Helena Information and Courses from MediaLab, Inc.

Automated systems for protein electrophoresis are available for large volumes of samples for electrophoresis. An automated system is capable of separating 10-100 samples simultaneously. There are several different automated systems and the number of process steps automated varies. Automated steps may include reagent addition, sample application, electrophoresis separation, staining, and detection.Below is a stained electrophoresis land for one sample analyzed on the automated instrument, SPIFE 3000, Helena Laboratories. The separated proteins are stained with Acid Blue, a Helena Laboratories' stain developed from Coomassie dye.

After electrophoresis, a stained gel is passed through the optical system of a densitometer to create an electrophoregram, a visual diagram or graph of the separated bands. A densitometer is a special spectrophotometer that measures light transmitted through a solid sample such as a cleared or transparent but stained gel. Using the optical density measurements, the densitometer represents the bands as peaks. These peaks compose the graph or electrophoregram and are printed on a recorder chart or computer display. Absorbance and/or fluorescence can be measured with densitometry.An integrator or microprocessor evaluates the area under each peak and reports each as a percent of the total sample. If the electrophoresis is for separation of serum proteins, the concentration of each band is derived from this percent and the total protein concentration. If the electrophoresis is for separation of enzymes, the enzyme activity of each band is derived from this percent and the total enzyme activity. The densitometer scan below depicts the separated bands from a serum sample electrophoresis. The SPIFE 3000, Helena Laboratories, electrophoresis splits the beta zone into two fractions for easier detection of small beta-migrating monoclonal gammopathies. The densitometer scan from this electrophoresis shows five bands with two peaks in the beta band.

One of the problems with Lp(a) measurement is that the Apo(a) protein has a variable mass. It can have a molecular weight ranging from 275,000 to 800,000 daltons. This is due to variable amounts of repeating regions of the protein. Immunoassay antibodies which recognize these regions will thus give more signal for larger Apo(a) molecules compared to smaller Apo(a) molecules. This is not ideal since again, we would prefer to quantify the number of particles and Lp(a) containing large Apo(a) molecules will produce more signal, skewing the count. One assay system that tries to correct for this is the Lp(a) Cholesterol Electrophoresis Assay sold by Helena Laboratories. This assay uses electrophoresis followed by cholesterol staining and densitometry to calculate the concentration of cholesterol in Lp(a). Although this method still does not enumerate particles, it does appear to have less heterogeneity.Lp(a) is an acute phase reactant. This means that Lp(a) levels will rise in the context of general inflammation. Thus, Lp(a) should not be measured when there is extensive inflammation, such as immediately following a cardiovascular event. Concentrations of Lp(a) above 30 mg/dL are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The risk of having a cardiovascular event increases 2 to 3 fold if Lp(a) cholesterol is > 30 mg/dL. Fifteen to 20% of the Caucasian population have Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dL. Africans, or people of Aftican descent, generally have levels higher than Caucasians and Asians, however, results must be evaluated in conjunction with clinical history.