Phenotype Information and Courses from MediaLab, Inc.

Vancomycin and ampicillin resistance among Enterococcus species, particularly E. faecium have been on a steady increase. The disk diffusion screening test is used in many laboratories to detect vancomycin resistant strains. Note in the upper image that no zone of inhibition is seen around either the vancomycin or the ampicillin disk, indicating resistance to both drugs. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) have been divided into three phenotypes--Van A, Van B, and Van C. Vancomycin-resistant strains of E. faecalis and E. faecium are commonly of the Van A phenotype, demonstrating high level resistance (MIC's higher than 64 ug/mL), as illustrated by total resistance of the test strain in the E test and the VA disk, as illustrated in the lower image. The strain shown in the lower image, however, is ampicillin susceptible at the level of 1 ug/mL (see lower set of yellow arrows), indicating that this drug may be effective in treating the urinary tract infection.

When LDL is resolved with electrophoresis, it reveals several subfractions. These subfractions are simply different size populations of LDL particles. Age, gender and lipid status can all affect the LDL subfractionation profile. Individuals who have less dense (so called 'buoyant') LDL have most of their LDL in subfractions 1 and 2. These results are referred to as pattern or phenotype "A" and are normal. Those with significant amounts of subfractions 3- 7 (more dense particles) are at higher cardiovascular risk. These patients have pattern or phenotype "B". The B pattern rarely occurs as an isolated disorder. It is usually accompanied by characteristics of the metabolic syndrome: hypertriglyceridemia, reduced HDL-C , abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, etc.

Adverse drug reactions are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Drug metabolism is a process whereby drugs are delivered to the body, distributed, metabolized and then ultimately excreted. As there can be potentially significant differences between patient drug absorption, metabolism and excretion, molecular testing allows a physician to work with a patient's individual phenotype and/or genotype to deliver an optimum pharmaceutical selection and/or dosage.

If a pregnant woman is found to have an unexpected clinically significant antibody, routine antenatal serologic tests on the mother include Antibody identification to detect clinically significant antibodies. Antigen typing: Once the antibody is identified, the mother is tested for the corresponding antigen, which she should lack. Antibody titration: Laboratories have different protocols. Depending on the antibody titer, titration may be performed at 2 or 4 week intervals after 18 weeks gestation.Notes (titration): Maternal antibody titer is an unreliable indicator of fetal disease and is mainly done to determine if clinical fetal monitoring is warranted, e.g., Doppler ultrasonography of fetal cerebral blood flow or, more rarely, invasive monitoring such as amniocentesis. Careful quality control is needed for titrations. QC includes using red cells from donors with the same phenotype or likely genotype (e.g., R2r or R2R2) and titrating the new sample in parallel with the prior sample. A two-tube rise or more in a doubling dilution is considered a significant rise in titer. In the case of anti-D, a predetermined critical titer (often 16 or 32 for anti-D depending on the method) indicates the need for clinical fetal monitoring.

As noted, policies for administering RhIg to mothers with a variant of D vary among countries and within some countries. An Rh(D) red blood cell phenotype with a weak or variant expression of the D antigen occurs in 0.2% to 1% of whites and is slightly more common in African Americans. The phenotype is routinely called weak D, although several variants exist. A simple model includes these D variants: 1. Weak DMultiple weak D variants exist. Red cells have fewer D antigens/red cell (quantitative difference) and only minor variations in D antigen proteins. Some, but not all, weak D phenotypes are detected by today's Rh typing sera and may be classified as Rh positive or Rh negative by routine testing but will be positive when a weak D test (IAT with anti-D) is done. An extreme form of weak D is the Del phenotype, in which the D antigen is so weakly expressed that it may be demonstrated only by adsorption and elution of anti-D. Weak D individuals do NOT produce anti-D and can be considered to be Rh positive for transfusion and RhIg purposes.2. Partial DPartial D variants have altered Rh(D) proteins that differ sufficiently from normal D antigens (qualitative difference) to allow anti-D production. Partial D red cells may react with some but not all anti-D typing reagents. There are many categories of partial D antigens (e.g., DIIIa, DVI, DAR), each with a unique genetic basis.Some persons with partial D have weakly expressed D epitopes and are designated "partial weak D."In practice, partial D and weak partial D can be considered similarly, i.e., ideally they should be transfused with Rh negative RBC and are candidates to receive perinatal Rh immune globulin depending on the policy in their location.

For reasons as yet unknown, not all individuals who are homozygous for the C282Y mutation display phenotypic features of HH, and persons with H63D polymorphisms rarely develop iron overload. The penetrance (percentage of individuals with a specific genotype who express the associated phenotype) of HFE mutations is generally considered to be low. Results of a recent meta analysis by the US Preventive Services Task Force conclude that 38% to 50% of all C282Y homozygotes develop some evidence of iron overload, but that only 10% to 33% develop clinical disease due to HH. (8) In other words, some individuals may have elevated iron test results such as transferrin saturation, but do not demonstrate significant organ damage. Estimates of penetrance in some studies have found it to be even lower. Penetrance of HFE mutations is currently a controversial subject among experts, and the significance of finding HFE mutations in a given individual is often unclear. The probability that a given individual with HFE mutations will develop clinical disease from iron overload cannot be determined at this time.

In regards to glycopeptide resistance, there are six phenotypes, three of which are more commonly occurring. The VanA phenotype has an inducible high level resistance to vancomycin as well as teicoplanin (encoded by the VanA gene). The VanB phenotype (encoded by two vanB genes) has moderate to high resistance to vancomycin only. The VanC phenotype (encoded by two vanC genes) demonstrates a non-inducible low level resistance to vancomycin. Van A and Van B are the most clinically significant phenotypes and are usually seen among Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolates. Van C is both intrinsic and characteristic in E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. Because they are intrinsic rather than acquired, they represent a different impact/significance for hospital epidemiology; definitive speciation can have significance for infection control purposes.At the present time, both ampicillin and vancomycin resistance occur more frequently with E. faecium isolates than with E. faecalis. Most vancomycin resistant E. faecium strains possess the vanA gene.

When discussing PGx, we classify a person according to his/her phenotype (metabolic capacity for a given enzyme).A poor metabolizer (PM) is a person who lacks the functional enzyme and therefore exhibits decreased metabolism of drugs. This person would require lower doses of a drug that is metabolized by that enzyme. A PM who receives a standard dose is more likely to experience unwanted side effects or toxicity. A PM can also experience diminished effects with drugs that need to be metabolized to active compounds by the enzyme in question.An ultrarapid metabolizer (UM) will require a higher dose than usual since he/she will eliminate the drug more quickly. A UM may be resistant to standard treatments, and it may take some time to adjust the dosage before therapy is achieved.An intermediate metabolizer (IM) has one wild-type (normal) copy of the gene and one absent or dysfunctional copy. The IM group is very heterogeneous.A person with normal enzyme activity is referred to as an extensive metabolizer (EM). This person should respond to standard dosages of a drug. Most people are EM's. This is the population in which most dosing regimens have been worked out in clinical trials.

Phenotyping involves measuring the metabolism of a probe drug. For example, with CYP2D6, dextromethorphan or debrisoquine can be given to a patient to see how well the drug is metabolized. Both these drugs are safe and extensively metabolized by CYP2D6. By measuring the parent drug and the metabolite in urine, the metabolic capacity of a CYP450 enzyme can be estimated. Such testing is complex and tedious, however, and has not become routine in clinical laboratories. Therefore, genotyping is likely to be the main tool that is used for assessing the PGx of a patient.

As noted, policies for administering RhIg to mothers with a variant of D vary among countries and within some countries. An Rh(D) red blood cell phenotype with a weak or variant expression of the D antigen occurs in 0.2% to 1% of whites and is slightly more common in African Americans. The phenotype is routinely called weak D, although several variants exist. A simple model includes these D variants: 1. Weak DMultiple weak D variants exist. Red cells have fewer D antigens/red cell (quantitative difference) and only minor variations in D antigen proteins. Some, but not all, weak D phenotypes are detected by today's Rh typing sera and may be classified as Rh positive or Rh negative by routine testing but will be positive when a weak D test (IAT with anti-D) is done. An extreme form of weak D is the Del phenotype, in which the D antigen is so weakly expressed that it may be demonstrated only by adsorption and elution of anti-D. Weak D individuals do NOT produce anti-D and can be considered to be Rh positive for transfusion and RhIg purposes.2. Partial DPartial D variants have altered Rh(D) proteins that differ sufficiently from normal D antigens (qualitative difference) to allow anti-D production. Partial D red cells may react with some but not all anti-D typing reagents. There are many categories of partial D antigens (e.g., DIIIa, DVI, DAR), each with a unique genetic basis.Some persons with partial D have weakly expressed D epitopes and are designated "partial weak D."In practice, partial D and weak partial D can be considered similarly, i.e., ideally they should be transfused with Rh negative RBC and are candidates to receive perinatal Rh immune globulin depending on the policy in their location.

Some TS laboratories try to determine if anti-D is passive or immune by performing titrations to determine the titer of the anti-D. Such a protocol usually assumes that an anti-D titer greater than 4 likely represents active immunization. Unfortunately, a titer of 4 or 8 could be active or passive, although a high titer (e.g., 64 or more) almost certainly means the anti-D is immune.Titration results can be affected by several variables: Red cell phenotype; Donor antigen variability (even if the same phenotype); Method used; Operator variability.Because lower titers could be due to both passive and immune anti-D, in the absence of test results that suggest immune anti-D, routine antibody titration is not a good use of time compared to assuming that anti-D is passive. Most transfusion medicine best practice guidelines do NOT recommend routine titration for women known to be injected with RhIg and exhibiting a 2+ or less reaction with D+ red cells, i.e., test results consistent with RhIg-derived passive anti-D.