| Guidelines for standard reports In a study on the reporting of red blood cell morphology abnormalities conducted in Ontario, Canada (Hookey L, Dexter D, Lee DH, Laboratory Hematology 7:83-88, 2001), fewer than 50% of 33 participants used the same term to describe the quantitative frequency of peripheral blood abnormalities. Seven blood smears, each containing one of several abnormal erythrocytes-- schistocytes, teardrop cells, acanthocytes, and Howell-Jolly bodies--were evaluated by 32 participants. The participants were asked to document their evaluations from a list of quantitative terms. There was a heterogeneity in the use of terms "rare," "slight," "occasional," "few," "mild", "present," "moderate," "many," and "marked." Choices of terms were subjective without points of reference. Guidelines for establishing standardized qualitative estimations of abnormal erythrocytes in the peripheral smear are presented as follows: 1+ = 2 - 4/Oil Immersion Field (OIF) 2+ = 5 - 7/OIF 3+ = 8 - 10/OIF 4+ = >10/OIF. The terms "few," "moderate," "many," and "marked" may be substituted for the 1+ - 4+ grading system, but only when their specific points of reference are universally understood in tandem with the above guidelines. A comment should be triggered if any erythrocyte abnormalities are seen in numbers >3/OIF including, but not limited to, polychromasia, basophilic stippling, nucleated RBC's, and Howell-Jolly bodies. Rouleaux or RBC agglutination are important findings and must be documented. | View Page |