1. Aniara Learning Center. Coagulation Corner. Mixing Studies: To correct or not correct-that is the question. June 2009. http://www.aniara.com/learning-center/Coagulation-Corner/articles/2009/01/mixing-studiesto-correct-or-not-correct.aspx.2. Bethel, M and Adcock, D: Laboratory evaluation of a prolonged APTT and PT. Lab Med, 285, May 2004.3. Devreese KM. Interpretation of normal plasma mixing studies in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants. Thromb Res 2007;119:369-76.4. Harmening, D. Clinical Hematology and Fundamentals of Hemostasis. 5th edition. F.A. Davis, 2009.5. Katrien M.J. Devreese, Interpretation of normal plasma mixing studiesin the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants, ThrombosisResearch, Volume 119, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 369-376, ISSN 0049-3848,DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.03.012.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T1C-4JYKP68-1/2/12550b597f6b88b11e09b26e74963d4f)Keywords: Lupus anticoagulants; Mixing tests; Percent correction formula; Rosner index6. McKenzie, S. Clinical Laboratory Hematology. 2nd edition. Pearson, 2010.7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Determination of Factor Coagulant Activities, H48A. NCCLS, 1997.8. Santora SA, Eby CS, Chapter 106: Laboratory evaluation of hemostatic disorders. Pages 1841-1844. In: Hoffman R, Benz, EJ, Jr et. al Hematology. Basic Prinicples and Practice. 3rd edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2000.9. Vancott, E and Laposata, M: Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Hypercoagulation. 2001.