Conclusion: Case Studies

Case Study 9

  • The setting is automated chemistry department, night shift, busy core laboratory for a hospital based outreach laboratory. A medical technologist who operates the automated chemistry analyzer on third shift encounters short samples a couple of times a night. When this happens, he runs as many of the ordered tests as he can and fills in the blank results with a comment indicating that a short sample occurred. As far as he knows there isn't a policy that addresses this problem directly.
  • The test reports out with the results and the comments. The technologist does not have to change the physician order in any way and is providing the maximum results that can be reported for the specimen in a timely fashion. This is done as a matter of patient care and quality service. There has not ever been a complaint about this practice as far as he knows. Are there any additional steps this technologist should be taking?
  • Correct Answer: The technologist should follow the procedures that the laboratory has in place for testing and billing samples for which there is no order or for ambiguous orders. If the policies do not seem to address his particular situation, he thinks there should be a separate policy to cover this situation or has a question about it, he should talk to his supervisor or to the laboratory compliance officer
  • Discussion: This choice addresses the problem in the most complete manner, in that the employee fulfills his responsibility to take action when he thinks there is a problem.

Meet OSHA laboratory safety and compliance requirements with over 40 online courses for clinical laboratories. Learn more.

Medicare Compliance for Clinical Laboratories course details »

Learn more about laboratory continuing education for ASCP, AMT, NCA, and state renewal and recertification requirements »

Get information on OSHA laboratory safety courses for clinical and medical laboratories »