Infection control Information and Courses from MediaLab, Inc.
These are the MediaLab courses that cover Infection control and links to relevant pages within the course.
Learn more about laboratory continuing education for medical technologists to earn CE credit for AMT, ASCP, NCA, and state license renewal and recertification. Or get information about laboratory safety and compliance courses that deliver cost-effective OSHA safety training and continuing education to your laboratory's employees.
| Review 1 Podschun R. Ullmann U.: Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 11(4):589-603, 1998 Bacteria belonging to the genus Klebsiella frequently cause human nosocomial infections. In particular, the medically most important Klebsiella species, Klebsiella pneumoniae, accounts for a significant proportion of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections, pneumonia, septicemias, and soft tissue infections. The principal pathogenic reservoirs for transmission of Klebsiella are the gastrointestinal tract and the hands of hospital personnel. Because of their ability to spread rapidly in the hospital environment, these bacteria tend to cause nosocomial outbreaks. Hospital outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella species, especially those in neonatal wards, are often caused by new types of strains, the so-called extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers The incidence of ESBL-producing strains among clinical Klebsiella isolates has been steadily increasing over the past years. The resulting limitations on the therapeutic options demand new measures for the management of Klebsiella hospital infections. While the different typing methods are useful epidemiological tools for infection control, recent findings about Klebsiella virulence factors have provided new insights into the pathogenic strategies of these bacteria. Klebsiella pathogenicity factors such as capsules or lipopolysaccharides are presently considered to be promising candidates for vaccination efforts that may serve as immunological infection control measures. | View Page |
| Review 1 Garbutt JM. Littenberg B. Evanoff BA. Sahm D. Mundy LM. Enteric carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in patients tested for Clostridium difficile. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 20(10):664-70, 1999 OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for enteric carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) in hospitalized patients tested for Clostridium difficile toxin. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 215 adult inpatients who had stool tested for C. difficile between January 29 and February 25, 1996. RESULTS: 41 (19%) of 215 patients had enteric carriage of VREF. Five independent risk factors for enteric VREF were identified: (1) history of prior C. difficile infection, (2) parenteral treatment with vancomycin for > or = 5 days, (3) treatment with antimicrobials effective against gram-negative organisms, (4) admission from another institution, and (5) age > 60 years. These risk factors for enteric VREF were independent of the patient's current C. difficile status. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial exposures are the most important modifiable independent risk factors for enteric carriage of VREF in hospitalized patients tested for C. difficile. | View Page |
| Review 1 Francois P. Vaudaux P. Foster TJ. Lew DP.: Host-bacteria interactions in foreign body infections. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 17:514-20, 1996 Persistent staphylococcal infections are a major medical problem, especially when they occur on implanted materials or intravascular catheters. This review describes some of the recently discovered molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus attachment to host proteins coating biomedical implants. These interactions involve specific surface proteins, called bacterial adhesins, that recognize specific domains of host proteins deposited on indwelling devices, such as fibronectin, fibrinogen, or fibrin. Elucidation of molecular mechanisms of S. aureus adhesion to the different host proteins may lead to the development of specific inhibitors blocking attachment of S. aureus, which may decrease the risk of bacterial colonization of indwelling devices. | View Page |
| Review 2 Hershow RC. Khayr WF. Smith NL.: A comparison of clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital (University of Illinois at Chicago). Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 13(10):587-93, 1992 OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) infections in 1989. DESIGN: A retrospective comparison of host factors, in-hospital exposures, sites of infections, and outcomes of patients with nosocomial MRSA and MSSA infections. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four adult patients with nosocomial S.aureus infections. RESULTS: The 22 MRSA-infected and 22 MSSA-infected persons were similar regarding mean age, gender, underlying diseases, and exposure to surgery. Before developing infection, MRSA-infected persons were more likely to have received antibiotics and to have stayed in the hospital > 2 weeks. Bacteremia was the most common presentation in the MRSA and MSSA groups (55% and 59%, respectively). Infectious complications and death were infrequent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA and MSSA strains infect patients with similar demographic features and underlying diseases, but MRSA infections are significantly more common among patients with previous antibiotic therapy and a prolonged preinfection hospital stay. Clinical presentations and outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Thus, similar to studies in the early 1980s, our findings do not suggest greater intrinsic virulence of MRSA. | View Page |
| Handwashing Handwashing is the single most important method of infection control and prevention available.Take care to wash your hands: As soon as gloves are removed. Before and after direct patient contact. After toileting . Before and after meals. Anytime hands are visibly soiled. After contact with face or mouth. | View Page |
| Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Mycobacterium Human papilloma virus (HPV) is estimated to be the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Digene's hybrid capture assay for HPV received approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2003. Only in recent years have other manufacturers, such as Third Wave Technologies, added this virus to their testing capabilities.Mycobacterium species represented another desirable target for molecular testing. Although some improvements in cultivation and staining techniques had been realized through the incorporation of broth media and fluorochrome staining, identification is still hampered by the growth rate of the organism. Gen-Probe first marketed probes that would allow identification of tuberculosis, M. avium-intracellulare, and M. gordonae in culture positive specimens. These probes greatly streamlined the workup of culture positive specimens.Of great interest to both clinicians and infection control practitioners, is the direct detection of Mycobacterium in clinical specimens. Gen-Probe received FDA approval for its AMPLIFIED MTDâ product for this specific application (in smear positive specimens) in 1995. This method employs isothermal transcription mediated amplification; the amplicons are detected using the same hybridization as the culture confirmation tests. | View Page |
| Challenges for Implementation: Cost Implementing molecular methods may involve purchasing an equipment platform that represents a significant capital investment. Reagents for the assays are frequently more expensive, on a cost per test basis, than either culture or antigen detection methods. Reimbursement issues, although improving, can be more complex. Realistically, implementations of molecular methods are likely to represent increased costs that do need to be weighed against the potential benefits that can be realized.When considering the implementation of a molecular method, the following question should be asked:Will the methods significantly impact/improve clinical management and patient outcomes, reduce antimicrobial costs and lengths of stay, and/or facilitate infection control, epidemiology, or antibiotic stewardship programs?The answer may not be "yes" for every single agent of infectious disease for which molecular methods are now available. | View Page |
| Detection and Identification of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) MRSA presents both clinical and infection control challenges. Because of the increasing incidence of MRSA strains, empiric treatment for serious staph infections is usually vancomycin in the hospital setting. Although PNA-FISH can identify Staphyloccocus aureus more rapidly, it cannot yet differentiate MRSA from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains. Early differentiation of MRSA from non-MRSA strains could allow for adjustment from broad spectrum antimicrobial therapy, and reduced risk of development of resistance. Hospital acquired infections have garnered increasing attention from many quarters; MRSA is one of several drug resistant organisms that are of concern. Many institutions have implemented active surveillance culture (ASC) protocols to identify carriers of MRSA, both upon admission, and throughout the hospital stay. Identified carriers are placed under precaution protocols, to minimize risk of transmission to other patients during the hospital stay. MRSA status is also an important consideration for those patients who are being discharged to another facility (long term care or rehabilitation centers). Identifying carriers sooner rather than later can reduce the risk of transmission by earlier implementation of precaution protocols and reduce delays in discharge (and length of hospital stay) in situations where carrier status is needed prior to discharge. PCR methodologies offer the prospect of providing screening results 24 to 40 hours sooner than culture methodologies, depending on the culture medium employed. | View Page |
| Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci Many species in the genus Enterococcus possess intrinsic resistance to commonly used antibiotics. Intrinsic resistance represents naturally encoded chromosomal characteristics that are present in most Enterococci. These resistance mechanisms affect primarily the aminoglycosides and beta lactam antibiotics, and create therapeutic challenges for the treatment of serious infections such as endocarditis or septicemia. In addition to intrinsic resistance, Enterococci can acquire genetic determinants that confer resistance to other antibiotics. The emergence and increasing frequency of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) has presented both therapeutic and infection control challenges. | View Page |
| Risk Factors Medical conditions that lead to immunosuppression increase the risk of MRSA infection. Participating in contact sports, sharing towels or other personal items, living in areas with unsanitary conditions or living in crowded conditions, such as in dormitories or military barracks may also increase the risk of becoming infected with MRSA. Healthcare workers, the very young and the elderly are at increased risk of infection. Skin punctures and/or wounds increase infection risk by providing an entry point for the organism. Hospitalized patients are at risk of infection from healthcare workers with contaminated hands and from other MRSA carriers. Intravenous (IV) lines, surgical sites and implanted device can be easily contaminated with MRSA if infection control precautions are not followed. | View Page |
| Moving forward, important strategies for dealing with MRSA strains will include the following: | View Page |
| Disinfection & Control of C. difficile Infection C. difficile spores resist dessication for months and are known to persist on hard surfaces for up to 5 months. Spores persist even after exposure to air. Epidemic strain B1/NAP1/027 is known to hyper-sporulate, a virulence-associated characteristic of outbreak strains. Healthcare workers are an important vector for transmission as they may carry the spores on their hands or clothing. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers are very effective against non-sporulating organisms but do not kill C. difficile spores or remove the organism from the hands. The CDC recommends thorough hand washing using soap and water for care givers and family members alike.Patients with C. difficile infection (CDI) should be isolated to a single room with a bathroom or cohorted (roomed) together. Staff treating infected patients should use PPE (gowns & gloves) and wash hands after removing gloves. The use of gowns helps to prevent contamination of clothing. Surfaces should be decontaminated using a solution of 10% sodium hypochlorite (bleach), this is effective in reducing environmental contamination in hospital rooms. The CDC recommends the use of bleach for cleaning patient and staff rooms during outbreaks. Control strategies involving reinforcement of Infection control practices rather than drug restriction are more effective. These practices include: Proper education of staff members involved in care of CDI patients Better isolation compliance Use of gloves Frequent and thorough hand washing Environmental decontamination | View Page |
| Risk Factors and Resistance Enterococci are largely commensal organisms that are opportunistic pathogens. Underlying disease, an immunocompromised state, age, lengthy hospital stays or long term care, invasive treatments, and/or prior antimicrobial therapy are factors that are associated with significant infections with these species. As noted previously, Enterococci are intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics. Intrinsic resistance affects not only beta lactams (including a broad range of cepahlosporins) and aminoglycosides, but also clindamycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The standard recommended therapy for systemic infections is a combination of either penicillin or vancomycin and an aminoglycoside (gentamicin or streptomycin). The goal of combination therapy is to achieve a synergistic bacteriocidal effect between the cell wall agent and the aminoglycoside.In recent decades, increasing resistance to other antibiotics through acquired resistance mechanisms has become a growing therapeutic and infection control problem. Of key concern are high level resistance (HLR) to aminoglycosides and increasing resistance to glycopeptides such as vancomycin. | View Page |
| Enterococci can possess both intrinsic and acquired resistance. Which of the following represents the intrinsic resistance of a typical Enterococcal strain? | View Page |
| Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci Phenotypes In regards to glycopeptide resistance, there are six phenotypes, three of which are more commonly occurring. The VanA phenotype has an inducible high level resistance to vancomycin as well as teicoplanin (encoded by the VanA gene). The VanB phenotype (encoded by two vanB genes) has moderate to high resistance to vancomycin only. The VanC phenotype (encoded by two vanC genes) demonstrates a non-inducible low level resistance to vancomycin. Van A and Van B are the most clinically significant phenotypes and are usually seen among Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolates. Van C is both intrinsic and characteristic in E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. Because they are intrinsic rather than acquired, they represent a different impact/significance for hospital epidemiology; definitive speciation can have significance for infection control purposes.At the present time, both ampicillin and vancomycin resistance occur more frequently with E. faecium isolates than with E. faecalis. Most vancomycin resistant E. faecium strains possess the vanA gene. | View Page |
| Screening Cultures for Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci Many hospitals have chosen to implement screening programs to identify patients who are colonized with vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE). Screening patients provides information about potential source of illness and allows staff to implement appropriate infection control measures. These measures decrease transimission and reduce the number of patients who become infected with VRE.Peri-rectal or anal swabs, as well as stool specimens, are inoculated onto selective media. One medium utilized is bile esculin azide agar containing 6µg/ml of vancomycin. Black colonies that grow on this medium are identified as enterococcus to the species level and further confirmed as vancomycin-resistant by an appropriate susceptibility testing method.Chromogenic agars specific for VRE are also commercially available. | View Page |
| Your laboratory's primary susceptibility testing method is disk diffusion. The cefoxitin disc has a zone size of 19 mm and the vancomycin disc has a zone size of 7 mm. Appropriate courses of action include: | View Page |
| Selection of Drugs for Testing The panel of drugs selected for testing must take into consideration a number of factors: The laboratory performing the testing The number of drugs that can practically be tested Infection control requirements Drugs that are available in formularies Susceptibility patterns exhibited locally Consideration of the body site of the infection and whether the drug is an appropriate therapy | View Page |
| Importance of Handwashing Handwashing is the single most important method of infection control and prevention available.It prevents many other community and hospital acquired infections.It is essential in the prevention of bloodborne pathogen transmission. | View Page |
| Standard precautions Standard Precautions means treating all body fluids and substances as if they were infectious.
Since you can't tell which specimen may carry a bloodborne pathogen, use appropriate infection control measures during all patient contacts & when handling all specimens.
| View Page |
| Hand washing Hand washing is the single most important infection control measure.
Wash hands thoroughly before, after, and between all patient contacts.
Be sure to turn off faucets using a paper towel to avoid contamination.
| View Page |
| Guidelines for Diagnostic Testing and Treatment According to the CDC guidelines, patients with clinical illness consistent with uncomplicated influenza who reside in an area where influenza viruses are circulating may not require diagnostic influenza testing for clinical management. Most mild cases of H1N1 infection are self-limiting and do not require confirmation. However, if a patient is hospitalized due to the severity of the symptoms, or if the diagnosis of the patient will provide needed information to the physician to direct clinical care, infection control decisions, or management of close contacts, diagnostic influenza testing should be done. In any case, if a decision to use antiviral treatment is made, the treatment should commence as soon as possible, without waiting for the results of confirmatory diagnostic tests. | View Page |
| Contact Precautions for Laboratorians •Public health guidelines recommend that manipulation of samples for influenza testing be done inside a safety cabinet.If an employee has close contact with a patient with known or probable Influenza A 2009 H1N1 illness, an N95 respirator, as shown in the image below, should be worn, according to CDC guidelines. Note that if an N95 respirator is used, it must first be fit tested to ensure a complete seal around the mouth and nose.Laboratorians should always observe basic infection control procedures including equipment/counter top decontamination and Standard Precautions that include the use of engineering controls such as safety cabinets; personal protective equipment (PPE), such as gloves, fluid-resistant outer clothing, and respiratory protection; and work practice controls, such as frequent hand washing. | View Page |
| Infection Control To control the spread of infection, any of these events must occur: Person-to-person transmission is prevented.Host response is effectively stimulated to prevent, control, or eliminate infection.Antimicrobial treatment is effective against M. tuberculosis.Therefore, an effective TB infection control program must include: Prompt detectionAirborne precautionsTreatment | View Page |
| Fundamentals of TB Infection Control In 2005, a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated that "one of the most critical risks for health care-associated transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health care settings is from patients with unrecognized TB disease who are not promptly handled with appropriate airborne precautions or who are moved from an AII [airborne infection isolation] room too soon."*These fundamentals of infection control have proven to substantially reduce health care-associated transmission of TB, including multi-drug resistant TB:Use of standardized anti-tuberculosis treatment regimens in the initial phase of therapyRapid drug susceptibility testingDirectly observed therapy in which a health professional watches a patient swallow each dose of medication and records the date that the administration was observedImproved infection control practices *Reference: Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care settings, 2005. The CDC website. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5417.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2012. | View Page |
| Three Levels of TB Infection Control Administrative controls reduce the risk of exposure to persons who might have TB disease.Environmental controls prevent the spread and reduce the concentration of infectious droplet nuclei in ambient air.Respiratory protection controls are for situations that pose a high risk of exposure. These controls further reduce risk of occupational exposure to infectious droplet nuclei. | View Page |
| TB Infection Control in the Laboratory The laboratory director is responsible for the development of a risk-based infection control plan for the laboratory.The personnel are trained in methods that minimize the production of aerosols.The personal protective equipment that is specified in the infection control plan is used consistently. A respirator is used when performing procedures that can result in aerosolization outside a biological safety cabinet.Disposable gloves are worn for all laboratory procedures. | View Page |
| Protect Yourself Health care workers must be alert for signs and symptoms of TB to protect themselves from inadvertent exposure.Help protect yourself, coworkers, patients, and visitors by: Having current TB screening according to the risk classification of your setting Understanding the risks of TB in your work area Practicing good infection control at work and at home | View Page |