| Introduction We are all aware of the clinical laboratory's role in assessing overall health and we are also aware that measuring a patient's serum lipids will provide some insight into their cardiovascular health. The traditional measurements of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides are the 'classic' cardiovascular risk markers.Laboratorians, and even the general public are now well-aware that LDL-C ('bad' cholesterol) concentrations should be low while HDL-C ('good' cholesterol) concentrations should be high. Triglycerides should be kept in check as well. Optimal levels are shown in the table below. So what is the risk if these values are not within optimal ranges?Cardiovascular risk can be simply defined as increasing the odds of having a pathology which affects blood flow and/or the heart. The most common cardiovascular pathology is atherosclerosis. Other cardiovascular pathologies whose odds increase as serum lipids and other cardiovascular markers become suboptimal are myocardial infarction (heart attack), stroke, congestive heart disease and coronary artery disease. Other diseases such as diabetes and the metabolic syndrome are also strongly associated with the classic cardiovascular risk markers LDL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides. | View Page |
| Introduction cont. The importance of cardiovascular risk markers arises from the fact that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and that traditional lipid screening protocols often fail to identify high-risk patients. A recent prospective study of nearly 28,000 healthy middle-aged women showed that 77% of cardiovascular events occurred in those with LDL-C values below 160 mg/dL while 46% occurred in those with levels below 130 mg/dL. By using other or additional cardiovascular risk markers we can detect and treat those at risk earlier. | View Page |
| Risk Markers We have listed the 'classic' cardiovascular risk markers as LDL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides. But there are many more cardiovascular risk markers as well as cardiovascular risk factors. A cardiovascular risk factor is a condition (not a laboratory analyte) that is associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Examples include: Age Gender (males are at increased risk) Heredity Hypertension Cigarette Smoking Obesity Diabetes StressThere are also negative risk factors, factors which decrease a person's risk of cardiovascular disease. Examples include: Optimal HDL-C concentration Exercise Estrogen Moderate alcohol intakeThis course will not focus on cardiovascular risk factors. Instead we will focus on newer, emerging cardiovascular risk markers. There are well over twenty well-studied cardiovascular risk markers; in this course we will focus on some of the more established markers and the ones which are becoming more commonly measured in the clinical laboratory. These include apolipoprotein A1/apolipoprotein B100, Lp(a), oxidized LDL, LpPLA2, hsCRP and lipoprotein particle size and concentration.It is important to remember that the association between a cardiovascular risk marker and actually having or developing cardiovascular disease is a statistical one. The fact that a patient has a particular risk marker which is abnormal simply increases the probability of developing cardiovascular disease, it does not mean that he or she is certain to develop cardiovascular disease. Conversely, if an individual does not have a particular cardiovascular risk marker present it does not guarantee protection against cardiovascular disease. We must always remember that some percentage of individuals who have heart attacks or strokes will not have abnormal risk markers present. | View Page |
| Atherosclerosis continued If a plaque ruptures it will expose sub-endothelial tissue to blood cells and in so doing stimulate the formation of a clot. The clot is the body's attempt to seal off the crack but the clot itself can cause further obstruction to blood flow. This sudden increase in the blockage caused by the raised ruptured plaque and associated clot can transform a mild blockage into a critical one within a matter of hours. If it occurs within the blood vessels of the heart, the decrease in blood flow leads to severe and prolonged chest pain known as unstable angina. Such a patient is at obvious risk for a myocardial infarct should the blockage become any worse.Atherosclerosis typically begins in early adolescence, and is found in most major arteries but since it is asymptomatic during the early half of life we need cardiovascualr risk markers to help assess patient risk. If an at-risk patient is identified early, the hope is that medication, lifestyle changes or medical procedures can be used to avert a serious cardiovascular event. So, although the vast majority of us have some degree of atherosclerosis, risk markers can help identify those among us who are in more imminent danger or who have increased risk of an adverse cardiovascular event. | View Page |
| Atherosclerosis Atherosclerosis is a clogging, narrowing and hardening of the body's large and medium-sized blood vessels. Atherosclerosis can lead to hypertension, stroke, myocardial infarction (heart attack), renal problems, etc. Not surprisingly, cardiovascular risk markers tend to reflect a person's degree of atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis is actually a chronic inflammatory response within the walls of arteries. Small lipoproteins like LDL are able to diffuse through the endothelial wall of blood vessels and accumulate. The inflammatory component of atherosclerosis results from the migration of leukocytes (mainly macrophages) that enter the blood vessel walls. These macrophages seek to remove the deposited LDL as well as intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL). As macrophages phagocytose these lipoproteins, they become foam cells that get trapped in the endothelial space. This eventually leads to "hardening" or "furring" of the arteries and plaque formation. Arteriosclerosis is a general term describing any hardening (loss of elasticity) of medium or large arteries whereas atherosclerosis is a hardening of an artery specifically due to plaque. The risk to patients with significant atherosclerosis is that eventually a narrowing of the artery (stenosis) can cause a reduction in oxygen delivery to tissues and plaque rupture can lead to an acute coronary event. | View Page |
| Patient Studies to Validate Risk Markers Risk markers are first hypothesized and then tested. Once a potential marker is identified, concentrations of the serum marker are correlated with patient outcomes. Cardiovascular risk marker studies are typically either retrospective or prospective epidemiology studies. A retrospective study looks backwards at a patient population. For example, we identify (through a hospital database perhaps) patients who have had myocardial infarcts or some other adverse outcome as well as similar subjects without that outcome to use as controls. We then go back and find archived patient serum samples and relate the concentrations of our new risk marker with patient outcomes. Retrospective studies can only be performed if you have archived samples from the patient. Prospective studies look forward in time. For example, we first select a group of subjects and measure our new risk marker in these patients over time. After a few years, we see how the serum concentrations relate to the patient outcomes. Obviously, prospective studies take much longer to perform than retrospective studies. Whatever study model is used, when assessing the value of a cardiovascular risk marker, we must correlate serum concentrations with a specific outcome. The outcome is determined by the study authors. Outcomes could be things like myocardial infarction, stroke, a diagnosis of coronary artery disease, death, or any cardiovascular 'event.'Concentrations of risk markers are divided into tertiles, quatriles or quintiles. This simply means that the top 33%, top 25% or top 20% of the serum concentration values are compared to the bottom 33%, 25% or 20%. For example, risk marker studies will often compare the outcomes of patients with serum concentrations in the upper tertile (those in the top third) with those in the bottom tertile (those in the bottom third) to see if the top 33% had significantly worse outcomes; if so, the risk marker has clinical value. | View Page |
| Which of the following is NOT a cardiovascular risk factor? | View Page |
| Which of the following statements is true? | View Page |
| Importance of Determining Size and Number of Lipoprotein Particles In the clinical laboratory, we routinely measure the cholesterol content of high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein particles and not the apolipoproteins on the particles or the number of particles. Proprietary detergents and reagents are used in assays for HDL-C and LDL-C to separate lipoproteins, allowing the cholesterol content of specific lipoproteins to be measured. For example, HDL-C is commonly measured using a solution of dextran sulfate and magnesium to selectively precipitate HDL from the other lipoproteins present in the sample. Once isolated, the HDL particles are 'dissolved' and the amount of cholesterol in them is determined photometrically using a color-producing enzyme reaction. LDL-C can be measured directly or can be estimated using the HDL-C, triglycerides and total cholesterol (TC) values. The Friedewald formula is often used to calculate LDL: LDL-C = TC - (HDL-C)+(Triglycerides/5). The important point to consider here is that traditional LDL-C and HDL-C measurements only tell us how much cholesterol is associated with each lipoprotein particle class. We are now learning that the number and size of the particles are important as well. The number of LDL particles appears to be more strongly predictive of cardiovascular disease than the LDL-C content, and small dense LDL are known to be more atherogenic than larger, less dense LDL particles. | View Page |
| Measuring Apolipoproteins Recall that the inflammatory events leading to atherosclerosis are due to the presence of LDL particles which diffuse through the endothelium and into the vessel wall. It makes sense that the more LDL particles there are, the more risk there would be for LDL depositing in the vessel wall. It would seem therefore that measuring the number of LDL particles could be more useful than measuring the cholesterol content of the particles. Traditional measurements of LDL-C quantify the amount of cholesterol associated with all the LDL in a patient sample; they don't tell us how many LDL particles there are. An analogy can be made with battleships. If you wanted to measure the size of a navy that was sailing for your shores, it makes more sense to count the number of ships than to count the amount of cargo the ships carry in order to estimate the number of ships. Of course, it is intuitive that the more LDL-C there is, the greater the number of LDL particles. In that sense, LDL particle number should correlate to LDL cholesterol, and this is indeed true. However, studies now show that measurement of the number of LDL particles is a more powerful predictor of cardiovascular risk. The exact relationship between LDL particle number and cholesterol content actually varies due to the fact that the lipoproteins vary in size and in the ratio of triglycerides to cholesterol. So, although cholesterol is related to LDL particle number, it is not in perfect proportion.How can we then measure LDL particle number? The most obvious way would be to measure apolipoprotein B100 (often abbreviated ApoB). Each LDL particle has one molecule of ApoB attached to it. Therefore, if we measured ApoB, we would be measuring the number of LDL particles, not the contents of those particles, and number appears to be more important with regard to adverse outcomes. | View Page |
| ApoB and ApoA1 By measuring ApoB we can quantify the amount of all atherogenic or potentially atherogenic lipoproteins that carry this apolipoprotein. Although lipoprotein particles other than LDL can carry ApoB, LDL accounts for the vast majority of ApoB; therefore, it is a good index of LDL particle number. Furthermore, the other particles that can have ApoB (such as IDL and Lp(a)) are also atherogenic and so it is not problematic if they are counted along with LDL, since they also contribute to cardiovascular risk. What about ApoA1? HDL-C is known as 'good cholesterol'. The role for HDL in the body is to sequester excess cholesterol and bring it back to the liver. Since HDL can remove cholesterol and transport it back to the liver for excretion or re-utilization it is indeed good. HDL is a negative cardiovascular risk factor; as its concentration goes up, a person's cardiovascular risk decreases. A person with low cardiovascular risk would have low ApoB levels and high ApoA1 levels. If we measure both ApoB and ApoA1 and express them as a ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 we get a powerful cardiovascular risk marker. The ratio should be approximately 0.3-0.9. Patients with a higher ratio have elevated ApoB (LDL) and/or low ApoA1 (HDL) and are thus at increased risk. By combining these two markers in a ratio, we get synergy and enhanced predictive power. | View Page |
| ApoB/ApoA1: The Test Measuring ApoB and ApoA1 can be performed using standard immunoassay techniques. Nephelometry is popular, as are ELISA-based methods that are performed on automated chemistry analyzer platforms. The power of the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio as a cardiovascular risk marker is getting widespread attention. An individual with seemingly normal LDL-C may in fact have high ApoB concentrations. When this individual has his or her ApoB/ApoA1 ratio calculated, the risk is evident. Studies have also shown that patients with metabolic syndrome and type-2 diabetes can also easily be identified with the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, whereas these patients cannot always be identified by measuring LDL-C and HDL-C.In 2004, the global INTERHEART study of risk factors for acute myocardial infarction concluded that the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was the most important risk factor in all geographic regions. The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio is easy to use because the risk is integrated into a single number that indicates the balance between atherogenic and antiatherogenic particles.There have been many studies concerning the predictive power of the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio. One study, which involved thousands of patients who were followed for an average of 10 years, showed that the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was a strong predictor of stroke in addition to other cardiovascular events. Due to the evidence presented in studies like these, the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) has recommended that the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio be used as an alternative to the usual total cholesterol (TC)/HDL cholesterol ratio when determining lipoprotein-related risk for cardiovascular disease. Some believe that ApoB/ApoA1 testing will eventually replace traditional LDL-C and HDL-C measurements. | View Page |
| What can be said of a patient who has high ApoB and low ApoA1 concentrations? | View Page |
| Lp(a) Lipoprotein (a) is a modified version of LDL containing a unique protein, apolipoprotein (a). It was discovered in 1963 and is well-associated with vascular disease. Do not confuse apolipoprotein (a) with apolipoprotein A that is found on high density lipoprotein particles. Lipoprotein (a) is abbreviated as Lp(a). Lp(a) is an LDL particle whose ApoB molecule has formed a disulfide bond with another protein called Apo(a), see figure. Apo(a) is a protein very similar in structure to plasminogen. Numerous retrospective case control studies and prospective studies have shown Lp(a) to be an independent risk factor for vascular disease. This means that Lp(a) levels alone (not in conjunction with LDL, or patient risk factors) can predict cardiovascular risk. Lp(a) has been called the most atherogenic lipoprotein. Serum concentrations of Lp(a) are related to genetic factors; drugs and diet changes do not typically lower Lp(a) as they do LDL. | View Page |
| Lp(a) Testing One of the problems with Lp(a) measurement is that the Apo(a) protein has a variable mass. It can have a molecular weight ranging from 275,000 to 800,000 daltons. This is due to variable amounts of repeating regions of the protein. Immunoassay antibodies which recognize these regions will thus give more signal for larger Apo(a) molecules compared to smaller Apo(a) molecules. This is not ideal since again, we would prefer to quantify the number of particles and Lp(a) containing large Apo(a) molecules will produce more signal, skewing the count. One assay system that tries to correct for this is the Lp(a) Cholesterol Electrophoresis Assay sold by Helena Laboratories. This assay uses electrophoresis followed by cholesterol staining and densitometry to calculate the concentration of cholesterol in Lp(a). Although this method still does not enumerate particles, it does appear to have less heterogeneity.Lp(a) is an acute phase reactant. This means that Lp(a) levels will rise in the context of general inflammation. Thus, Lp(a) should not be measured when there is extensive inflammation, such as immediately following a cardiovascular event. Concentrations of Lp(a) above 30 mg/dL are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The risk of having a cardiovascular event increases 2 to 3 fold if Lp(a) cholesterol is > 30 mg/dL. Fifteen to 20% of the Caucasian population have Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dL. Africans, or people of Aftican descent, generally have levels higher than Caucasians and Asians, however, results must be evaluated in conjunction with clinical history. | View Page |
| Summary In this course we have described some emerging cardiovascular risk markers. It is important to note that there are many more markers, some of which appear robust and which may have clinical value. Examples of other risk markers that are emerging but were not discussed are listed in the table to the right.An important question that should always be asked is "how many risk markers do we need?" With so many risk markers available, the laboratory needs to research which markers are truly the strongest and most valuable for the patient demographic the facility deals with most and which markers physicians will order and utilize. | View Page |
| Adult Treatment Panel How do physicians interpret risk marker results? Assuming the laboratory offers, and physicians order, cardiovascular risk marker tests, how are these results used? The National Cholesterol Education Program periodically assembles scientists and physicians to create lipid treatment guidelines for patients. These panels are referred to as the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP). The third assembly of the ATP did not give specific guidelines regarding risk marker use in patients but they did acknowledge their potential utility. The general consensus is that novel cardiovascular risk markers should be used in selected patients, such as those who already have significant risk factors (hypertension, smoking, obesity, etc.) or in patients who have family histories of cardiovascular disease. The value in using risk markers is that they will not only uncover cardiovascular risk but they can also be used to motivate patients to alter lifestyle and diet. It is expected that as these emerging cardiovascular risk markers continue to be validated in clinical studies, they will become very useful and perhaps even be part of a new standard of care for patients.If risk marker levels can be correlated to treatment strategies, physicians will find them especially useful in tracking patient success. | View Page |
| High Sensitivity-C-Reactive Protein C-reactive protein (CRP) is a very sensitive acute phase reactant. Serum CRP levels increase following a variety of pro-inflammatory events such as infection, tissue necrosis, trauma, surgery and even malignancy. CRP levels can increase quickly and dramatically (often 100 fold) during inflammation. CRP can activate compliment, bind Fc receptors and can function as an opsonin, enhancing phagocytosis with certain infections. Measurement of CRP is not new, it has been on clinical laboratory testing menus for decades. However, a newer version of the CRP test is now in use to assess cardiovascular risk.High sensitivity-CRP (hs-CRP) assays have been developed that are more sensitive to the more subtle changes that can occur during chronic vascular inflammation. (Recall that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process.) By measuring hsCRP we can get a glimpse at vascular function. CRP has been shown to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic disease and cardiac death. A 2002 prospective study of more than 27,000 patients showed that the CRP concentration is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than the LDL-cholesterol level. | View Page |
| The hs-CRP Test The traditional CRP test has a typical reference range of < 8 mg/dL. The hs-CRP test, with its increased sensitivity has a reference or optimal range of < 3 mg/dL. As with most risk markers, the results of hs-CRP testing are generally interpreted on a relative scale; the higher the value, the higher the risk of a future cardiovascular event.The American Heart Association and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has defined risk groups with hs-CRP as follows: Low risk: < 1.0 mg/L Average risk: 1.0 to 3.0 mg/L High risk: > 3.0 mg/L It is important to note that hs-CRP assays are measuring the same protein as traditional CRP assays. Thus, in patients with active inflammation (such as chronic, active arthritis; lupus; infection; etc.) hs-CRP values would be expected to be high and would not necessarily implicate cardiovascular risk. If values greater than 10 mg/L are seen in repeated measurements, a non-cardiovascular cause should be considered. Taking anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, aspirin, etc.) or the statin-class of cholesterol-lowering drugs may reduce CRP levels in patients. This is not an artifact, but is thought to be an effect of treating the underlying inflammatory process. | View Page |
| Which of the following is FALSE concerning CRP or hs-CRP? | View Page |
| References Atherosclerosis. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services National Institutes of Health. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/dci/Diseases/Atherosclerosis/Atherosclerosis_WhatIs.htmlAccessed June 23, 2009.Daniels LB, Barrett-Connor E, Sarno M, Laughlin GA,Bettencourt R, Wolfert RL. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) independently predicts incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in an apparently healthy older population: The Rancho Bernardo study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:913-919.Executive Summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285:2486-2497. Frostegard, J, Wu R, Lemne C, Thulin T, Witztum JL and de Faire U. Circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein is increased in hypertension, Clin Sci 2003; 105, 615.Garza CA, Montoir VM, McConnell JP, et al. Association between lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(2):159-165.Interpretive Handbook, (MC0440rev0407) Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN;2007. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Bhatt DL, Calabrese LH: Recent advances in vascular inflammation: C-reactive protein and other inflammatory biomarkers. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16:18-24.Mora S, Szklo M, Otvos JD, et al. LDL particle subclasses, LDL particle size, and carotid atherosclerosis in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2007;192:211-217.NACB Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines. Emerging biomarkers of cardiovascular disease and stroke. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines. 2006.PLACtest animation, diaDexus. http://www.plactest.com/laboratorians/action.php Accessed June 23, 2009.Rifai N, Warnick GR. Lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and other cardiovascular risk factors. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER. Bruns DE. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders: 2006; chap. 26.Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, et al. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1557-1565.Sniderman AD. Differential response of cholesterol and particle measures of atherogenic lipoproteins to LDL-lowering therapy: Implications for clinical practice. J Clin Lipidol 2008;2:36-42.Tsimikas, S, Brilakis ES, Miller ER, et al. Oxidized phospholipids, Lp(a) lipoprotein, and coronary artery disease, N Engl J Med: 2005;353:46.Tsimikas S, Bergmark C, Beyer RW, et al. Temporal increases in plasma markers of oxidized low-density lipoprotein strongly reflect the presence of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 360.Tsimikas, S, Lau HK, Han KR, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention results in acute increases in oxidized phospholipids and lipoprotein(a): Short-term and long-term immunologic responses to oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Circulation. 2004;109, 3164.Tsimikas S, Witztum JL, Miller ER, Sasiela WJ, et al. High-dose atorvastatin reduces total plasma levels of oxidized phospholipids and immune complexes present on apolipoprotein B-100 in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the MIRACL trial, Circulation: 2004;110, 1406. Walldius G, Jungner I, Holme I, et al. High apolipoprotein B, low apolipoprotein A-I, and improvement in the prediction of fatal myocardial infarction (AMORIS study): a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358:2026-2033.Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937-952. | View Page |
| LpPLA2 LpPLA2 refers to lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2. This enzyme is also known as platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase(PAF). The LpPLA2 enzyme is a lipase found predominantly on the surface of LDL particles. Note that LpPLA2 is a lipase enzyme and not an apolipoprotein. LpPLA2 is made by inflammatory cells (T cells, mast cells, macrophages) and then integrated onto the surface of lipoprotein particles. The enzymatic function of LpPLA2 is to hydrolyze oxidized phospholipids in LDL.LpPLA2 plays a corrective role in removing oxidized phospholipids. Thus, it might seem that having high levels of LpPLA2 would be good. However, although LpPLA2 has a positive role in removing oxidized lipids, it also generates inflammatory products in the process. So in fact, high levels of LpPLA2 are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Researchers have identified high amounts of LpPLA2 in human atherosclerotic lesions. The LpPLA2 that accumulates in the vessel wall can come from LDL (which can carry LpPLA2 on its surface) or it can come from immune cells that have invaded the vessel wall. Since Lp-PLA2 is produced or localized in the plaque itself, it may be a more specific marker of cardiovascular function compared to systemic, more general inflammatory markers like hs-CRP. | View Page |
| LpPLA2 and Cardiovascular Risk There have been dozens of clinical studies demonstrating LpPLA2's ability to predict cardiovascular risk. A 2008 study showed that people whose LpPLA2 concentrations were in the upper quartile were 1.64 times more likely to have a cardiac event than those in the lowest quartile. A meta-analysis (a study that sums the results of several other studies) performed by researchers at the Mayo Clinic showed that the unadjusted odds ratio for the association between elevated Lp-PLA2 levels and cardiovascular disease risk was 1.51, indicating that patients with elevated LpPLA2 patients had 1.51 times the risk of cardiovascular disease or events. | View Page |
| Oxidized LDL Physiology Oxidized LDL leads to the release of chemotactic factors from nearby cells; factors which signal leukocytes to migrate to the site. Recall that atherosclerosis is believed to be caused by phagocytic cells such as macrophages, which ingest LDL particles and turn into stationary foam cells. Macrophages have been shown to have increased affinity for oxidized LDL. Thus, oxidation makes LDL more susceptible to phagocytosis and therefore more atherogenic.Since oxidized LDL is more atherogenic than native LDL it makes sense that oxidized LDL may be a cardiovascular risk marker. Indeed, many studies have now correlated increased levels of oxidized LDL with risk of cardiac events. | View Page |
| LDL Phenotype by Electrophoresis When LDL is resolved with electrophoresis, it reveals several subfractions. These subfractions are simply different size populations of LDL particles. Age, gender and lipid status can all affect the LDL subfractionation profile. Individuals who have less dense (so called 'buoyant') LDL have most of their LDL in subfractions 1 and 2. These results are referred to as pattern or phenotype "A" and are normal. Those with significant amounts of subfractions 3- 7 (more dense particles) are at higher cardiovascular risk. These patients have pattern or phenotype "B". The B pattern rarely occurs as an isolated disorder. It is usually accompanied by characteristics of the metabolic syndrome: hypertriglyceridemia, reduced HDL-C , abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, etc. | View Page |
| Electrophoresis Testing Serum lipoprotein electrophoresis is usually performed using fasting serum or plasma. In a fasting sample, large chylomicrons are not normally present and therefore, will not obscure or confound the gel. Because electrophoresis relies on dye-binding and densitometry, samples should have cholesterol > 100 mg/mL. The results of this testing can be used in a variety of ways but typically a report of "type B" or "type A" is sufficient to inform physicians whether there is increased cardiovascular risk. | View Page |