| References Glassy, Eric F.,(Ed). Color Atlas of Hematology: An Illustrated Field Guide Based on Proficiency Testing. 1998. College of American Pathologists Hematology and Cliical Microbiology Research Committee. College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL 60093-2750.Hookey,L., Dexter, D., Lee,D. H. The Use and Interpretation Of Quantative Terminology In Reporting Red Blood Cell Morphology. Laboratory Hematology 7:85-88, 2001.Peterson P, Blomberg DJ, Rabinovitch A, Cornbleet PJ. Physician Review of the Peripheral Blood Smear: When and Why. For the Hematology and Clinical Microscopy Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Laboratory Hematology 7:175-179, 2001 | View Page |
| Criteria for peripheral blood smear review Initial analysis of the peripheral blood picture is made in most clinical laboratories with an automated instrument. Samples are selected for further analysis when quantitative or qualitative abnormalities beyond a defined standard are found. The following are examples of quantitative RBC abnormalities that may prompt a blood smear review. Each laboratory, however, should develop its own guidelines: Hgb: < 8 or >18 g/dL (<10 or > 21g/dL in a newborn)Hct: <20% or > 60% in adults (<40% or >65% in a newborn)MCHC: <29 g/dLMCV: <69 femtoliters (fl) or >110flFlags generated by the hematology analyzer that indicate possible red cell abnormalities or spurious resultsAny of these findings should be followed up with a peripheral blood smear review. | View Page |
| Guidelines for standard reports In a study on the reporting of red blood cell morphology abnormalities conducted in Ontario, Canada (Hookey L, Dexter D, Lee DH, Laboratory Hematology 7:83-88, 2001), fewer than 50% of 33 participants used the same term to describe the quantitative frequency of peripheral blood abnormalities. Seven blood smears, each containing one of several abnormal erythrocytes-- schistocytes, teardrop cells, acanthocytes, and Howell-Jolly bodies--were evaluated by 32 participants. The participants were asked to document their evaluations from a list of quantitative terms. There was a heterogeneity in the use of terms "rare," "slight," "occasional," "few," "mild", "present," "moderate," "many," and "marked." Choices of terms were subjective without points of reference. Guidelines for establishing standardized qualitative estimations of abnormal erythrocytes in the peripheral smear are presented as follows: 1+ = 2 - 4/Oil Immersion Field (OIF) 2+ = 5 - 7/OIF 3+ = 8 - 10/OIF 4+ = >10/OIF. The terms "few," "moderate," "many," and "marked" may be substituted for the 1+ - 4+ grading system, but only when their specific points of reference are universally understood in tandem with the above guidelines. A comment should be triggered if any erythrocyte abnormalities are seen in numbers >3/OIF including, but not limited to, polychromasia, basophilic stippling, nucleated RBC's, and Howell-Jolly bodies. Rouleaux or RBC agglutination are important findings and must be documented. | View Page |