| General Overview of Testing Tests for evaluating iron metabolism are generally used as initial or screening tests for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) as they will detect the phenotypic expression of HH. These tests include serum iron (SI), transferrin (Tf) or total iron binding capacity (TIBC), serum ferritin (SF), and unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC).The serum ferritin assay is also used to assess the effectiveness of HH treatment.Molecular (DNA) analyses for HFE mutations are considered to be confirmatory tests for HH which may be ordered reflexively in patients with elevated iron results. Laboratories should establish their own reference intervals for assays of iron metabolism. In general, reference intervals vary by sex and by method used for the assays discussed in the following section. Typical reference intervals are included in the following sections for instructive purposes only and should not be used for evaluating actual patient data.The results of laboratory tests assessing iron metabolism should be interpreted with caution because a number of pre-analytical and physiologic factors can affect the results. Repeating elevated test results on fasting specimens is often advisable. | View Page |
| Which laboratory assay is considered to be a confirmatory test for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| HFE and Other Genes A hemochromatosis gene, HFE, was identified in 1996. Mutations in the HFE gene are found in the majority of patients diagnosed with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH). The locus for the gene is on the long arm of chromosome 6 where it codes for a membrane protein, HFE. The exact mechanism of the role of HFE protein in iron metabolism is incompletely understood. It is thought that HFE, along with a second protein, beta-2 microglobin, interacts with transferrin receptors (TfR) on cell membranes. This interaction supresses the affinity of transferrin for TfR, thus lowering the uptake of transferrin--and its attached iron--into the cell. Transferrin receptors have been found on the surface of a variety of cells, with the greatest concentration on cell membranes of intestinal cells, hepatocytes, and RBC precursors. In addition to HFE, HH is also associated with mutations in other genes involved in iron homeostasis, including hemojuvelin (HJV), TfR, hepcidin, and ferroportin. Hepcidin production is reduced in HH due to all of these genetic causes, with a resulting increase in iron absorption. Mutations in HFE are the most common cause of HH. | View Page |
| Mutations in which gene account for the majority of cases of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| Specific HFE Mutations Several mutations of the HFE gene have been described. In the C282Y mutation, a base substitution leads to a change in the amino acid in position 282 from cysteine (C) to tyrosine (Y). The loss of the sulfhydryl-containing amino acid disrupts the tertiary structure of HFE so that it no longer binds to beta-2 microglobulin. Beta-2 microglobulin appears to act along with other proteins to chaperone the newly synthesized HFE out of the Golgi apparatus and to the cell surface where it can then bind to TfR. In the C282Y mutation, HFE remains in the Golgi, never making it to the cell surface. The result is that transferrin binding to TfR is enhanced and excessive amounts of iron enter the cells of the small intestine, liver, and other tissues. A second mutation, H63D, causes a histidine (H) residue in position 63 to be replaced by aspartic acid (D). The mechanism by which this mutation leads to increased iron uptake is less well understood when compared to the C282Y mutation. Unlike the C282Y mutation, the H63D mutation does not seem to affect the binding of beta-2 microglobulin and intracellular movement, since detectable concentrations of the mutated protein are found on cell membranes. Some researchers speculate that the H63D mutation affects the binding of proteins involved in iron regulation and uptake at the cell surface.A third mutation, S65C, leads to a serine-to-cysteine substitution in its associated protein. This mutation has been been found in some compound heterozygotes for C282Y or H63D, but is rarely associated with iron overload in HH.Additional mutations of HFE have been identified, but their clinical significance is unclear. Most laboratories performing molecular assays test for only the C282Y, H63D, and S65C mutations. | View Page |
| How is the function of HFE protein altered in the C282Y mutation? | View Page |
| Which of the following does NOT represent an HFE mutation? | View Page |
| Epidemiology of HFE Mutations The prevalence of common HFE mutations among persons with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) has been reported in numerous studies conducted in the US, France, Australia, and other countries. Homozygous C282Y mutation (C282Y/C282Y) is present in 82% to 90% of Caucasian patients diagnosed with iron overload due to HH.(7) This suggests a strong link between the genotype and the phenotypic presentation of clinical iron overload. Much lower percentages of persons diagnosed with HH do not have two C282Y mutations. A small percentage of persons diagnosed with HH are compound heterozygotes for C282Y and H63D (C282Y/H63D), are homozygous for H63D (H63D/H63D), heterozygous for C282Y (C282Y/wild type) or for H63D (H63D/wild type), or carry S65C or other HFE mutations.It may be that symptomatic heterozygotes are actually HFE-compound heterozygotes with additional unidentified mutations modifying the expression of the more severe known mutation. It is quite possible that more mutations of HFE and elucidation of other gene mutations modifying HFE will be discovered in the future enabling scientists to better explain the phenotypic heterogeneity of this disorder.In the US, the C282Y mutation is most prevalent in the non-Hispanic white population. It is much less common among Hispanics and African Americans. | View Page |
| Incomplete Penetrance For reasons as yet unknown, not all individuals who are homozygous for the C282Y mutation display phenotypic features of HH, and persons with H63D polymorphisms rarely develop iron overload. The penetrance (percentage of individuals with a specific genotype who express the associated phenotype) of HFE mutations is generally considered to be low. Results of a recent meta analysis by the US Preventive Services Task Force conclude that 38% to 50% of all C282Y homozygotes develop some evidence of iron overload, but that only 10% to 33% develop clinical disease due to HH. (8) In other words, some individuals may have elevated iron test results such as transferrin saturation, but do not demonstrate significant organ damage. Estimates of penetrance in some studies have found it to be even lower. Penetrance of HFE mutations is currently a controversial subject among experts, and the significance of finding HFE mutations in a given individual is often unclear. The probability that a given individual with HFE mutations will develop clinical disease from iron overload cannot be determined at this time. | View Page |
| How is the issue of penetrance of HFE mutations currently viewed? | View Page |
| Prevalence of HFE The C282Y mutation is common in the Caucasian population, especially in people of northern European descent. Approximately 10% of Caucasian Americans are heterozygous carriers of a single C282Y mutation.(8) A greater percentage are carriers of the H63D mutation, but this mutation is much less clinically significant. Hereditary hemochromatosis appears to be most prevalent among people in the Northern British Isles--Scotland, Ireland and Great Britain--who are of Celtic descent. Persons of Celtic descent in the United States, Australia, and France also have a relatively high incidence of HH. The prevalence of HFE mutations in African Americans and Hispanic Americans is low. | View Page |
| What percentage of Caucasians in the United States carry at least one C282Y mutation? | View Page |
| Non-HFE Mutations Genes in addition to HFE have been linked to hereditary hemochromatosis (HH). They include the hepcidin, hemojuvelin, transferrin receptor, and ferroportin genes. Mutations of some are linked with dominantly inherited HH, juvenile HH, and African iron overload. Unlike HH due to HFE mutations, these clinical disorders are rarely observed in the US population.(9) | View Page |
| How do the frequency of HFE mutations and non-HFE mutations compare as a cause of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) in the US population? | View Page |
| General Clinical Considerations Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is frequently discovered only during management of associated illness or routine health evaluations. It has been estimated that only a small percentage of all affected persons are actually diagnosed. Individuals with HH may be symptomatic for several years prior to diagnosis and may have consulted multiple health care providers.Under-diagnosis of HH is thought to occur due to:• Lack of specificity of early signs and symptoms• Asymptomatic status of some patients until damage to organs and tissues has occurred• Confusion with liver disease due to other causes• Insufficient awareness and knowledge of HHEarly identification of persons with HH is essential to prevent serious and irreversible complications associated with severe iron overload. A classic triad of skin hyperpigmentation (bronzing), type 2 diabetes, and hepatic cirrhosis has long been recognized as evidence of advanced iron overload. However, persons with HH may present with a much wider variety of signs and symptoms, particularly if they are seen before significant iron accumulation has occurred. Age of presentation and disease severity are highly variable. A diagnosis of HH is based on laboratory evidence of iron overload, genetic mutations associated with HH, and presence of clinical signs and symptoms consistent with HH.(10) | View Page |
| Secondary Disorders of Iron Overload In addition to hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), there are other conditions of iron overload that must be considered in a differential diagnosis. Disorders such as sickle cell disease, thalassemia, sideroblastic anemia, congenital dyserythropoietic anemia, and liver disease may also cause iron overload. Transfusion-dependant patients and persons who abuse iron-containing vitamin supplements are also at risk. These conditions are usually described as secondary iron overload, in contrast to the primary iron overload of HH.Patient history, clinical signs and symptoms, biochemical and hematologic laboratory analyses, and possibly results of a liver biopsy may be needed to establish a diagnosis of a condition causing secondary iron overload. DNA tests for common HFE mutations are very likely the most important diagnostic tool for identifying HH as the cause of iron overload. In some patients, both secondary causes and HH may be contributing to iron overload. Differentiating the secondary causes of iron overload from HH is heavily dependent on the results of laboratory assays, but a complete discussion is beyond the scope of this course. | View Page |
| Diagnosing HH The diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is made through a combination of laboratory tests and medical evaluation of a patient's signs and symptoms. Iron overload is identified by tests that evaluate iron metabolism, while molecular assays are needed to document mutations in the HFE gene or others such as hepcidin, hemojuvelin, or transferrin receptor. Individuals with documented iron overload who exhibit signs and symptoms consistent with HH and who possess HFE or other mutations are considered to have HH. Other causes of secondary iron overload may need to be ruled out.An example of a testing algorithm is shown. | View Page |
| Which of the following is (are) needed for a diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| What is the major determinant of prognosis for patients with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| Serum Ferritin Serum ferritin (SF) level reflects the amount of storage iron in tissues. An elevated SF combined with elevated TS implies primary iron overload. Patients with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) generally show increases in SF as adults, but a normal SF does not rule out the diagnosis of the disease. Children and premenopausal females with HFE mutations may have had inadequate time to develop iron overload, but may do so later in life.SF alone is inadequate as the sole screening test for HH because it lacks the necessary sensitivity and specificity. SF is frequently elevated in persons with inflammation, cancer, or infection. SF is often ordered along with the serum iron and TIBC when iron overload is suspected. SF is also important is assessing the efficacy of treatment of HH.Upper limits of reference intervals for SF are 200 ng/mL for premenopausal women and 300 ng/mL for men and postmenopausal women. 40 ng/mL is a typical lower limit for the reference interval.SF is measured in serum using immunochemical methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoradiometric assay, immunochemiluminescent assay, and immunofluorometry. SF tests are available as automated assays and in kit form.(2) | View Page |
| Screening Controversies The subject of screening for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is controversial and is currently being debated in the medical literature. Using laboratory tests to screen the asymptomatic general population is currently not recommended due to issues of testing costs, low genetic penetrance, and the possible risk of discrimination. Targeted case finding in select high risk populations such as men of Northern European ancestry may be a better approach to screening. (12)Molecular-based (DNA) assays required for confirmation of HH are costly when used for general population screening. Because recent studies have shown that a high percentage of persons with C282Y mutations do not develop iron overload or HH-related clinical conditions, screening for these mutations may falsely label an individual with a disease diagnosis. At the present time, it is impossible to determine which homozygotes or heterozygotes for HFE mutations will eventually develop iron overload. Furthermore, there is potential risk of discrimination in obtaining health insurance for persons identified as having genetic disorders.In contrast, some experts do advocate for screening the general population. Mutations associated with HH are very common in Caucasians in the US. Individuals who know they carry mutations associated with HH may benefit from periodic testing for iron overload. Finally, laboratory tests that assess iron status are relatively inexpensive, widely available, and offer one approach to screening for phenotypic expression of HH. Screening first-degree family members of a person with documented HH is generally considered to be worthwhile. Early detection of HH in relatives with common mutations may permit treatment before the development of substantial iron overload and related disease due to organ damage. | View Page |
| What is one established reason supporting general population screening for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| Molecular Tests DNA tests for HFE mutations associated with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) are available in some clinical laboratories and reference laboratories. Testing for the presence of the C282Y is essential, although most labs also test for H63D and S65C mutations. Molecular testing is most appropriate for confirmatory testing of symptomatic individuals with altered iron studies (increased TS and SF), in pre-symptomatic individuals (increased TS, normal SF and liver function tests), and in family members of individuals diagnosed with HH. The use of genetic tests alone for routine screening of asymptomatic persons is not recommended for several reasons. A positive test indicating the presence of HFE mutations does not guarantee that an individual will develop clinically significant iron overload or predict severity of symptoms. A negative result (no HFE mutations present) does not rule out a diagnosis of iron overload because of genetic heterogeneity. Compared to biochemical analyses for iron, molecular assays are expensive. Finally, molecular testing may result in the diagnosis of a genetic disease, thus opening up the possibility for discrimination in health insurance coverage. Using molecular methods, DNA is extracted from leukocytes in whole blood samples or from buccal cells and analyzed for specific HFE mutations using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with melt curve analysis. Currently there are no FDA-cleared products for HFE testing, and testing laboratories are using "home brew" reagents. This situation is expected to change as manufacturers submit products for FDA approval. | View Page |
| Which of the following does NOT apply to the use of molecular assays in testing for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| Definitive Tests for Iron Overload Measuring the amount of iron deposited in the liver is considered definitive for iron overload. This may be done by liver biopsy, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Demonstrating iron in parenchymal liver cells helps determine disease severity. Liver sections obtained by biopsy are stained with Perls Prussian blue which stains iron present in parenchymal cells. A photomicrograph of this reaction is shown.Although liver biopsy may not be necessary for diagnosing hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), it offers the advantage of detecting liver fibrosis if present. Molecular tests for mutations associated with HH are considered the gold standard of current HH testing. Liver biopsy is not needed for diagnosing all patients suspected of having HH, but may be ordered in some cases. | View Page |
| Other Factors Affecting Drug Absorption and Distribution In addition to protein availability, other factors may affect drug absorption and distribution in the body as a whole or at specific sites within the body. The following table highlights some of these other factors. Factor Discussion Regional blood flow Reduced area blood flow can be seen in diabetics and enhanced blood flow can be seen in tumors. Lipid solubility of the drug The more lipophilic a drug is, the more likely it will enter the central nervous system. The integrity of the GI tract In a diseased gut, an orally-administered drug may not be absorbed as expected. Age Drug kinetics and dispositions change throughout life. In general, metabolism of drugs is reduced in the elderly. Genetics Mutations or deletions in drug metabolizing enzymes can greatly affect a drug's disposition. | View Page |
| Individualized Medicine It has been said that we live in a new era of "individualized medicine". One of the primary drivers for this idea is the emerging field of pharmacogenomics (PGx). Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is the study of how individual variations in the human genome affect responses to medications. The term "pharmacogenetics" is also used for this discipline (people in the field use both terms); however, the term 'pharmacogenomics' is becoming more popular since we now know the entire human genome. The primary reason that individuals metabolize and respond to drugs differently is the inter-individual differences in receptor proteins and enzymes that metabolize the drugs. Mutations in these receptor proteins and enzymes can give rise to very different responses to drugs. In PGx, these mutations are referred to as variants. | View Page |
| Enzyme Abnormalities and Drugs The following is a list of enzymes for which known mutations have been associated with clinical effects. Enzymes Substrates (Drugs) Acetylaldehyde dehydrogenase Alcohol Acetylcholinesterase Succinylcholine Alcohol dehydrogenase Alcohol Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase Fluorouracil CYP2C9 Warfarin, phenytoin, losartan CYP2C19 Diazepam, omeprazole (Prilosec) CYP2D6 Many antidepressants, opioids, antiarrhythmics Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase Aspirin, quinidine N-acetyltransferase Procainamide, isoniazid Thioprine methyltransferase 6-mercaptopurine UDP-glucuronosyl transferase Acetaminophen, tolbutamide, irinotecan | View Page |
| Clinical Utility The ultimate goal in measuring CYP450 function or identifying polymorphisms is to predict effective therapeutic doses and responses in patients.Polymorphisms are identified using molecular techniques (allele-specific PCR, restriction digests, sequencing, hybridization assays, bead-based systems, microarrays, pyrosequencing, et al).Although most clinical labs do not offer PGx testing, reference labs are beginning to market these tests. For example, one reference laboratory in the Midwest that offers CYP2D6 profiling measures about one dozen of the most common and significant mutation sites on this enzyme. This allows for detection of approximately 98% of the known CYP2D6 polymorphisms. The laboratory then generates a report which will advise the physician on the patient's drug-metabolizing status.Estimates show that 6-10% of the general population have a complete deficiency of CYP2D6, with the prevalence of mutations varying from <1% to as much as 21% within a given population. | View Page |
| CYP450 Induction and Inhibition Variables other than mutations also affect CYP450 enzymes. Many drugs are able to induce CYP450 enzymes, and CYP450s can be inhibited by a variety of substances. For example, CYP2D6 can be inhibited by the common medications cimetidine (Tagamet) and fluoxetine (Prozac). Since many patients are on multiple medications and since dietary and environmental factors can change, CYP450 expression levels cannot be solely predicted based on their genotype. Some CYP450 inducers and inhibitors are listed in the table on the following page. | View Page |
| Genotype versus Phenotype Genotyping can give us a definitive profile of a given CYP450 enzyme's mutations. But since there are dozens of mutations usually associated with each enzyme, a complete characterization of a CYP450 is not always realistic. Without complete sequencing of the entire allele, it may not be possible to entirely rule out a mutation in a patient who shows none of the more common polymorphisms. If we consider the number of possible mutations and the possible presence of inducing/inhibiting substances, phenotyping for drug metabolism may sound more reasonable than genotyping. | View Page |