Penetrance Information and Courses from MediaLab, Inc.
These are the MediaLab courses that cover Penetrance and links to relevant pages within the course.
Learn more about laboratory continuing education for medical technologists to earn CE credit for AMT, ASCP, NCA, and state license renewal and recertification. Or get information about laboratory safety and compliance courses that deliver cost-effective OSHA safety training and continuing education to your laboratory's employees.
| Incomplete Penetrance For reasons as yet unknown, not all individuals who are homozygous for the C282Y mutation display phenotypic features of HH, and persons with H63D polymorphisms rarely develop iron overload. The penetrance (percentage of individuals with a specific genotype who express the associated phenotype) of HFE mutations is generally considered to be low. Results of a recent meta analysis by the US Preventive Services Task Force conclude that 38% to 50% of all C282Y homozygotes develop some evidence of iron overload, but that only 10% to 33% develop clinical disease due to HH. (8) In other words, some individuals may have elevated iron test results such as transferrin saturation, but do not demonstrate significant organ damage. Estimates of penetrance in some studies have found it to be even lower. Penetrance of HFE mutations is currently a controversial subject among experts, and the significance of finding HFE mutations in a given individual is often unclear. The probability that a given individual with HFE mutations will develop clinical disease from iron overload cannot be determined at this time. | View Page |
| How is the issue of penetrance of HFE mutations currently viewed? | View Page |
| Screening Controversies The subject of screening for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is controversial and is currently being debated in the medical literature. Using laboratory tests to screen the asymptomatic general population is currently not recommended due to issues of testing costs, low genetic penetrance, and the possible risk of discrimination. Targeted case finding in select high risk populations such as men of Northern European ancestry may be a better approach to screening. (12)Molecular-based (DNA) assays required for confirmation of HH are costly when used for general population screening. Because recent studies have shown that a high percentage of persons with C282Y mutations do not develop iron overload or HH-related clinical conditions, screening for these mutations may falsely label an individual with a disease diagnosis. At the present time, it is impossible to determine which homozygotes or heterozygotes for HFE mutations will eventually develop iron overload. Furthermore, there is potential risk of discrimination in obtaining health insurance for persons identified as having genetic disorders.In contrast, some experts do advocate for screening the general population. Mutations associated with HH are very common in Caucasians in the US. Individuals who know they carry mutations associated with HH may benefit from periodic testing for iron overload. Finally, laboratory tests that assess iron status are relatively inexpensive, widely available, and offer one approach to screening for phenotypic expression of HH. Screening first-degree family members of a person with documented HH is generally considered to be worthwhile. Early detection of HH in relatives with common mutations may permit treatment before the development of substantial iron overload and related disease due to organ damage. | View Page |
| What is one established reason supporting general population screening for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |