| Which of the following may interfere with the accurate measurement of hemoglobin: | View Page |
| Which one of the following factors does not affect the result of the PT assay? | View Page |
| Which of the following factors does not affect the result of the PTT assay? | View Page |
| This assay would be used to help rule out heparin contamination in a coagulation sample: | View Page |
| A deficiency in this Factor cannot be evaluated by both the PT and APTT assays: | View Page |
| The ratio of whole blood to anticoagulant is very important in the PT assay; at which hematocrit level should the standard anticoagulant volume be adjusted: | View Page |
| Traditional coagulation assays are based almost solely on this technique: | View Page |
| An abnormality of which of the following assays would be least likely to be associated with thrombotic tendency: | View Page |
| Warfarin-based (coumarin derivative) oral anti-coagulant therapy is commonly monitored with : | View Page |
| Match Factors with the assays used to monitor them | View Page |
| Importance of Determining Size and Number of Lipoprotein Particles In the clinical laboratory, we routinely measure the cholesterol content of high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein particles and not the apolipoproteins on the particles or the number of particles. Proprietary detergents and reagents are used in assays for HDL-C and LDL-C to separate lipoproteins, allowing the cholesterol content of specific lipoproteins to be measured. For example, HDL-C is commonly measured using a solution of dextran sulfate and magnesium to selectively precipitate HDL from the other lipoproteins present in the sample. Once isolated, the HDL particles are 'dissolved' and the amount of cholesterol in them is determined photometrically using a color-producing enzyme reaction. LDL-C can be measured directly or can be estimated using the HDL-C, triglycerides and total cholesterol (TC) values. The Friedewald formula is often used to calculate LDL: LDL-C = TC - (HDL-C)+(Triglycerides/5). The important point to consider here is that traditional LDL-C and HDL-C measurements only tell us how much cholesterol is associated with each lipoprotein particle class. We are now learning that the number and size of the particles are important as well. The number of LDL particles appears to be more strongly predictive of cardiovascular disease than the LDL-C content, and small dense LDL are known to be more atherogenic than larger, less dense LDL particles. | View Page |
| Lp(a) Testing One of the problems with Lp(a) measurement is that the Apo(a) protein has a variable mass. It can have a molecular weight ranging from 275,000 to 800,000 daltons. This is due to variable amounts of repeating regions of the protein. Immunoassay antibodies which recognize these regions will thus give more signal for larger Apo(a) molecules compared to smaller Apo(a) molecules. This is not ideal since again, we would prefer to quantify the number of particles and Lp(a) containing large Apo(a) molecules will produce more signal, skewing the count. One assay system that tries to correct for this is the Lp(a) Cholesterol Electrophoresis Assay sold by Helena Laboratories. This assay uses electrophoresis followed by cholesterol staining and densitometry to calculate the concentration of cholesterol in Lp(a). Although this method still does not enumerate particles, it does appear to have less heterogeneity.Lp(a) is an acute phase reactant. This means that Lp(a) levels will rise in the context of general inflammation. Thus, Lp(a) should not be measured when there is extensive inflammation, such as immediately following a cardiovascular event. Concentrations of Lp(a) above 30 mg/dL are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The risk of having a cardiovascular event increases 2 to 3 fold if Lp(a) cholesterol is > 30 mg/dL. Fifteen to 20% of the Caucasian population have Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dL. Africans, or people of Aftican descent, generally have levels higher than Caucasians and Asians, however, results must be evaluated in conjunction with clinical history. | View Page |
| High Sensitivity-C-Reactive Protein C-reactive protein (CRP) is a very sensitive acute phase reactant. Serum CRP levels increase following a variety of pro-inflammatory events such as infection, tissue necrosis, trauma, surgery and even malignancy. CRP levels can increase quickly and dramatically (often 100 fold) during inflammation. CRP can activate compliment, bind Fc receptors and can function as an opsonin, enhancing phagocytosis with certain infections. Measurement of CRP is not new, it has been on clinical laboratory testing menus for decades. However, a newer version of the CRP test is now in use to assess cardiovascular risk.High sensitivity-CRP (hs-CRP) assays have been developed that are more sensitive to the more subtle changes that can occur during chronic vascular inflammation. (Recall that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process.) By measuring hsCRP we can get a glimpse at vascular function. CRP has been shown to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic disease and cardiac death. A 2002 prospective study of more than 27,000 patients showed that the CRP concentration is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than the LDL-cholesterol level. | View Page |
| The hs-CRP Test The traditional CRP test has a typical reference range of < 8 mg/dL. The hs-CRP test, with its increased sensitivity has a reference or optimal range of < 3 mg/dL. As with most risk markers, the results of hs-CRP testing are generally interpreted on a relative scale; the higher the value, the higher the risk of a future cardiovascular event.The American Heart Association and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has defined risk groups with hs-CRP as follows: Low risk: < 1.0 mg/L Average risk: 1.0 to 3.0 mg/L High risk: > 3.0 mg/L It is important to note that hs-CRP assays are measuring the same protein as traditional CRP assays. Thus, in patients with active inflammation (such as chronic, active arthritis; lupus; infection; etc.) hs-CRP values would be expected to be high and would not necessarily implicate cardiovascular risk. If values greater than 10 mg/L are seen in repeated measurements, a non-cardiovascular cause should be considered. Taking anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, aspirin, etc.) or the statin-class of cholesterol-lowering drugs may reduce CRP levels in patients. This is not an artifact, but is thought to be an effect of treating the underlying inflammatory process. | View Page |
| Oxidized LDL Tests There are currently two antibodies that have been developed that target oxidized lipids; the 4E6 antibody and EO6 antibody. The 4E6 antibody is directed against an oxidized epitope on the ApoB-100 protein on LDL. The EO6 antibody recognizes oxidized phospholipids and the assay measures the content of these oxidized phospholipids on lipid particles that contain ApoB-100. | View Page |
| Which of the following tests could be used to distinguish whether an abnormal screening coagulation test result (PT or aPTT) is caused by a factor deficiency or an inhibitor?. | View Page |
| Which of the following laboratory tests of hemostatic function is a screening test used to assess the functionality of both the intrinsic and common pathways? | View Page |
| Tests of Hemostatic Function – Fibrinogen Assay The fibrinogen assay performed in the clinical laboratory is a quantitative measure of factor I.
This assay is used to determine whether there is enough fibrinogen present to allow for normal clotting.
It is performed in cases of an unexpected, prolonged bleeding event, or an unexpected abnormal PT and/or APTT.
Additionally, it is also used to aid in the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
A normal reference range is typically around 200-400 mg/dl.
That range is significant because fibrinogen levels
| View Page |
| Fibrin/Fibrinogen Degradation Products and D-dimers The presence of D-dimers in plasma or whole blood indicates that fibrin has been formed and degraded (fibrinolysis). Plasmin can also degrade intact fibrinogen, generating fibrinogen degradation products that are detected in fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) assays. D-dimers and FDP can become elevated whenever the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are activated. The presence of D-dimer confirms that both thrombin and plasmin have been generated since it can only be produced as the result of the plasmin degradation of fibrin. This makes the test for D-dimers more specific for fibrinolysis than the FDP test that also detects the products of the direct proteolysis of fibrinogen (fibrinogenolysis).The D-dimer test can be useful in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), two forms of venous thromboembolism (VTE). When the test is being used for this purpose, it is important that D-dimer levels are accurately measured and accurately reported because of the serious nature of this clinical decision. If the test is positive in a patient suspected to have DVT or PE, clinicians proceed with further diagnostic tests. If the test is negative, depending on the clinical situation and the sensitivity of the D-dimer assay, DVT or PE is considered unlikely and further diagnostic tests for DVT or PE might not be pursued. D-dimer is a sensitive, but not specific, diagnostic test for disseminated intravascular coagulation, and an indicator of increased risk of future myocardial infarction in patients evaluated for chest pain. | View Page |
| Tests of Hemostatic Function - Platelet Function Assay A platelet function assay (PFA) is a screening test for the evaluation of platelets/primary hemostasis. Common clinical applications include the following: Preoperative evaluation of platelet function Determining the presence of drug-induced platelet dysfunction Determining platelet functionality in high-risk pregnancy Evaluation of patients with suspected inherited or acquired platelet disorders such as von Willebrand disease Evaluation of a bleeding patientA PFA instrument is able to differentiate between drug-induced platelet defects and other platelet defects. PFA tests are superior to the bleeding time test. The bleeding time is often not reproducible and, in spite of attempts at standardization, remains prone to variations in test results between persons performing the test. It is also relatively insensitive to platelet function. The bleeding time cannot be used to identify patients who may have recently ingested aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or patients who may have a platelet defect attributable to these drugs. The bleeding time is used to assess platelet function, but may be affected by platelet quantity. NOTE: Aspirin, and some other drugs, may falsely prolong bleeding times. Patients must be asked about aspirin use, and be aspirin free for 7-10 days prior to testing, for valid results. | View Page |
| Tests of Hemostatic Function - Mixing Studies Performed after an unexpected, prolonged PT or APTT is encountered to determine if the problem stems from a factor deficiency or the presence of an inhibitor. To perform the test, the patients’ plasma is mixed with an equal volume of pooled normal plasma, and then a PT and APTT are performed off the mixture. If the addition of the pooled plasma brings the resultant values into normal range, then the pooled plasma contained factors the patient's sample was deficient in, and the patient has a factor deficiency. If the results are not “corrected” or brought back into normal range after the addition of pooled normal plasma, then an inhibitor may be present. The next step in the diagnostic sequence of events, if correction has occurred, is to perform a factor assay, to determine which specific factor is lacking. | View Page |
| Tests of Hemostatic Function - Factor Assays Used to determine the cause of an unexpected, prolonged PT or APTT.
This test is performed after mixing studies have been run, because factor assays are able to identify specific factor deficiencies or inhibitors.
Think of mixing studies as being the screening test, while factor assays are confirmatory tests for specific factor deficiencies.
The test itself is involves performing a PT and APTT, except that plasma known to be deficient in a specific factor type is combined with the patients plasma, comparing the resultant time to a standard curve.
The percent of activity, and amount of correction with normal plasma determines the specific factor deficiencies.
| View Page |
| Which of the following statements is incorrect? | View Page |
| Introduction Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is a disorder of iron regulation that results in excessive dietary iron absorption through the gastrointestinal tract. Over time, the resultant iron overload and its deposition in tissue may lead to widespread organ damage, a variety of chronic disorders, and even death. Although it is a genetic disorder, clinical symptoms most typically become apparent in middle aged adults. Iron overload occurs in a variety of hereditary and acquired forms, known as iron storage diseases. HH is the most common cause of inherited iron overload. (1) Due to lack of awareness, HH often goes undetected or unrecognized by health care providers. Early detection to prevent the serious complications associated with iron overload has important consequences for reducing morbidity and mortality. Laboratory tests that assess iron levels and molecular assays for genetic mutatations are essential for both its detection and diagnosis. | View Page |
| General Overview of Testing Tests for evaluating iron metabolism are generally used as initial or screening tests for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) as they will detect the phenotypic expression of HH. These tests include serum iron (SI), transferrin (Tf) or total iron binding capacity (TIBC), serum ferritin (SF), and unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC).The serum ferritin assay is also used to assess the effectiveness of HH treatment.Molecular (DNA) analyses for HFE mutations are considered to be confirmatory tests for HH which may be ordered reflexively in patients with elevated iron results. Laboratories should establish their own reference intervals for assays of iron metabolism. In general, reference intervals vary by sex and by method used for the assays discussed in the following section. Typical reference intervals are included in the following sections for instructive purposes only and should not be used for evaluating actual patient data.The results of laboratory tests assessing iron metabolism should be interpreted with caution because a number of pre-analytical and physiologic factors can affect the results. Repeating elevated test results on fasting specimens is often advisable. | View Page |
| Which laboratory assay is considered to be a confirmatory test for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| Specific HFE Mutations Several mutations of the HFE gene have been described. In the C282Y mutation, a base substitution leads to a change in the amino acid in position 282 from cysteine (C) to tyrosine (Y). The loss of the sulfhydryl-containing amino acid disrupts the tertiary structure of HFE so that it no longer binds to beta-2 microglobulin. Beta-2 microglobulin appears to act along with other proteins to chaperone the newly synthesized HFE out of the Golgi apparatus and to the cell surface where it can then bind to TfR. In the C282Y mutation, HFE remains in the Golgi, never making it to the cell surface. The result is that transferrin binding to TfR is enhanced and excessive amounts of iron enter the cells of the small intestine, liver, and other tissues. A second mutation, H63D, causes a histidine (H) residue in position 63 to be replaced by aspartic acid (D). The mechanism by which this mutation leads to increased iron uptake is less well understood when compared to the C282Y mutation. Unlike the C282Y mutation, the H63D mutation does not seem to affect the binding of beta-2 microglobulin and intracellular movement, since detectable concentrations of the mutated protein are found on cell membranes. Some researchers speculate that the H63D mutation affects the binding of proteins involved in iron regulation and uptake at the cell surface.A third mutation, S65C, leads to a serine-to-cysteine substitution in its associated protein. This mutation has been been found in some compound heterozygotes for C282Y or H63D, but is rarely associated with iron overload in HH.Additional mutations of HFE have been identified, but their clinical significance is unclear. Most laboratories performing molecular assays test for only the C282Y, H63D, and S65C mutations. | View Page |
| Secondary Disorders of Iron Overload In addition to hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), there are other conditions of iron overload that must be considered in a differential diagnosis. Disorders such as sickle cell disease, thalassemia, sideroblastic anemia, congenital dyserythropoietic anemia, and liver disease may also cause iron overload. Transfusion-dependant patients and persons who abuse iron-containing vitamin supplements are also at risk. These conditions are usually described as secondary iron overload, in contrast to the primary iron overload of HH.Patient history, clinical signs and symptoms, biochemical and hematologic laboratory analyses, and possibly results of a liver biopsy may be needed to establish a diagnosis of a condition causing secondary iron overload. DNA tests for common HFE mutations are very likely the most important diagnostic tool for identifying HH as the cause of iron overload. In some patients, both secondary causes and HH may be contributing to iron overload. Differentiating the secondary causes of iron overload from HH is heavily dependent on the results of laboratory assays, but a complete discussion is beyond the scope of this course. | View Page |
| Diagnosing HH The diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is made through a combination of laboratory tests and medical evaluation of a patient's signs and symptoms. Iron overload is identified by tests that evaluate iron metabolism, while molecular assays are needed to document mutations in the HFE gene or others such as hepcidin, hemojuvelin, or transferrin receptor. Individuals with documented iron overload who exhibit signs and symptoms consistent with HH and who possess HFE or other mutations are considered to have HH. Other causes of secondary iron overload may need to be ruled out.An example of a testing algorithm is shown. | View Page |
| Serum Ferritin Serum ferritin (SF) level reflects the amount of storage iron in tissues. An elevated SF combined with elevated TS implies primary iron overload. Patients with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) generally show increases in SF as adults, but a normal SF does not rule out the diagnosis of the disease. Children and premenopausal females with HFE mutations may have had inadequate time to develop iron overload, but may do so later in life.SF alone is inadequate as the sole screening test for HH because it lacks the necessary sensitivity and specificity. SF is frequently elevated in persons with inflammation, cancer, or infection. SF is often ordered along with the serum iron and TIBC when iron overload is suspected. SF is also important is assessing the efficacy of treatment of HH.Upper limits of reference intervals for SF are 200 ng/mL for premenopausal women and 300 ng/mL for men and postmenopausal women. 40 ng/mL is a typical lower limit for the reference interval.SF is measured in serum using immunochemical methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoradiometric assay, immunochemiluminescent assay, and immunofluorometry. SF tests are available as automated assays and in kit form.(2) | View Page |
| Screening Controversies The subject of screening for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is controversial and is currently being debated in the medical literature. Using laboratory tests to screen the asymptomatic general population is currently not recommended due to issues of testing costs, low genetic penetrance, and the possible risk of discrimination. Targeted case finding in select high risk populations such as men of Northern European ancestry may be a better approach to screening. (12)Molecular-based (DNA) assays required for confirmation of HH are costly when used for general population screening. Because recent studies have shown that a high percentage of persons with C282Y mutations do not develop iron overload or HH-related clinical conditions, screening for these mutations may falsely label an individual with a disease diagnosis. At the present time, it is impossible to determine which homozygotes or heterozygotes for HFE mutations will eventually develop iron overload. Furthermore, there is potential risk of discrimination in obtaining health insurance for persons identified as having genetic disorders.In contrast, some experts do advocate for screening the general population. Mutations associated with HH are very common in Caucasians in the US. Individuals who know they carry mutations associated with HH may benefit from periodic testing for iron overload. Finally, laboratory tests that assess iron status are relatively inexpensive, widely available, and offer one approach to screening for phenotypic expression of HH. Screening first-degree family members of a person with documented HH is generally considered to be worthwhile. Early detection of HH in relatives with common mutations may permit treatment before the development of substantial iron overload and related disease due to organ damage. | View Page |
| What is one established reason supporting general population screening for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| Molecular Tests DNA tests for HFE mutations associated with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) are available in some clinical laboratories and reference laboratories. Testing for the presence of the C282Y is essential, although most labs also test for H63D and S65C mutations. Molecular testing is most appropriate for confirmatory testing of symptomatic individuals with altered iron studies (increased TS and SF), in pre-symptomatic individuals (increased TS, normal SF and liver function tests), and in family members of individuals diagnosed with HH. The use of genetic tests alone for routine screening of asymptomatic persons is not recommended for several reasons. A positive test indicating the presence of HFE mutations does not guarantee that an individual will develop clinically significant iron overload or predict severity of symptoms. A negative result (no HFE mutations present) does not rule out a diagnosis of iron overload because of genetic heterogeneity. Compared to biochemical analyses for iron, molecular assays are expensive. Finally, molecular testing may result in the diagnosis of a genetic disease, thus opening up the possibility for discrimination in health insurance coverage. Using molecular methods, DNA is extracted from leukocytes in whole blood samples or from buccal cells and analyzed for specific HFE mutations using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with melt curve analysis. Currently there are no FDA-cleared products for HFE testing, and testing laboratories are using "home brew" reagents. This situation is expected to change as manufacturers submit products for FDA approval. | View Page |
| Which of the following does NOT apply to the use of molecular assays in testing for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH)? | View Page |
| Description of Specialties (4) Specialists in cytogenetics detect chromosome abnormalities and genetic disorders. Cytogenetics counseling may only be performed by an individual licenses in the cytogenetics specialty at the director level.
Specialists in molecular genetics analyze DNA and RNA to find disease-related genotypes, mutations, and phenotypes in order to detect or predict disease and identify carriers.
Specialists in histocompatibility test to determine tissue compatibility, prevent infections, and investigate and post-transplant problems. Techniques include blood typing, HLA typing, HLA antibody screening, disease markers, flow cytometry, crossmatching, HLA antibody identification, lymphocyte immunophenotyping, immunosuppressive drug assays, allogenic, isogeneic and autologous bone marrow processing and storage, mixed lymphocyte culture, stem cell culture, cell
mediated assays, and assays for the presence of cytokines.
Specialists in andrology and embryology examine gametes and embryos, including production, morphology, number, and motility, to address issues of fertility and infertility. | View Page |
| Laboratory Methods Immunoassay is the most common technique used by clinical laboratories for therapeutic drug monitoring. Antibodies that recognize drugs can be developed. Although most drugs are much too small to evoke an immune response, scientists can conjugate drugs to immunogenic proteins to produce antibodies that recognize drug-specific epitopes. There are several methods that utilize the principals of immunoassay for detection and quantification of therapeutic drugs in serum. Some of these methods are: Particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay (FPIA) Chemiluminescent assays | View Page |
| Chemiluminescence Chemiluminescent assays use antibodies that are conjugated to enzymes, such as peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase. These enzymes, mixed with chemiluminescent substrates, produce light in the visible spectrum. A direct relationship exists between the amount of drug that is present in the sample and the light units that are produced and measured by the luminometer in the instrument. Assays that use chemiluminescence are more sensitive than immunoassays that rely on the generation of a colored product. | View Page |
| Clinical Utility The ultimate goal in measuring CYP450 function or identifying polymorphisms is to predict effective therapeutic doses and responses in patients.Polymorphisms are identified using molecular techniques (allele-specific PCR, restriction digests, sequencing, hybridization assays, bead-based systems, microarrays, pyrosequencing, et al).Although most clinical labs do not offer PGx testing, reference labs are beginning to market these tests. For example, one reference laboratory in the Midwest that offers CYP2D6 profiling measures about one dozen of the most common and significant mutation sites on this enzyme. This allows for detection of approximately 98% of the known CYP2D6 polymorphisms. The laboratory then generates a report which will advise the physician on the patient's drug-metabolizing status.Estimates show that 6-10% of the general population have a complete deficiency of CYP2D6, with the prevalence of mutations varying from <1% to as much as 21% within a given population. | View Page |