| References Beavers C, Kern W, Blick K. Isolated acute thrombocytopenia in a 21-year-old caucasian male. Lab Med. June 2009;40(6):337-339.Bromberg MB. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura, the changing therapeutic landscape. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:1643-1645. Glassy EF. ed. Color Atlas of Hematology. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists; 1998.Kwon JY, Shin JC, Lee JW. Predictor of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnant women presenting with thrombocytopenia. Int J Gynacol Obstet. 2007;85-88. Taghizadeh, M. An update on immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Lab Med. 2008;39(1):51-54.Tarr PI, Gordon CA, Chandler WE. Shiga like toxin producing Escherichia coli and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365:1073-86.Woelke C , Eichler P. Washington G, etal. Post transfusion purpura in a patient with HPA-1a and GP1a/11a antibodies. Transfus Med 2006;16:69-72. Wyrick-Glatzel J.Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and ADAMTS-13: New insights into pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. Lab Med. 2004;35(12):733-737. | View Page |
| Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is an uncommon, but very serious consumptive platelet disorder. Its cause is unknown, but there are several possible precipitating factors including infection, carcinoma, and pregnancy. More women than men are affected by TTP. If left untreated, the mortality rate is in excess of 90% due to multiorgan failure. Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is also a platelet consumptive disorder. HUS is thought by some to be the same condition as TTP because both disorders have the same underlying pathology. However, HUS is more often associated with renal failure and TTP with neurological manifestations including visual impairment, weakness, headache, dizziness, disorientation. seizures, or coma. Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and fever is associated with both TTP and HUS. The patient's condition can deteriorate rapidly while these symptoms are becoming evident. HUS is usually seen in children; it is the most common cause of acute renal failure in children. Patients may have bloody diarrhea and symptoms resembling colitis. Diarrhea-related HUS is usually associated with ingestion of undercooked beef contaminated with Ecoli O157:H7; it is the Shiga-like toxin from this serotype that causes the illness. Some patients may have long term kidney dysfunction as a result ofthis virulent infection. For patients who have experienced renal failure, dialysis may be required. | View Page |
| Which of the following bacteria is often linked to diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome? | View Page |
| Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a condition that is usually secondary to an underlying disease or condition. Some of the activators of DIC are sepsis, placenta abruptio, snake bites, toxin, trauma, graft vs. host disease, and burns.The mechanisms that are involved in DIC include a hyperactivated coagulation system, a hyperactivated fibrinolytic system, or both simultaneously. In most cases the coagulation factors are consumed as soon as they are made and platelets are also consumed in the coagulation process. Clots are made rapidly and then rapidly destroyed as the fibrinolytic system is hyperactivated. | View Page |
| Review 1 Tuomanen EI.: Pathogenesis of pneumococcal inflammation: otitis media Vaccine. 19 Suppl 1:S38-40, 2000 Pneumococci cause damage to the ear in otitis media with an association with bacterial meningitis. The pathogenesis of injury involves host response to cell wall constituents and the pore-forming toxin, pneumolysin. Release of cell wall constituents, particularly during antibiotic-induced bacterial lysis, leads to an influx of leukocytes and subsequent tissue injury. The signal transduction cascade for this response is becoming defined and includes CD14, Toll-like receptor 2, NFkB, and cytokine production. The second source of injury is the cytotoxicity of the pore forming toxin, pneumolysin. Decreasing the sequelae of otitis can be achieved by an increased understanding of the site-specific mechanisms of pneumococcal-induced inflammation. | View Page |
| Review 1 Garbutt JM. Littenberg B. Evanoff BA. Sahm D. Mundy LM. Enteric carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in patients tested for Clostridium difficile. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 20(10):664-70, 1999 OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for enteric carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) in hospitalized patients tested for Clostridium difficile toxin. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 215 adult inpatients who had stool tested for C. difficile between January 29 and February 25, 1996. RESULTS: 41 (19%) of 215 patients had enteric carriage of VREF. Five independent risk factors for enteric VREF were identified: (1) history of prior C. difficile infection, (2) parenteral treatment with vancomycin for > or = 5 days, (3) treatment with antimicrobials effective against gram-negative organisms, (4) admission from another institution, and (5) age > 60 years. These risk factors for enteric VREF were independent of the patient's current C. difficile status. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial exposures are the most important modifiable independent risk factors for enteric carriage of VREF in hospitalized patients tested for C. difficile. | View Page |
| Case History A 63-year-old man was seen in the emergency room with the complaints of sudden onset of fever, chills, and abdominal pain, accompanied by mild diarrhea. The blood pressure was 140/84, the pulse rate 82/minute, and the body temperature 39.8C. A blood sample was drawn for a complete blood count, and a blood culture. A second blood culture was drawn from the opposite arm, with 10 mL of blood being placed into each an aerobic and an anaerobic bottle, following customary practice. The complete blood count revealed a hemoglobin of 15.8 mg/dL, a hematocrit of 45%, and a white blood count of 4.2/L. The neutrophils were 39%, lymphocytes 45%, monocytes 10%, eosinophils 4% and basophils 2%. The platelet count was 255/L. The patient was admitted to the hospital for further work-up and empiric antibiotic therapy. Within 24 hours after admission, the body temperature had decreased to 38.2C, although the mild diarrhea persisted. A stool toxin test for Clostridium difficile was negative and neither enteric pathogens nor Campylobacter species were recovered in stool culture after 24 hours incubation. Fecal neutrophils were not seen on direct examination. The anaerobic blood culture became positive 36 hours after inoculation. | View Page |
| Review 3 Ladhani S. Joannou CL. Lochrie DP. Evans RW. Poston SM.: Clinical, microbial, and biochemical aspects of the exfoliative toxins causing staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 12:224-242, 1999 The exfoliative (epidermolytic) toxins of Staphylococcus aureus are the causative agents of the staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome (SSSS), a blistering skin disorder that predominantly affects children. Clinical features of SSSS vary along a spectrum, ranging from a few localized blisters to generalized exfoliation covering almost the entire body. The toxins act specifically at the zona granulosa of the epidermis to produce the characteristic exfoliation, although the mechanism by which this is achieved is still poorly understood. Despite the availability of antibiotics, SSSS carries a significant mortality rate, particularly among neonates with secondary complications of epidermal loss and among adults with underlying diseases. | View Page |
| The staphylococcal toxins causing the scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) have as their site of action in which of the following layers of skin: | View Page |
| Biological Agents Biological agents are organisms or toxins that can kill or incapacitate people, live stock, and crops. The three basic groups of biological agents that would likely be used as weapons are bacteria, viruses, and toxins. Biological agents can be dispersed as aerosols or airborne particles. | View Page |
| Category A Agents Category A agents include: Smallpox (variola major) Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) Plague (Yersinia pestis) Botulism (Clostridium botulinum toxin) Tularaemia (Francisella tularensis) Ebola hemorrhagic fever Marburghemorrhagic fever Lassa fever Argentine hemorrhagic fever | View Page |
| Category B Agents Category B agents include:Q Fever (Coxiella burnetii)Brucellosis (Brucella sp.)Glanders (Burkholderia mallei)Venezuelan encephalomyelitisEastern and western equine encephalomyelitisRicin toxin from castor beans (Ricinuscommunis)Epsilon toxin of Clostridium perfringensStaphylococcus enterotoxin B | View Page |
| Agent: Botulism (bacterium) Most likely means of dissemination: Aerosol (eating contaminated food)Primary route of entry: Inhalation (oral)General signs and symptoms: Difficulty with speaking, swallowing, or blurred or double vision, drooping eyelids (ptosis), dilated pupils, dry mouth, decreased gag reflex, weakening of the reflexes (hyporeflexia), abnormal sensations such as numbness, prickling, tingling, and arm or leg weakness.Botulism is caused by a neurotoxin and technically could be classified as a chemical WMD. For our discussion it is placed under biological agents because the toxin is derived from a bacterium. Botulism is potentially life-threatening, producing a characteristic clinical picture of muscular paralysis leading to respiratory failure. Photo courtesy of the CDC archives. | View Page |
| Types of Chemical Agents There are four primary agents that could possible be used in a chemical attack: Lung-damaging or choking agents Blood agents Blister agents Nerve agentsOthers that might be used include: incapacitating agents, riot-control agents, heavy metals, volatile toxins, pesticides, dioxins, explosive nitro compounds and oxidizers, flammable industrial gases and liquids, plus corrosive industrial acids and bases. | View Page |
| What if: Biological Attack Biological attacks involve bacteria, viruses or natural toxins. The effects of toxins can be immediate but for bacteria and viruses the effects may not be apparent for weeks. A bioterrorist may attack by infecting animals, contaminating food and water, spraying bacteria or viruses into the air. In infections such as smallpox and plague, once a few individuals are infected they can further spread the disease from person to person. An attack could also come from through a building's ventilation system, the mail, or even through exposure to an infected terrorist seeking to spread disease during an infectious stage. | View Page |
| Clinical Significance Clostridium difficile is the cause of antibiotic associated diarrhea (AAD) and pseudomembranous colitis (PMC). PMC is an inflammatory disease of the colon caused by toxins of C. difficile.C. difficile produces two potent toxins: Toxin A (TcdA), an enterotoxinToxin B (TcdB), a cytotoxin It is the production of these toxins in the gastrointestinal tract that ultimately leads to disease. There is a relationship between toxin levels, the development of pseudomembranous colitis (PMC), and the duration of diarrhea. For many years, toxin A was regarded as more important than toxin B in the disease process. Later on, disease producing strains producing only toxin B were identified. These strains produced serious disease, and toxin B was found to be responsible for more serious damage to intestinal cells. | View Page |
| Previous Methodologies: Culture and Cell Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay (CCNA) CultureBacterial culture, utilizing selective/differential media, is an effective method for recovering Clostridium difficile. Its drawbacks are the length of time required (up to four days), as well as the inability to distinguish toxigenic strains from non-toxigenic strains. Positive cultures require follow-up testing for the ability to produce toxin.Cell Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay (CCNA) This assay detects the presence of C. difficile toxin in fecal samples. A filtrate of stool sample is prepared and inoculated onto sensitive tissue culture cells. Typically human fibroblast cells are utilized; if toxin is present in the filtrate, it causes the fibroblasts to round up in a characteristic cytopathic effect. To verify that the cytopathic effect is caused by C. difficile toxin (and not some other toxic component or viral agent), the filtrate is also inoculated in parallel onto a second set of tissue culture cells, to which C. difficile specific anti-toxin has been added. Absence of cytopathic effect in the second set of cell cultures provides evidence that the cellular changes in the first set were caused by C. difficile toxin. Although CCNA is considered a gold standard for the detection of C. difficile toxin, it is labor intensive, requires the use of cell cultures, and requires at least 48 hours of incubation. | View Page |
| Previous Methodologies: Antigenic Detection of Toxin and Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) Toxin assaysThe most common laboratory tests for the detection of C. difficile are enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for the detection of C. difficile toxin A and toxin B. The immunoassays are simple to perform, provide rapid results, and are easily incorporated into the workflow of most laboratories. Sensitivities of these tests do NOT compare favorably to culture, cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), or molecular methods. There are many test kits commercially available for detection of C. difficile toxins. Results are available in 15 minutes to 2 hours, depending on the assay. Initially, toxin A was thought to be the toxin responsible for the majority of the effects of C. difficile disease, so most early kits only detected toxin A. With the realization that there are strains that produce aberrant or no toxin A (A-) that are known to produce infection, and more recently toxin B negative (B-) strains, it is now recommended to use kits detecting BOTH toxins.Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) assaysPublished studies have indicated that toxin immunoassays, by themselves, may not provide adequate sensitivity of detection. GDH assays initially attracted attention as a possible means to provide a rapid but more sensitive means for screening for C. difficile.GDH is an enzyme produced by C. difficile. EIAs negative for the GDH antigen have been associated with high negative predictive values. However, positive results are not necessarily associated with a toxin producing strain. A second assay on GDH positive samples is required to confirm the presence of a toxigenic strain. Initially, CCNA assays were recommended as the confirmatory method of choice; molecular methods (PCR for the toxin gene) were subsequently explored for this purpose. | View Page |
| Molecular Methods A 2009 evaluation and comparison of a variety of commercially available toxin detection assays, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assays, the cytotoxin assay, cytotoxigenic culture, and real time PCR for the C. difficile tcdB gene revealed that ALL methods demonstrated a relatively low positive predictive value, which compromised the utility of a single test for laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile. However, of all methods, PCR had the highest negative predictive value, and was considered the optimum rapid single test.Molecular methods for C. difficile are based on the detection of the tcd gene. With the application of real time methodology, results can be available within 2 to 3 hours. These methods are highly sensitive and demonstrate good sensitivity, in comparison to all methods with the exception of toxigenic culture. As the methodologies and instrumentation are developed and improved, they are increasingly adaptable to the environment of a busy clinical diagnostic setting. The BD GeneOhm™ and Meridian illumigene® assays are examples of currently available molecular assays for C. difficile. | View Page |
| Several methods of detection are available for the detection of Clostridium difficile in clinical samples. Which methods have the capability for detection in less than 48 hours? (Choose all that apply.) | View Page |
| What statements are TRUE about the glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assay for Clostridium difficile? (Choose all that apply.) | View Page |
| Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococci are non-motile, non-spore-forming, gram-positive organisms occurring singly, in pairs, tetrads or in clusters resembling grapes. More than 20 species have been identified; three species are significant in their interactions with humans - S. aureus, S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus.The staphylococci are members of the normal flora of the skin and mucous membranes of humans and warm-blooded animals. Colonization of the nares (nostrils) and skin can provide large reservoirs of organisms for transmission. Approximately 25-30% of the general population are colonized by Staphylococcus aureus, mainly in the nasal passages, but the organism can be found in most anatomical sites including the skin, oral cavity and GI tract.Infections are frequently acquired when the colonizing strain gains access to a normally sterile site as a result of trauma or abrasion to skin or mucosal surface. S. aureus infections range from superficial, localized skin infections, such as folliculitis, to deeper, more serious skin lesions and the more serious toxin mediated conditions – scalded skin syndrome and toxic shock syndrome. | View Page |
| Staphylococcus aureus Virulence Factors S. aureus is the most pathogenic member of the genus Staphylococcus; it possesses several factors that contribute to its virulence: Structural components of its cell wall function as a protective barrier, aid in adherence to mucous membranes, and allow the organism to resist phagocytosis. The production of several different toxins Enterotoxins A, D, F (TSST1) Exfoliative toxin ( causing scalded skin syndrome Cytolytic toxins (causing cell & tissue damage). Production of enzymes Catalase – distinguishes staphylococci from streptococci Coagulase – distinguishes S. aureus from other staphylococci Hyaluronidase & lipase – aid in skin colonization/infection spread Beta-lactamase – breaks down the beta-lactam antibiotics, e.g., penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems and monobactams. | View Page |
| Clinical significance of Staphylococcus aureus In general, the infection that develops is dependent on the virulence of the particular strain, the inoculum size, and immune status of the host. Staphylococcal infections are typically suppurative, producing abscesses filled with pus and damaged leukocytes surrounded by necrotic tissue. Skin infections range from superficial - boils, carbuncles and furuncles, to bullous impetigo; largely opportunistic infections that develop as a result of previous injury e.g., cuts, burns, surgical wounds - and scalded skin syndrome (extensive exfoliative dermatitis; also known as Ritter's Disease). Other major infections include pneumonia, osteomyelitis (localized infection of bone), and septic arthritis. S. aureus also causes food poisoning as a result of ingestion of food contaminated with an enterotoxin producing strain (enterotoxins A&D) and the potentially fatal toxic shock syndrome, a multisystem disease most often associated with the use of highly absorbent tampons. Toxic shock syndrome is attributed to another toxin (enterotoxin F – TSST1) released by certain strains of S. aureus.Human staphylococcal infections usually remain localized by the normal host defenses. Foreign objects (fomites) such as sutures or intravenous (IV) lines - are readily colonized by S. aureus from skin and can allow the organism to spread systemically via the blood stream – bacteremia/septicemia - leading to more serious infections. Staphylococcal pneumonia is becoming a frequent complication of influenza. Whatever the mode of entry, the invasive nature of S. aureus always poses the threat of more serious deeper tissue invasion and/or bacteremia and hematogenous spread. | View Page |
| The pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus, as well as the frequency with which this organism produces infections, can be attributed to: | View Page |
| Laboratory Detection of Clostridium difficile Several laboratory methods are currently available to aid in the detection of C. difficile including culture for toxigenic C. difficile (considered the "gold standard" for viable C. difficile detection), detection of Toxin A, B, or both, and molecular detection methods. These methods differ in their sensitivity and specificity and should always be used in conjunction with clinical considerations. To make the diagnosis, it is usually only necessary to submit 1-2 diarrheic (non-formed) stools per episode. Once positive for C. difficile by any laboratory method, there is no need for follow-up assays to make sure the organism or toxins are absent from the initial episode. If assays are performed for subsequent episodes, culture or tissue culture assay for Toxin B are probably most appropriate to avoid the possibility of detecting the initial antigen, toxin, or gene. | View Page |
| Enzyme Immunoassay Methods The most common laboratory tests for detection of C. difficile are enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for detection of C. difficile Toxin A and Toxin B. The immunoassays are simple to perform and provide rapid results. However the sensitivities of these tests are not as good as culture, CCNA, or molecular methods. Only liquid stool samples should be processed. Due to the fact that the colonization rate is high, a positive result with a normal stool sample proves that the patient is colonized with C. difficile but not necessarily infected. There are many test kits available commercially for detection of C. difficile toxins. Results are available in 15 minutes – 2 hours depending on assay. Initially Toxin A was thought to be the toxin responsible for the majority of the effects of C.difficile disease, so most early test kits only detected Toxin A (based on monoclonal anti-Toxin A antibodies) but with the realization that there are strains that produce aberrant or no Toxin A (A-) that are known to produce infection, and more recently Toxin B negative (B-) strains, it is now recommended that a kit is used that detects both toxins. | View Page |
| Stool Culture Stool culture is very effective in detecting C. difficile. Unfortunately, non-toxigenic strains will also grow, requiring strains to be tested for toxin production. The greatest disadvantage to culture is the length of time that is needed before results are available, which may be up to four days. However, antibiotic sensitivity testing following culture is useful for strain-typing that would provide necessary epidemiological information during nosocomial outbreaks.Colonies of C. difficile will appear white, flat, and spreading on blood agar (see top image on the right). Cycloserin- cefoxitin-fructose agar(CCFA) is a selective media that is used for isolation of C. difficile. There is however, no distinction between pathogenic and commensal strains, which all produce yellow colonies with a characteristic "ground glass" appearance. as shown in the bottom image on the right. The characteristic odor of "horse manure" aids in identification of C. difficile. Stool samples are directly inoculated onto CCFA and incubated in an anaerobic atmosphere at 37°C for 48 hours. Large, thin, gram-positive bacilli with spores will be observed on a Gram stain of a typical colony, as shown below. | View Page |
| GDH Antigen Assays Some literature in recent years has suggested that assays for GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase - an enzyme produced by C. difficile) could provide a more sensitive means of screening for C. difficile.Published studies have indicated that toxin immunoassays, by themselves, may not provide adequate sensitivity of detection. Several investigators have examined the utilization of a two step algorithm. This first step is an enzmye immunoassay for the GDH antigen.A negative result for GDH has been associated with a high value for prediction of a true negative result; however, a positive result is not necessarily associated with a toxin producing strain. A second assay on positive samples for detection of toxin production is required in these algorithms. | View Page |
| Cell Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay The Cell Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay (CCNA) was developed to detect the presence of C. difficile toxin in fecal samples.In this assay, a filtrate of stool sample is prepared and inoculated onto sensitive tissue culture cells. Typically human fibroblast cells are utilized; if toxin is present in the filtrate, it causes the fibroblasts to round up in a characteristic cytopathic effect.To verify that the cytopathic effect is in fact caused by C. difficile toxin (and not by some other toxic component or viral agent) the filtrate is also inoculated in parallel onto a second set of tissue culture cells, to which C. difficile specific anti-toxin has been added.Absence of the cytopathic effect in the second set of cell cultures provides evidence that the cellular changes in the first set were caused by C. difficile toxin.Although CCNA is considered a gold standard for the detection of C. difficile toxin, it is labor intensive, requires the use of cell cultures, and requires at least 48 hours incubation. | View Page |
| Various methods have been employed for detection of C. difficile disease: cultivation of the organism, cell cytotoxin neutralization assays, and enzyme immunoassays have all been among the staples of diagnostic approaches. Which statements are accurate characterizations of these assays? | View Page |
| Which of the following approaches for diagnostic testing have been indicated by recent literature? | View Page |
| Future perspectives - CDI/CDAD There is little doubt that antimicrobial use increases the risks for CDAD and certain compounds or classes of compounds are associated with increased risk, however the exact role (risk) of each compound is still to be elucidated. With all pharmaceutical products, use is based on a risk-benefit ratio; that is, if the patient will benefit to the extent that using the particular antimicrobial is warranted, risks associated with its use are accepted as a part of patient management. There are a number of new antibiotics in various stages of development eg nitazoxanide, ramoplanin, though none to date have FDA approval for treatment of CDI.Little is currently known about the relationship between strain virulence, disease severity, and transmission. Also while the role(s) of Toxins A and B in CDI are well established, the role of the Binary Toxin is not well understood and research is necessary to assess its role in C. difficile disease.Monoclonal antibodies against C. difficile toxins are under development as a form of treatment to induce passive immunity in patients.Anti-Clostridium difficile vaccines are also being researched. | View Page |
| Clostridium Species Clostridium are gram-positive or gram-variable, spore-forming, catalase-negative anaerobic bacilli. More than 100 species are currently recognized, though relatively few are encountered in properly collected clinical specimens from humans. There are three types of infection associated with Clostridium species: Non-invasive: Toxin-mediated Invasive: Progressive infection with tissue destruction Purulent disease: Closed space (e.g., in the peritoneal cavity) mixed infection with multiple organisms.Clostridium are well known as the agents of these classic toxin-mediated diseases : DISEASE TOXIN INVOLVED CAUSATIVE ORGANISM Tetanus or "lock jaw" Tetanospasmin Clostridium tetani Myonecrosis/Gas gangrene Exotoxins Clostridium perfringens Botulism (severe food poisoning) Botulin Clostridium botulinum | View Page |
| Clostridium difficile Most Clostridium infections arise from endogenous sources. That is, many of the Clostridium species that are associated with disease in humans are part of the normal intestinal microflora, which is true of Clostridium difficile.The organism was originally isolated in 1935 as a component of the normal intestinal flora of healthy newborns. It was dubbed difficile because the organism grows slowly and is difficult to culture. Early investigators also noted that the organism produced a potent toxin, but the relationship between C. difficile antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) and pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) was not elucidated until the 1970's. PMC is an inflammatory disease of the colon caused by toxins of Clostridium difficile. Normal intestinal flora is an important factor in host response to an infectious microorganism. Resistance to intestinal infection is significantly reduced when there is a reduction in the normal flora as a result of antibiotic treatment. The most common manifestation of this decreased host resistance is the development of PMC. | View Page |
| C. difficile Toxin A and Toxin B Clostridial toxins are among the largest bacterial toxins reported to date and C. difficile produces two potent toxins: Toxin A ((TcdA), an enterotoxin and Toxin B (TcdB), a cytotoxin. It is the production of these toxins in the gastrointestinal tract that ultimately leads to disease. There is a relationship between toxin levels, the development of pseudomembranous colitis (PMC), and the duration of diarrhea. Levels of Immunoglobulin G against TcdA correlate directly with protection from disease following colonization, suggesting that a robust immune response is sufficient for protection from C. difficle-associated diarrhea (CDAD). The role of TcdB is not as well understood. Naturally occurring Toxin A negative/Toxin B positive (TcdA-TcdB+) strains have been identified from clinical isolates, which are capable of causing disease, even extensive PMC, suggesting a role for TcdB in CDAD. Toxin A had always been regarded as more important than Toxin B in infection. However, recent work utilizing mutant C. difficile, strains which did not, or could not produce Toxin A, and which were capable of producing very serious disease has led researchers to completely rethink the roles of Toxin A and Toxin B in CDAD. Toxin B was found to be responsible for the more serious damage to intestinal cells. In addition to the primary virulence factors (Toxin A and Toxin B ), Clostridium difficile also produces a third toxin, binary toxin (CDT). The prevalence of CDT in clinical isolates varies widely and its clinical relevance and role in pathogenicity are still not well defined. | View Page |
| Pathogenisis of C. Difficile-Associated Diarrhea Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea in the United States, with the number of cases rising annually over the last three decades. This is largely due to the increased frequency of antibiotic usage, the development of better detection methods, and the fact that hospital environments are increasingly contaminated with spores of C. difficile. The definition of C. difficile diarrhea includes > 6 episodes of non-formed diarrheic stool per 24 hours, along with prior antibiotic treatment. At least three events must occur in the pathogenesis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD): Alteration of the normal fecal flora Colonic colonization with toxigenic C. difficile Growth of the organism with elaboration of its toxins"Colonization resistance" is the term used to describe the mechanism by which indigenous flora control overgrowth of C. difficile. This resistance may be compromised by the use of antimicrobial compounds, underlying illness, or therapeutic procedures. Infection begins with the ingestion of either the organism itself or spores, usually via the fecal-oral route. Spores in particular are able to survive the acidity of the stomach and germinate in the colon to produce vegetative organisms. Toxinogenic strains subsequently produce Toxin A, Toxin B, and/or the Binary Toxin leading to colitis, pseudomembrane formation, and watery diarrhea. Significant complications of the clinical disease associated with infection are hypoalbuminemia, toxic megacolon (acute toxic colitis with dilatation of colon), and pseudomembranous colitis (PMC). | View Page |
| Strain BI/NAP1/027 In the early 2000's researchers in Quebec, Canada noticed an increase in the number of colectomies being performed as a result of an increase in the frequency and severity of CDAD. At around the same time, doctors at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were receiving reports of increased frequency and severity of disease in the United States. There were also reports of more disease and more severe forms of C. difficile infection in other areas of the world, suggesting that the experience was very widespread and possibly global. In 2004, analysis of this hypervirulent strain showed a very characteristic strain that had previously been rare but was responsible for the majority of the more serious outbreaks. This strain – BI/NAP1 /027 – has several designations depending on which biological property was examined :- BI: Restriction Endonuclease Analysis (USA)- NAP1: North American PFGE Type 1 based on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (USA) - 027: Ribotype 027 by polymerase chain reaction (Europe)There are 5 unique features associated with this strain – It produces the classic toxins A & B, but faster and at much higher levels than other strains. It is Toxinotype III in contrast to the more typical clinical isolates, which tend to be Toxinotype 0. tcdC is deleted from the PaLoc, possibily explaining the observed increase in toxin production. It produces the binary toxin CDT, but its role is still unclear. It exhibits high level in vitro resistance to fluoroquinolones. | View Page |