| Review 2 Suppola JP. Kuikka A. Vaara M. Valtonen VV.
Comparison of risk factors and outcome in patients with Enterococcus faecalis vs Enterococcus faecium bacteremia.
Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 30(2):153-7, 1998.The purpose of our study was to determine retrospectively the risk factors for the acquisition of Enterococcus faecalis vs E. faecium bacteremia, as well as the clinical outcomes of these patients.62 patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia were compared to 31 patients with E. faecium bacteremia. Haematologic malignancies, neutropenia, high-risk source and previous use of aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins and clindamycin were significantly associated with E. faecium bacteremia. Instead, urinary catheterization was found to be related to Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia. The mortality rates within 7 d and 30 d were 13% and 27%, respectively, in patients with E. faecalis bacteremia and 6% and 29%, respectively, in patients with E. faecium bacteremia.There was no difference in mortality between E. faecalis and E. faecium bacteremia, nor was there a difference in seriousness of disease at the time of bacteremia. In the subgroups of patients with monomicrobial or clinically significant E. faecalis vs E. faecium bacteremia, the mortality rates were similar to the results of all subjects.Our results do not support the theory that E. faecium would be a more virulent organism than E. faecalis | View Page |
| Review 2 Citron DM. Appelbaum PC.:
How far should a clinical laboratory go in identifying anaerobic isolates, and who should pay?
Clinical Infectious Diseases. 16 Suppl 4:S435-8, 1993Identification of anaerobic bacteria in specimens from sites of infection due to mixed organisms can be time-consuming and expensive. Laboratories should limit anaerobic workups by testing only those specimens that have been properly collected and transported to the laboratory.Use of selective and differential media for initial processing can provide rapid and relevant information to the clinician. Anaerobes isolated from normally sterile sites and sites of serious infection should always be completely identified. Group-or genus-level identifications may suffice in other instances.The Bacteroides fragilis group of organisms should always be identified because of their virulence and resistance to many antimicrobial agents.Some of the other organisms that warrant identification include Clostridium septicum (associated with gastrointestinal malignancy); Clostridium ramosum, Clostridium innocuum, and Clostridium clostridioforme (which are resistant to antibiotics); Clostridium perfringens (a cause of myonecrosis and gas gangrene,potentially serious infection); anaerobic cocci (which may be resistant to metronidazole and clindamycin); and fusobacteria (which may be virulent and resistant to clindamycin and penicillin). | View Page |
| Review 2 Hershow RC. Khayr WF. Smith NL.:
A comparison of clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital (University of Illinois at Chicago).
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 13(10):587-93, 1992OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) infections in 1989.DESIGN: A retrospective comparison of host factors, in-hospital exposures, sites of infections, and outcomes of patients with nosocomial MRSA and MSSA infections. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four adult patients with nosocomial S.aureus infections.RESULTS: The 22 MRSA-infected and 22 MSSA-infected persons were similar regarding mean age, gender, underlying diseases, and exposure to surgery. Before developing infection, MRSA-infected persons were more likely to have received antibiotics and to have stayed in the hospital > 2 weeks. Bacteremia was the most common presentation in the MRSA and MSSA groups (55% and 59%, respectively). Infectious complications and death were infrequent in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: MRSA and MSSA strains infect patients with similar demographic features and underlying diseases, but MRSA infections are significantly more common among patients with previous antibiotic therapy and a prolonged preinfection hospital stay. Clinical presentations and outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Thus, similar to studies in the early 1980s, our findings do not suggest greater intrinsic virulence of MRSA. | View Page |
| Review 1 Piscitelli SC., Shwed J., Schreckenberger P., Danziger LH.
Streptococcus milleri group: renewed interest in an elusive pathogen.
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.11:491-8, 1992The following review examines the bacteriological characteristics, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antimicrobial susceptibility of the "Streptococcus milleri group". "Streptococcus milleri group" is a term for a large group of streptococci which includes Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus and Streptococcus anginosus.Usually considered commensals, these organisms are often associated with various pyogenic infections including cardiac, intra-abdominal, subcutaneous and central nervous system infections, particularly with the formation of abscesses.Organisms of the "Streptococcus milleri group" are often unrecognized pathogens due to the lack of uniformity in classifications and difficulties in microbiological identification. Penicillin G, cephalosporins, clindamycin and vancomycin all possess activity against these streptococci.Use of agents with poor activity may promote infections with "Streptococcus milleri group" and allow it to exhibit its pathogenicity. An understanding of these organisms may aid in their recognition and proper treatment. | View Page |
| Review 2 Gelfand MS. Bakhtian BJ. Simmons BP.:
Spinal sepsis due to Streptococcus milleri: two cases and review.
Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 13:559-63, 1991We have recently cared for two patients with spinal sepsis secondary to infection with Streptococcus milleri.One patient had a spinal epidural abscess and the other had meningitis as well as a spinal subdural empyema.A review of the English-language literature revealed only two previously reported cases of spinal epidural abscess due to S. milleri and no cases of spinal subdural empyema due to S. milleri. We report two cases of spinal sepsis due to S. milleri and discuss pertinent literature. | View Page |
| Review 1 Spencer RC.:
Invasive streptococcEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 14 Suppl. 1:S26-32, 1995.Before the introduction of antibiotics, serious infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (Lancefield Group A streptococci) were common. Before World War II, this bacterium was responsible for as many as 50% of postpartum deaths and was the major cause of death in patients with burns. Also common were the sequelae of streptococcal infections-rheumatic fever and post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis.With the use of penicillin, however, Streptococcus pyogenes was believed to be virtually eliminated as a pathogen. The organism was consigned to the history books, but not for long.In the mid-1980s, focal resurgences of rheumatic fever began to be reported from different areas in the USA, such as Salt Lake City, Utah. In such communities, where increases in cases of rheumatic fever had been reported, the serotypes M-1, 3, 5, 6 and 18 were isolated which, on culture, produced characteristic mucoid colonies. At the same time, reports of increases in invasive streptococcal disease began to surface in both the USA and Europe.Two syndromes were described; invasive streptococcal infection, occurring in previously healthy children and adults, commonly associated with septicaemia resulting from a deep focus of infection such as bone or lung; and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, involving a cutaneous focus, accompanied by necrotizing or bullous soft tissue changes. Septicaemia is rare in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, but the most characteristic feature is one of rapidly progressing multi-organ failure. A high proportion of the strains of Streptococcus pyogenes associated with this condition are serotype M-1, and fatality rates approaching 50% have been reported. | View Page |
| Review 3 Robinson LG. Kourtis AP.:
Tale of a toothpick: Eikenella corrodens osteomyelitis.
Infection. 28(5):332-3, 2000Tale of a Toothpick is a case of Eikenella corrodens osteomyelitis in a young woman, that resulted from puncture of her foot with a toothpick.The epidemiology, microbiology, common clinical presentations and therapy of E. corrodens are reviewed.A brief summary of the extent of toothpick injuries and their infectious complications are also presented. | View Page |
| Overview Molecular diagnostics have begun to play an integral part in clinical laboratory diagnostic testing. Traditionally, molecular diagnostics have been utilized in three major clinical areas: Infectious diseases Genetics Tumor markers These molecular based diagnostic tests, while historically reserved for specialty/reference labs, have recently seen expansion of their utility within the scope of routine clinical laboratories. Molecular based diagnostics can be utilized by small labs as well as large ones, and can be found in virtually every department of the clinical laboratory. | View Page |
| Overview To aid in the diagnosis of disease or identification of infectious agents, clinical laboratorians use a variety of methodologies to assist them. Knowing what to look for, or the right question to ask, is vital to obtaining the correct answer. Many diseases and agents have unique causes. The cause of the condition then becomes the "target" to be identified and perhaps even quantified. For example: If Patient A is suspected of having disease X, and disease X requires treatment, it is necessary to prove that disease X exists within patient A. We must know something about what causes disease X; is disease X an antigen, a bacteria, a viral particle, a missequenced piece of DNA?Once the target of interest (in this case Disease X) has been identified, the clinical laboratorian can choose the methodology most appropriate to answering the question, "Does disease X exist within Patient A?" | View Page |
| Advantages of Molecular Testing Molecular methodologies offer numerous advantages to the clinical laboratory. These include:Sensitivity: Amplification methodologies are particularly useful in increasing the sensitivity of a methodology and useful in the identification of target molecules of interest that are only present in low concentrations. Specificity: Molecular methods minimize false positive test results by targeting the specific molecule of interest.Turn Around Time: In comparison with standard traditional culture methods, molecular methodologies usually offer better turn around times from receipt to result reporting.Application: broader application can be found with molecular methodologies such as infectious diseases, genetic testing, forensics, drug resistance, and tumor marker detection and monitoring. | View Page |
| Infectious Diseases Molecular methodologies can be useful in the detection of a variety of diseases that are important public health issues such as:Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC)Human papillomavirus (HPV)Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)Cytomegalovirus (CMV)In many clinical laboratories, traditional methods have been replaced by molecular methodologies because testing can occur for several pathogens in a single specimen. This is termed multiplex testing. | View Page |
| When Nucleic Acids Get Altered The reason to chose a particular molecular method can be influenced by disease detection, monitoring or therapy in certain patient populations. Molecular methodologies can be used to identify alterations or variations or changes in DNA sequencing that can cause disease. Sequence alterations that are known to cause disease are termed mutations. These changes or mutations can be applied to areas of the clinical lab such as infectious disease, paternity, genetic testing, and pharmacogenetics. Some of the more common alterations are:Deletion: a missing nucleotide or other portion of DNA sequence Insertion: an extra DNA nucleotide or other portion of DNA sequence Missense: a nucleotide or sequence substitution that codes for a different amino acidNonsense: a nucleotide substitution that ends in early termination of the protein manufacturing process; usually due to a stop codon.The most common alteration is a single base change or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) | View Page |
| Which of the following are considered advantages of molecular testing? | View Page |
| References Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, eds. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Inc; 2006.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Collection, Transport, Preparation, and Storage of Specimens for Molecular Methods; Approved Guideline. CLSI document MM13-A. NCCLS. Wayne, PA: 2005.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Infectious Diseases; Approved Guideline. Second ed. CLSI document MM3-A2. NCCLS. Wayne, PA: 2006. | View Page |
| National Labs At the highest level are the “national” laboratories. Examples would include those operated by CDC, the United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, and the Naval Medical Research Center. These laboratories have very unique resources to handle highly infectious agents and the ability to identify specific agent strains. | View Page |
| In the LRN hierarchy, large organizations like the CDC, the United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, and the Naval Medical Research Center are classified as | View Page |
| What if: Biological Attack Biological attacks involve bacteria, viruses or natural toxins. The effects of toxins can be immediate but for bacteria and viruses the effects may not be apparent for weeks. A bio-terrorist may attack by infecting animals, contaminating food and water, spraying bacteria or viruses into the air. In infections such as smallpox and plague, once a few individuals are infected they can further spread the disease from person to person. An attack could also come from through a building’s ventilation system, the mail, or even through exposure to an infected terrorist seeking to spread disease during an infectious stage. | View Page |
| In Case of a Biological Attack Listen to the radio for instructions from authorities on whether to evacuate or stay put. If told to stay inside, seek shelter in an internal room or a room with as few doors and windows as possible. Turn off all ventilation and as best as possible seal all openings in windows and doors. Continue to monitor the radio. Some biological attacks may be more immediately apparent than others. Monitor your radio, television, or medical alert for instructions from authorities regarding disease symptoms and how and where to seek medical attention. If you do come in contact with a visible, potentially infectious substance, you should remove and bag your clothes and personal items, wash yourself with warm soapy water immediately, and seek medical assistance. | View Page |
| You Are At Risk! As a healthcare worker, you come into contact with materials that may contain bloodborne pathogens. These are infectious organisms, usually viruses, which live in human blood and body fluids.The most important ones are: Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) | View Page |
| About This Course This course will provide you with basic information about bloodborne pathogens, the regulations that govern safe work practices when handling blood and other potentially infectious body fluids, and necessary precautions that must be taken to minimize your risk of exposure to these infections. | View Page |
| Standard Precautions! Standard precautions mean that all blood and body fluids should be handled as if they were infectious and capable of transmitting disease. Standard Precautions apply to all: Blood Body fluids Secretions (except sweat) Excretions Non-intact skin Mucous membranes | View Page |
| How is HBV Spread? The virus is spread when body fluids from an individual with the Hepatitis B virus are introduced into the body of a susceptible person.This contact may occur during introduction of blood or potentially infectious body fluid: Through an opening or sore in the skin. Via a puncture with a contaminated sharp such as a needle. Through direct contact with mucous membranes that line the insides of the mouth, nose, eyes, and the genital organs. HBV is not spread through casual contact, such as handshake, or through sweat. | View Page |
| Who is infected? Patients with Hepatitis B and other bloodborne infections can appear healthy, so you can't tell whose blood is infectious.So treat all: blood body fluids secretions (except sweat) excretions non-intact skin mucous membranes as if they were infectious.That's what the term Standard Precautions means. | View Page |
| Body Fluids Most Likely To Transmit HBV Body fluids most likely to transmit HBV are: Blood Semen Vaginal Secretions Pleural Fluid Peritoneal Fluid Pericardial Fluid Cerebrospinal Fluid Synovial Fluid Amniotic Fluid Blood contaminated saliva in dental procedures Any fluid visibly contaminated with blood Sweat uncontaminated by blood is not considered infectious. | View Page |
| How long can HBV be spread? A person infected with HBV can spread the virus soon after the initial infecting incident, and the infectious period continues through the acute and chronic illness. | View Page |
| Blood Needed For Transmission The amount of blood needed to cause HBV infection is very small. One milliliter of blood contains up to 100 million infectious particles.30% of persons exposed to HBV by needle stick will get the infection. | View Page |
| Transmission of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) can occur from all of the following EXCEPT: | View Page |
| Handling Specimens Work practice controls affect the transport of blood and other potentially infectious materials.Proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including eye protection, gloves, and lab coats or aprons, must be used when handling specimens.Spilled specimens must be cleaned up using proper PPE . | View Page |
| Transporting Specimens Place blood and other infectious specimens ... first in an appropriate sealed container and then in a secondary red or biohazard labeled bag. Or place them in a compartmentalized tray for transport within the institution. | View Page |
| Gloves Must be Worn When there is a reasonable chance of exposure to blood, other infectious body fluids, mucous membranes, or nonintact skin. During vascular access procedures, including phlebotomy. When handling contaminated items or surfaces. | View Page |
| Exposure Incident Even after taking all the proper precautions there is still a small chance of an exposure incident. An Exposure incident occurs when: Blood or another potentially infectious body fluid comes into direct contact with mucous membranes or non-intact skin. Parenteral exposure means: Exposure occurring as a result of piercing the skin barrier through needlesticks, cuts, or abrasions. | View Page |
| Who Must Receive Training? According to federal and international regulations, all personnel who are involved in the packaging and shipping of infectious materials are required to have training in these procedures. This includes anyone who: Packages, labels, and/or marks the package Is responsible for classifying the materials Is responsible for documenting the package contents on a shipping declaration form, air waybill, etc. Transports hazardous materials by vehicle, plane, or vessel | View Page |
| What are the Training Requirements? The training requirements that are stated in the US Code of Federal Regulations at 49 CFR 172.704 must be met by all personnel who are involved in shipping hazardous materials in the United States and training must be completed within 90 days of employment or performance of the required hazmat function (relevant documented training from a previous employer is acceptable).These requirements include: General awareness/familiarization training Function-specific training Safety training Security awareness training (Category A substances) Safety training, must be provided by the facility where the infectious materials are packaged and must include: Emergency response information Measures to protect the employee from the hazards associated with hazardous materials to which they may be exposed in the work place, including specific measures the hazmat employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure Methods and procedures for avoiding accidents, such as the proper procedures for handling packages containing hazardous materials | View Page |
| What Records Must Be Maintained? Training records must include: Employee name Most recent date trained Description of training Description, copy, or location of training materials Name and address of trainerThese records must be maintained throughout employment and 90 days thereafter, according to the US Department of Transportation (DOT). IATA and some laboratory regulatory agencies, including the College of American Pathologists (CAP), require repeat of training every two years. DOT requires training every three years. You will be able to print a certificate when you have completed this course that will certify your completion of training for packaging and shipping Division 6.2 (infectious) materials. | View Page |
| Classifications of Hazardous Materials The US Department of Transportation (DOT) classifies hazardous materials according to the risks that they pose. There are nine hazard classes: Class 1: Explosives Class 2: Gases Class 3: Flammable liquids Class 4: Flammable solids Class 5: Oxidizers/organic peroxides Class 6: Toxic and infectious substances Class 7: Radioactive material Class 8: Corrosives Class 9: Miscellaneous hazardous materials Within class 6 are two divisions: Division 6.1- poisonous material Division 6.2- infectious substanceA division 6.2 infectious substance is defined as a material known or reasonably expected to contain a pathogen. A pathogen is a microorganism or other agent (e.g., a prion) that can cause disease in humans or animals. The regulations that govern packaging and shipping a class 9, miscellaneous hazardous material, may also need to be reviewed by those who package and ship laboratory specimens. Dry ice is a class 9 hazardous material and, if used, requires special packaging, and specific labeling and marking on the outer package. | View Page |
| Categories of Division 6.2 Infectious Substances Hazardous material classifications are consistent across all agencies who regulate commercial shipping and are based on criteria developed by the United Nations (UN) Committee of Experts working with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), medical professionals, microbiologists, transportation professionals, and packaging technical experts. These requirements can be found in the 13th and 14th editions of the United Nations Recommendations for the Transport of Dangerous Goods, the 2005 - 2006 edition of the International Civil Aviation Organization Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO Technical Instructions), and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Dangerous Goods Code. The classification system for Division 6.2 Infectious Substances includes two catergories, known simply as Category A and Category B. | View Page |
| Category A Definition and Examples A category A infectious substance is in a form that is capable of causing permanent disability or life-threatening or fatal disease in otherwise healthy humans or animals when exposure to it occurs. Exposure would occur if the substance were released from its protective packaging and a human or animal came into contact with it. Some examples of category A infectious substances include: Bacillus anthracis (cultures only) Brucella abortus (cultures only) Brucella melitensis (cultures only) Burkholderia mallei (cultures only) Clostridium botulinum (cultures only) Dengue virus (cultures only) Escherichia coli, verotoxigenic (cultures only) Ebola virus Francisella tularensis (cultures only) Hantaviruses causing hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome Herpes B virus (cultures only) Human immunodeficiency virus (cultures only) Lassa virus Mycobacterium tuberculosis (cultures only) Poliovirus (cultures only) Rabies and other lyssaviruses (culture only) Shigella dysenteriae type I (cultures only) West Nile virus (cultures only) Yersinia pestis (cultures only)This is not an exhaustive list. Sometimes, deciding on the classification of an infectious substance requires professional judgement and involves knowing the medical history or symptoms of the source patient or animal and/or knowing the local epidemiological conditions at the time the patient specimen or culture was obtained. If there is doubt as to whether or not a substance meets the criteria of category A, it must be treated as a category A substance for shipping. | View Page |
| Category B Definition, Shipping Name, and Identification Number A category B infectious substance is not in a form generally capable of causing permanent disability or life-threatening or fatal disease in otherwise healthy humans or animals when exposure to it occurs. The proper shipping name and Identification number is:Biological substance, Category B, UN 3373 | View Page |
| Category A Identification Numbers The proper shipping names and identification numbers for category A infectious substances are:Infectious substances, affecting animals, UN2900Infectious substances, affecting humans, UN2814 | View Page |
| Exempt Substances Laboratory specimens that are unlikely to cause disease and do not meet the criteria for category A or B substances are not subject to Division 6.2 regulations. Specimens for which the hazardous materials regulation (HMR) does not apply include human or animal samples (including, but not limited to, secreta, excreta, blood and its components, tissue and tissue fluids, and body parts) being transported for routine testing not related to the diagnosis of an infectious disease. This includes specimens that are being sent for: drug or alcohol testing cholesterol testing blood glucose level testing prostate specific antibody (PSA) testing testing to monitor kidney or liver function pregnancy testing tests for diagnosis of non-infectious diseases such as cancer biopsies | View Page |
| Definitions Before further discussion of Category A and Category B, it is important to define two additional terms that are used in the classification process. CultureAn infectious substance containing a pathogen that is intentionally propagated, for example a bacterium grown on bacteriological medium as seen in the image below. Culture does not include a human or animal patient specimen.Patient specimenHuman or animal materials collected directly from humans or animals and transported for research, diagnosis, investigational acitivities, or disease treatment or prevention. Patient specimen includes excreta, secreta, blood and its components, tissue and tissue swabs, body parts, and specimens in transport media (e.g., transwabs, culture media, and blood culture bottles).* *It is important to note that this means specimens that have been collected into these transport media, but have not yet been incubated and are not actively growing in the media. | View Page |
| Packaging for Category A Specimens Triple packaging is required for category A substances.The image on this page illustrates the correct packaging scheme. Packaging must include: A watertight primary receptacle A watertight secondary packaging Absorbent material in sufficient quantity to absorb the entire contents. (This is not required if the infectious substance is a solid.) The absorbent material is to be placed between the primary receptacle and the secondary packaging An itemized list of contents, enclosed between the secondary packaging and the outer packaging Rigid outer packaging | View Page |
| Additional Packaging Requirements for Category A and Category B Substances If multiple primary receptacles are placed in a single secondary packaging, they must be either individually wrapped or separated so as to prevent contact between them.The primary receptacle or the secondary packaging must be capable of withstanding, without leakage, an internal pressure producing a pressure differential of not less than 95 kPa (13.8 lbs/in2) because the package may be placed into an unpressurized storage compartment in a cargo aircraft. This must be verified when choosing packaging for shipping either category A or category B substances by aircraft. It is also recommended if shipping by ground. An evacuated blood collection tube that has remained unopened qualifies as a 95 kPa container. The smallest surface of the outer packaging must be at least 100 mm X 100mm (3.9 inches).Other dangerous goods must not be packed in the same packaging as Division 6.2 infectious substances unless they are necessary for preservation of the specimen (e.g., formalin). A quantity of 30 mL or less of formalin or other dangerous goods included in hazard Classes 3, 8, or 9 (flammable liquids such as alcohol; corrosives such as acids or bases; or miscellaneous hazardous materials) may be packed in each primary receptacle containing infectious substances. A quantity greater than 30 mL will require appropriate hazard labels on the package. | View Page |
| Labeling a Package Containing a Category A Substance Packages that contain category A substances must exhibit these labels.Proper shipping name and UN number(Category A label) or Hazard class 6 infectious substance label that includes this statement:In case of damage or leakage, immediately notify public health authority. In the US, notify the CDC 1-800-232-0124 UN package certification markOrientation arrows (if greater than 50 mL)Contact information (Shipper or Consignee Identification)The contact person (usually the shipper), referred to as the "responsible person" by IATA, must be someone who can be reached 24 hours a day, seven days a week (24/7) and can answer questions about the content of the package. The 24/7 number must reach that person directly and not a pager or answering machine/service. If the contact person that you are listing is the person receiving the specimen, be certain that the person is aware you are listing him/her as the contact person and has consented to it. | View Page |
| Shipper's Declaration For Dangerous Goods - Third Section It is very important to include all the required information in this section. This includes: The UN number The proper shipping name Hazard class or division. For infectious substances, this will be 6.2; for dry ice this will be 9 as demonstrated below. Quantity and type of packaging Packing Instruction. For infectious substances, this will be 602; for dry ice, this will be 904. | View Page |
| Security Awareness A category A infectious substance is in a form that is capable of causing permanent disability or life-threatening or fatal disease in otherwise healthy humans or animals when exposure to it occurs. Exposure would occur if the substance were released from its protective packaging and a human or animal came into contact with it. Therefore, it is critical that a category A infectious substance does not end up in the hands of an unauthorized individual who may purposely or unknowingly release the substance from its protective packaging and endanger humans or animals. Being aware of the people that you interact with in the process of packaging and sending category A substances is vital to the safety of the transport and prevention of a health disaster. An outsider with limited access and system knowledge could constitute a threat, but be aware that insiders could also be a threat, e.g., a disgruntled employee or a person who is angry with his or her supervisor or job or the government. Anyone desiring to do harm could potentially seize the opportunity to steal a hazardous material.Follow these precautionary procedures: When you are questioned about an infectious substance that you are packaging for shipment, it is important that you know the person that is asking AND that he or she has a need to know. If you do not know the person and if you are not aware that the person needs to know about the substance that is being shipped, do not answer the questions. You could refer him or her to your supervisor. Watch for unusual behavior. Secure the package until it is picked up. Check the identification of the courier who will be picking up the package. Use an intralaboratory chain of custody procedure if the specimens are tranferred within the facility or system. Track the package once it has been sent to be sure it arrives safely. Notify the Responsible Official or federal authority if the package does not arrive at its destination. | View Page |
| Security Plan for Category A Infectious Substances Each facility that stores and transports hazardous materials must have a written, detailed security plan. The Select Agents and Toxins Security Information Document that was prepared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is an excellent resource to use for developing a security plan that would apply to category A infectious substances. This document can be found at http://www.selectagents.gov/resources%5CSecurity%20Information%20Document.pdfThe current version, dated March 8, 2007, is available in this course as a resource. However, because the document does undergo revisions, it is recommended that the URL given above be checked periodically for document updates. | View Page |
| References International Civil Aviation Organization. Technical instructions for the safe transport of dangerous goods by air. Doc 9284; 2005 - 2006 ed with amendment. National Laboratory Training Network. Packaging and shipping Division 6.2 materials. Georgia Public Health Laboratory; 2008. Sentinel Laboratory Guidelines for Suspected Agents of Bioterrorism. Available at: http://www.asm.org/ASM/files/LeftMarginHeaderList/DOWNLOADFILENAME/000000001202/Packing&Shipping11-18-05.pdf Accessed on February 13, 2009.US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Transporting Infectious Substances Safely. Guide to changes effective October 1, 2006. Washington, DC; 2006. | View Page |
| How tuberculosis is spread The Mycobacterium tuberculosis organism is spread through infectious droplet nuclei.When a person infected with pulmonary tuberculosis coughs, sneezes, shouts, or sings, the infectious particles are expelled into the air.The risk of infection is related to both concentration of infectious droplet nuclei and duration of exposure. | View Page |
| Three levels of TB Infection Control Administrative controls reduce the risk of exposure to persons who might have TB disease.Environmental controls prevent the spread and reduce the concentration of infectious droplet nuclei in ambient air.Respiratory protection controls are for situations that pose a high risk of exposure to further reduce risk of exposure of HCWs to infectious droplet nuclei that have been expelled into the air from a patient with infectious TB disease. | View Page |
| Which of the following secondary barriers are recommended for microbiology laboratories that work with Biosafety level 3 agents (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis)? | View Page |
| Biosafety Levels Laboratory workers who handle infectious materials in the microbiology laboratory should be aware of the work practices, safety equipment, and barriers that will protect them and others in the area from infectious agents. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) created guidelines to assist laboratories in developing safe practices based on the infectious agents that are handled. These guidelines are referred to as Biosafety Levels 1 through 4. Each increasing number represents increased risk, requiring more stringent work practice and increasingly protective safety equipment and barriers. A copy of the Guidelines can be obtained from the CDC or accessed online at:http://www.cdc.gov/OD/ohs/biosfty/bmbl5/bmbl5toc.htm | View Page |
| Biosafety Level 3 Biosafety level (BSL) 3 practices, safety equipment, and facility design and construction are applicable to microbiology laboratories that work with indigenous or exotic agents with a potential for respiratory transmission, and which may cause serious and potentially lethal infection. If the laboratory is propagating and manipulating cultures for M. tuberculosis, BSL 3 practices, containment equipment, and facilities are required. Nonaerosol-producing manipulations can be performed using BSL 2 practices, containment equipment, and facilities. At biosafety level 3, laboratory manipulations should be performed in a Class l or Class ll biosafety cabinet (BSC) or other physical containment device. Secondary barriers include controlled access to the laboratory and ventilation requirements that minimize the release of infectious aerosols from the laboratory. Secondary barriers should include self-closing double-door access and negative airflow into the laboratory. Exhausted air must not be recirculated. | View Page |
| Match the letter representing the cell type with the condition in which increased numbers of the cell may be found in the peripheral smear. | View Page |
| An increase in peripheral blood monocytes with an appearance similar to the cell in the photograph is highly suggestive of infectious mononucleosis. | View Page |
| The upper image of a peripheral blood smear reveals RBC Rouleaux formation. Several blood cells that are similar in appearance to the one indicated by the arrow in the bottom image are also seen on the smear. Which of the following conditions is associated with both of these findings? | View Page |
| A peripheral blood smear illustrated by this photograph is highly suggestive of metastatic carcinoma. | View Page |
| Additional comments on this exercise The following pages in this presentation includes a series of white blood cell abnormalities that may be identified in a peripheral blood smear. Many of the cases will simulate the practice of a peripheral smear review by a hematology morphologist. He/she must asses what responses in patient care may be triggered by the clinician attempting to interpret the reported findings on a peripheral smearObservations of white blood cell abnormalities in the peripheral blood smear should be reported so as to direct the physician to an immediate specific diagnosis, such as: (1) atypical lymphocytes suggesting infectious mononucleosis rather than leukemia, (2) toxic granules in neutrophils as in acute infections, or atypical granules suggesting a genetic disorder, (3) an unusual mix of cells, such as too many or too few neutrophils, monocytes, or other myeloid cells, and (4) the presence of giant platelets, myelocytes, or other cells suggesting a myelodysplastic syndrome.In summary, laboratory data should be presented to clinicians in a user friendly way to promote effective decision making. The design of the data base of information must be directed toward providing clinically helpful information clearly and quickly in order to facilitate appropriate action in terms of optimizing patient care outcomes.d | View Page |
| The association of increased platelets accompanying neutrophilia and toxic granululation as illustrated in this photograph is called thrombocytopenia. | View Page |
| WBC inclusions: summary The presence of atypical inclusions within the cytoplasm of neutrophils and other leukocytes should lead to a clinical investigation of the setting for these findings.Atypical neutrophil inclusions may be seen in the following disorders: Chediak-Higashi syndrome, May-Hegglin anomaly, Alder-Reilly anomaly, Fechtner , Sebastian, Epstein and Alport-like syndromes and in infectious and toxic conditions (in the form of Doehle bodies).Although a specific entity may not be evident from examination of the peripheral blood alone, it is important that hematology technologists include a comment reporting on the presence of these inclusions or granules. A clinical investigation with further hematologic and genetic studies may then appropriately be considered.Many of the disorders with atypical neutrophil cytoplasmic granules are also associated with platelet abnormalities, particularly giant platelets (lower photograph).Therefore, when atypical granules are recognized, scanning of the peripheral blood smear for atypical platelets may be revealing. These observations serve as readily identifiable markers for acquired and genetic human maladies, and as a guide for unraveling the reasons for a patient's suffering and impaired health. | View Page |
| A peripheral smear was submitted for morphology/clinical because of the number of monocytes as captured in the upper and lower photographs. This picture is consistent with each of the following conditions except: | View Page |
| Case history A 14 year-old boy came to the physician's office with a sore throat that progressively worsened over a three day period. His posterior pharynx was swollen ,shiney and erythematous. The boy complained of pain on swallowing. His temperature was 98.5F. A rapid direct streptococcal antigen test was positive. However, his symptoms did not subside over the next two days while on antibiotic therapy. Anorexia and nausea were persistent and compounded by a frontal headache. Cervical lymph nodes became noticeably enlarged. The results of the CBC were: WBC 11.9/mm3 with 17% segmented neutrophils, 5% bands, 72%(60% atypical--see photograph)lymphocytes and 6%monocytes. All red cell findings were normal. A monospot test was positive. This is a case of group-A streptococcal infection superimposed on infectious mononucleosis. Symptoms subsided in 3 weeks following completion of the antibiotic therapy. | View Page |
| The large blue staining cells represented here in the photographs comprise 50% of the total white blood count.This picture is most consistent with: | View Page |