by platelet-specific antibodies in a patient who has been previously exposed to platelet antigens through pregnancy or transfusion. The most frequently identified antibody is Anti-PLA1 which reacts with platelet antigen HPA-1a. The platelet antibody binds to the platelet surface which allows for extravascular removal through the liver or the spleen. The patient's own platelets are destroyed as well, thus aggravating the thrombocytopenia. Three theories are suggested regarding the destruction of autologous platelets. One suggests that immune complexes bind to the platelets through the Fc receptor and cause destruction. The second theory proposes that the patient's platelets absorb a soluable platelet antigen from the donor plasma. The third hypothesis, which has the most support, states that the platelet alloantibody has autoreactivity that develops when the patient is exposed to the foreign platelet antigen. Platelet transfusion is NOT a treatment option. Steroids, whole blood exchange, and plasma exchange are accepted options for treatment. According to the AABB, intravenous IgG (IVIG) is the treatment of choice (AABB Technical Manual, p. 744). Most patients will respond to treatment within several hours to four days. PTP does not usually re-occur but it is recommended that patient's with a previous reaction be transfused with antigen-matched components. Autologous donations or directed donations from antigen matched family members may be the best sources of blood. PTP has been known to occurr even after the transfusion of deglycerolized rejuvenated or washed red cells, so these processes do not prevent a reaction. | View Page |
| Post-transfusion purpura (PTP) is characterized by which of the following? | View Page |