Hospital Information and Courses from MediaLab, Inc.

The cerebrospinal fluid sample should be properly labeled with the tube number, patient's name and hospital number. The samples should be transported to the laboratory immediately.

Podschun R. Ullmann U.: Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 11(4):589-603, 1998Bacteria belonging to the genus Klebsiella frequently cause human nosocomial infections. In particular, the medically most important Klebsiella species, Klebsiella pneumoniae, accounts for a significant proportion of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections, pneumonia, septicemias, and soft tissue infections.The principal pathogenic reservoirs for transmission of Klebsiella are the gastrointestinal tract and the hands of hospital personnel. Because of their ability to spread rapidly in the hospital environment, these bacteria tend to cause nosocomial outbreaks. Hospital outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella spp., especially those in neonatal wards, are often caused by new types of strains, the so-called extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) producersThe incidence of ESBL-producing strains among clinical Klebsiella isolates has been steadily increasing over the past years. The resulting limitations on the therapeutic options demand new measures for the management of Klebsiella hospital infections.While the different typing methods are useful epidemiological tools for infection control, recent findings about Klebsiella virulence factors have provided new insights into the pathogenic strategies of these bacteria. Klebsiella pathogenicity factors such as capsules or lipopolysaccharides are presently considered to be promising candidates for vaccination efforts that may serve as immunological infection control measures.

Garbutt JM. Littenberg B. Evanoff BA. Sahm D. Mundy LM. Enteric carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in patients tested for Clostridium difficile. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 20(10):664-70, 1999OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for enteric carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) in hospitalized patients tested for Clostridium difficile toxin.PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 215 adult inpatients who had stool tested for C. difficile between January 29 and February 25, 1996.RESULTS: 41 (19%) of 215 patients had enteric carriage of VREF. Five independent risk factors for enteric VREF were identified: (1) history of prior C. difficile infection, (2) parenteral treatment with vancomycin for > or = 5 days, (3) treatment with antimicrobials effective against gram-negative organisms, (4) admission from another institution, and (5) age > 60 years. These risk factors for enteric VREF were independent of the patient's current C. difficile status.CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial exposures are the most important modifiable independent risk factors for enteric carriage of VREF in hospitalized patients tested for C. difficile.

Francois P. Vaudaux P. Foster TJ. Lew DP.: Host-bacteria interactions in foreign body infections. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 17:514-20, 1996Persistent staphylococcal infections are a major medical problem, especially when they occur on implanted materials or intravascular catheters.This review describes some of the recently discovered molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus attachment to host proteins coating biomedical implants.These interactions involve specific surface proteins, called bacterial adhesins, that recognize specific domains of host proteins deposited on indwelling devices, such as fibronectin, fibrinogen, or fibrin.Elucidation of molecular mechanisms of S. aureus adhesion to the different host proteins may lead to the development of specific inhibitors blocking attachment of S. aureus, which may decrease the risk of bacterial colonization of indwelling devices.

The Non-Federally Regulated Custody and Control Form is most often used in clinics and hospital emergency rooms when drug abuse is suspected, or by companies participating in their state's drug-free workplace program. Be aware that some states mandate the use of a special CCF for their drug-free workplace program. There are significant differences between the Federally Regulated CCF and the Non-Regulated CCF. You are strongly encouraged to review the difference between the two. Unless there are extenuating (which we will discuss next), remember that the two forms are not interchangeable. The Federally Regulated CCF can be used only for urine collections required by the Department of Transportation drug testing program.

Here are the criteria for the preparation of tables, as specified by the Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science: Write table titles at the top of the table. Number tables sequentially with Roman numerals. Include the following information in a title, whenever possible: who, what, where, why and when. Put the independent variable in the left column, and the dependent variable in the right, if you are listing data with independent and dependent variables. Label each column with the appropriate units. Adequately space tables that appear on the same page. Example:Table I Patient specimens analyzed for blood urea nitrogen on the Dimension RxL and the Vitros 250 at City Hospital Sample # RxL (mg/dL urea) Vitros 250 (mg/dl) urea 1 8.8 8.8 2 11.2 10.0 3 12.4 13.6 4 16.2 13.2 5 20.0 21.2 6 25.0 20.0 7 28.8 26.2 In this case, the Dimension RxL is the "reference method" and is considered the independent variable, while the Vitros 250 is the "test method" and is considered the dependent variable.

Relative frequency is the proportion of a sample that belongs to a particular class. We calculate the relative frequency by dividing the class frequency by the total number of data points, n. The sum of the relative frequencies should be one, but due to rounding errors, sometimes it is not exactly one.Table IV Actual and Relative Frequency of Serum Glucose Levels in 130 Hospital Employees Intervals (mg/dL) Tally Frequency Relative Frequency 65 - 70 \\ 2 0.015 70 - 75 \\\\ \\ 7 0.054 75 - 80 \\\\ \\\\ \ 16 0.123 80 - 85 \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \ 31 0.238 85 - 90 \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ 24 0.185 90 - 95 \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\ 18 0.138 95 - 100 \\\\ \\\\ \\\ 13 0.100 100 - 105 \\\\ \\\\ 10 0.077 105 - 110 \\\\ 5 0.038 110 - 115 \\\\ 4 0.031 Total n = 130 0.999

Histograms are used for continuous or discrete data. When continuous data are charted, you can connect the midpoints of the tops of the bars with a dashed line.Figure 4Frequency of Serum Glucose Levels in 130 Hospital Employees

You also have the choice of plotting the relative or the absolute frequency along the y-axis. The relative frequency is better for large samples. The shape of the graphs, however, is the same for both methods. Figure 6 Absolute Frequency of Serum Glucose Levels in 130 Hospital Employees Figure 7 Relative Frequency of Serum Glucose Levels in 130 Hospital Employees

The LRN is a multilevel system designed to link frontline clinical microbiology laboratories and hospitals and other institutions to state and local public health laboratories in supporting advanced capacity public health, military, veterinary, agricultural, water and food testing laboratories at the federal level. Laboratories within the LRN are divided into 3 levels: Sentinel Labs, Reference Labs, and National Labs.

 As the term suggests, Terrorists excel at creating panic. What is so insidious about chemical and biological terrorism is that it involves agents that we can’t see. People don’t know how to react when they can’t see what is hurting them. There are several examples, from a commercial bus crash to someone who reported smelling gas in a school, where rumors that the incidents were caused by either biological or chemical terrorism triggered an “epidemic hysteria”. In both areas the local hospital’s emergency room was overwhelmed. In each of the incidents mentioned, State and Federal officials spent countless hours investigating and found no possible biohazard, but the panic was real. From these experiences we see more than ever that healthcare workers are not just the first line of defense in the event of an actual attack, they are who the public looks to for rationality and reliable information in an bioterrorism emergency.

Offering or taking a bribe, kickback, bonus, commission, or inducement is against the rules of the Board and against the law. Many companies give away small promotional items, such as pens or note pads, to promote their products. This is legal, but be cautious about accepting more valuable items. This could be seen as a bribe. All of the following are serious violations of Board, state, and federal rules:Participating in any commissions, bonuses, kickbacks, inducements, or split-fee arrangements from physicians, health care providers, suppliers, hospitals, nursing homes, other clinical laboratories, pharmacies, and other facilities.Exploiting or influencing a patient for financial gain, including promoting, selling, or withholding services, drugs, or referrals.

Insurance industry analysis of data from 1985 through 2003 shows that about two thirds of medical errors occur in hospitals and about one third occur in physician offices. About half of hospital errors occur in operating rooms and one sixth occur in patient rooms. Wherever medical errors occur, laboratory professionals can be involved.

Errors also occur after analyses are completed and reported. Postanalytic errors begin with the medical professionals who receive test results, and they include interpretation of the results. These errors can occur at--the bedside, chair-side, hospital, clinic-- wherever the patient and the medical professional are located. The possibility for postanalytic medical error continues through diagnosis and treatment procedures and processes. These medical errors occur during the time after the laboratory reports test results. Examples: Wrong test value associated with patient Wrong test interpretation Wrong diagnosis Wrong treatment Laboratory professional might believe they are not associated with postanalytic medical errors, but they can. One deadly example is fatal hemolytic transfusion reactions involving laboratory errors.

Laboratories must not induce physicians to order unnecessary tests through their marketing or education activities: They must monitor the use of laboratory services by their clients. They must correct any situation where something they did caused an unnecessary increase in test utilization. Cost Reports Hospitals laboratories must ensure that information used in hospital Medicare cost reports is accurate and includes only those costs which are appropriate. Laboratories must follow all CLIA and OSHA regulations: failure to do so may result in a False Claims Act violation.

The setting is automated chemistry department, night shift, busy core laboratory for a hospital based outreach laboratory. A medical technologist who operates the automated chemistry analyzer on third shift encounters short samples a couple of times a night. When this happens, he runs as many of the ordered tests as he can and fills in the blank results with a comment indicating that a short sample occurred. As far as he knows there isn't a policy that addresses this problem directly.The test reports out with the results and the comments. The technologist does not have to change the physician order in any way and is providing the maximum results that can be reported for the specimen in a timely fashion. This is done as a matter of patient care and quality service. There has not ever been a complaint about this practice as far as he knows. Are there any additional steps this technologist should be taking?Correct Answer: The technologist should follow the procedures that the laboratory has in place for testing and billing samples for which there is no order or for ambiguous orders. If the policies do not seem to address his particular situation, he thinks there should be a separate policy to cover this situation or has a question about it, he should talk to his supervisor or to the laboratory compliance officerDiscussion: This choice addresses the problem in the most complete manner, in that the employee fulfills his responsibility to take action when he thinks there is a problem.

Busy hospital laboratory in a 350 bed urban hospital that provides laboratory testing for the hospital and for the hospital's outreach testing laboratory. A medical technologist in the microbiology department receives a call from a friend who works in a laboratory in a physician office. The physician is not a regular client of the laboratory currently but uses another laboratory for most of their work. The microbiologist knows that the sales department would like to get this account. The friend explains to her that she is doing a quality control check on her in-office microbiology testing and her regular laboratory will do it but is going to charge her for it. She asks the microbiologist if she will do it for free since it is quality control, not Medicare and is not going to be billed to anyone.She tells the microbiologist that she would like to use the hospital lab for everything but her doctor insists on using the competitor. She indicates that the favor might help get the doctor to try the hospital laboratory for other tests. The microbiologist should:Correct Answer: Explain to her friend that if the hospital does the tests for no charge on the promise of other referrals, both the physician office and the hospital could be liable for violations of the antikickback statute.Discussion: The antikickback statute is implicated in this scenario because the free testing is solicited on the condition that other referrals may occur as a result of providing the favor. In fact, the solicitation itself is a violation of the law. The fact that Medicare patients are not specifically mentioned in the scenario is not sufficient to remove the risk. The technologist should also report the incident to the Compliance Officer and seek advise about what documentation, if any, should be kept concerning the incident.

Handwashing is the single most important method of infection control and prevention available.It prevents many other community and hospital acquired infections.It is essential in the prevention of bloodborne pathogen transmission.

Julie Smith was a newly certified phlebotomist and had been working at Northwood Hospital for several months. As she approached room 825, she looked on her collection list to verify this was the correct room for her first collection. Indeed it was, even though there was no patient name on the door. Her collection list told her the patient in room 825 was a 55 year old male named John Ready. After knocking several times, Julie entered the room to find a middle aged man who appeared to be sleeping. Julie approached the patient and said, “Good day Mr. Ready. My name is Julie and I am from the lab. I need to draw blood for some tests ordered by your doctor.” The man awoke and seemed irritated as Julie repeated herself. The patient responded and told Julie to do whatever she needed to do so he could go back to sleep Julie then proceeded to do the venipuncture.

Marcie Moore was a phlebotomist at a community hospital in Atlanta. It was her week to collect the pediatric unit and she was on her way to the room of a newborn for which she had just received orders to draw a STAT BMP (chem-7) and bilirubin. After informing the mother of the baby about the test she needed to perform, Marcie set up to perform a heel stick on the baby. Marcie chose a site on the outer edge of the heel on the bottom of the baby’s foot ( the correct area for a heel stick) and made a small incision with a Tenderfoot lancet after cleaning the site well with alcohol.She immediately began collecting the blood in the correct tube for the BMP and bilirubin. Blood flow was not strong so Marcie squeezed the baby’s foot a little to help the blood come out faster – the newborn was screaming and Marcie could tell it was making the mother uncomfortable. She wanted to hurry and get done so the mother could hold the baby.After the chemistry tech ran the blood tests on the tube, she informed Marcie that the newborn had a panic potassium level which did not coincide with the previous blood work on the newborn. Also the chemistry instrument could not perform the bilirubin due to hemolysis. Marcie was asked to recollect the specimen.

John Wagner, a phlebotomist at General Hospital, went up to the 7th floor to draw routine blood work on a patient. As he approached the door of the patient’s room he noticed a red stop sign on the door with the words “Respiratory Isolation” written on it.

Julie Smith, a newly certified phlebotomist at Northlake Hospital, entered a patient’s room on the third floor for a routine blood draw. The patient was an elderly woman who had very small fragile veins. Julie therefore decided to use a safety butterfly needle attached to a Vacutainer tube in order to draw the blood. When Julie was finished with the venipuncture, she detached the butterfly needle from the Vacutainer, and approached the Biohazard needle disposal box. She noticed that the disposal box was full , but decided to try to fit the butterfly into the box anyway. Holding the butterfly by the tubing, she tried to push the butterfly into the box. The needle suddenly recoiled and stuck Julie’s finger. Julie left the patient’s room in a panic and headed back to the lab to report the needle stick injury.

A phlebotomist at Memorial Hills Hospital entered the room of a 6 year old patient. The only test ordered was a CBC, so the phlebotomist decided to do a finger stick. After gathering proper supplies for the finger stick, the phlebotomist began the procedure by putting on gloves and wiping the tip and side of the patient’s ring finger with alcohol. He positioned the safety lancet between the ball and the side of the finger and made a small incision. The child cried as the blood was collected.

This phlebotomist violated hospital procedures in several ways that could adversely impact patient care: Cleaning the site only with alcohol, not iodine, could result in a false-positive contaminated blood culture. This might result in the patient receiving unnecessary intravenous antibiotics, and could prolong the patients hospital stay unnecessarily. Drawing both cultures at the same time lessens the chance of recovering a bloodstream organism.Drawing both cultures from the same site might result in both of them being contaminated, making it very difficult for the physician to distinguish contamination from a “real” bloodstream infection.Relevant topics:Blood cultures: introduction, Avoid skin contamination, Blood culture site preparation 1, Blood culture site preparation 2

Be alert to signs posted on the hospital room door or above the hospital bed.Such signs may warn you to use appropriate personal protective equipment according to your institution’s isolation policies and procedures. Other signs may specify that the left of right arm should be avoided. Patients may also alert you to avoid the use of an arm.

A 17-year-old young woman was admitted to the hospital with abdominal pain and a tentative diagnosis of appendicitis.The total white blood count was 14,500 cells/cumm with a left shift and neutrophils with changes tagged by the arrow in the photographs (see blue arrow).The bluish-staining, blurred accumulations in the cytoplasm (Doehle bodies), are located at the cell periphery in neutrophils with toxic changes.Doehle bodies are remnants of endocytoplasmic reticulum and are products of cytokine activity in the induction and shortened activity of neutrophil activation.They are often present in conditions with increased neutrophil lysosomal activity, manifest as toxic granulation.In this case, the presence of Doehle bodies serves as markers for infection-induced leukocytosis and supports the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.